New Steinjager crossover steering for my 2001

Thank you for the well written explanation
.
Since the mental pic you now have in your head shows that the ends of the tie rod in front of the axle have to extend past the ball joint center line and well into the inside lip of most tolerably back spaced rims, what happens when you put the tie rod behind the axle?
 
Since the mental pic you now have in your head shows that the ends of the tie rod in front of the axle have to extend past the ball joint center line and well into the inside lip of most tolerably back spaced rims, what happens when you put the tie rod behind the axle?
What happens? Like to maintain the same Ackerman? If I'm not oversimplifying it, the tie rod would have to be
shorter to remain on the imaginary line.
 
  • USA Proud
Reactions: Tob
Since the mental pic you now have in your head shows that the ends of the tie rod in front of the axle have to extend past the ball joint center line and well into the inside lip of most tolerably back spaced rims, what happens when you put the tie rod behind the axle?
You can intersect the line in rear (edit: with a shorter tie rod). In front you can only get close, as the line runs through the wheel.
 
Last edited:
You can intersect the line in rear. In front you can only get close, as the line runs through the wheel.
Nope, you can hit it perfectly in the front. That's why the steering arm is typically very close to the largest diameter of the rim relative to the knuckle. Look at a stock TJ sometime with factory rims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taylormade73
Nope, you can hit it perfectly in the front. That's why the steering arm is typically very close to the largest diameter of the rim relative to the knuckle. Look at a stock TJ sometime with factory rims.
Interesting. Ive never noticed there was enough offset of the steering rod end and the ball joint to actually be on the line. Ill look at my stock TJR tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Ackermann is the angle of the V created when you draw a line through the tie rod end connection points, intersect the kingpin axis and those both hit the center of the rear axle. They create proportional steering that follows the disparate arcs described by the two front tires due to them being separated by the width of the axle. In other words, the outside tire turns a larger circle than the inside so there needs to be a mechanism to cause that to happen no matter how much steering angle is used in a turn.

If you create a line from the center of the rear diff and extend it forward through the king pin axis, the ends of the tie rod need to intersect those lines on each side and the tie rod needs to be parallel to the axle centerline.
Slightly off topic but semi related, does the WJ swap screw up ackermann on the 94" wheelbase? Not wanting to do one again, just curious. Talking about running the tie rod on the intended lower arms, not trying to do that crap where they put it on the upper arm and use the RHD knuckle.
 
Slightly off topic but semi related, does the WJ swap screw up ackermann on the 94" wheelbase? Not wanting to do one again, just curious. Talking about running the tie rod on the intended lower arms, not trying to do that crap where they put it on the upper arm and use the RHD knuckle.
Not enough to matter. They did not change the knuckles for the 104" wheelbase TJ Unlimited and you can't tell.
 
Yall scared the poor bastard away

Maybe he's a middle class Jeeper that came from married parents. If so, after reading your post he may NEVER come back and offer what I suggested:
Please report back on a regular basis and let us know good, bad AND ugly. Not that I think it looks ugly.

At least this thread did offer that stuff in great detail, just not about his specific Steinjager crossover experience on his Jeep.
 
No, that was it. It has always just seemed very odd to me that the rear mount tie rod would work that way.
Meant to ask this the other day but forgot. So have you measured out what the TJ scrub radius actually is in stock form? Is it pretty much no scrub at all or a bit of positive scrub?
 
Meant to ask this the other day but forgot. So have you measured out what the TJ scrub radius actually is in stock form? Is it pretty much no scrub at all or a bit of positive scrub?
I was actually going to look into this... But I couldn't find the steering axis of inclination spec, so I quit. I was curious about factory wheel and tire combo vs what I'm running and how it compared. As I read into scrub radius, it made me think it may be contributing to a bit of squirreliness I get under Max effort braking
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tob
I was actually going to look into this... But I couldn't find the steering axis of inclination spec, so I quit. I was curious about factory wheel and tire combo vs what I'm running and how it compared. As I read into scrub radius, it made me think it may be contributing to a bit of squirreliness I get under Max effort braking
Yeah I’m not sure either. I know that typically 3.75-4” BS on 35’s seems to be pretty highly recommended but I’m not sure if that keeps the scrub radius similar to stock or not. It might be close if you go in 0.5” BS increments per tire size I guess.

(5.5” for 29’s, 5” for 31’s, 4.5” for 33’s, 4” for 35’s…)

I just wonder because I hear about squirm being an issue on vehicles with no positive or negative scrub radius so I’m curious what the stock setup is.

And then from there I wonder how stock vs altered scrub radius (or wheel placement in general based on effective BS) affects the Ackermann. I don’t see how the wheels can follow their perfect Ackermann arc based solely off the knuckle’s tie rod mounting points if the wheels can be mounted further out or in depending on backspacing. If you had a 12” spacer on each wheel and mounted the wheels way far out like that, how would they still follow the arc? I would think the wheel would have to be located in the perfect spot laterally to match the Ackermann that the knuckle in stock configuration would provide. I believe this is why many of the Jeeps with aftermarket tires chirp and squeak on tight turns. But, maybe I’m off.

And honestly probably none of it matters anyways but I just want to know for the sake of it.
 
Yeah I’m not sure either. I know that typically 3.75-4” BS on 35’s seems to be pretty highly recommended but I’m not sure if that keeps the scrub radius similar to stock or not. It might be close if you go in 0.5” BS increments per tire size I guess.

(5.5” for 29’s, 5” for 31’s, 4.5” for 33’s, 4” for 35’s…)

I just wonder because I hear about squirm being an issue on vehicles with no positive or negative scrub radius so I’m curious what the stock setup is.

And then from there I wonder how stock vs altered scrub radius (or wheel placement in general based on effective BS) affects the Ackermann. I don’t see how the wheels can follow their perfect Ackermann arc based solely off the knuckle’s tie rod mounting points if the wheels can be mounted further out or in depending on backspacing. If you had a 12” spacer on each wheel and mounted the wheels way far out like that, how would they still follow the arc? I would think the wheel would have to be located in the perfect spot laterally to match the Ackermann that the knuckle in stock configuration would provide. I believe this is why many of the Jeeps with aftermarket tires chirp and squeak on tight turns. But, maybe I’m off.

And honestly probably none of it matters anyways but I just want to know for the sake of it.
Ackermann is only a small part of it. Proper caster for the tire size and back spacing to put the extended kingpin axis line near the middle of the contact patch are also important.
 
pretty sure i saw an offset shank TRE in at least 1 of those pics @mrblaine.

i run a pair of offset TRE's and am not fond of the rolling behavior, does the offset shank TRE stay put any better or is it just as prone to rolling?
 
pretty sure i saw an offset shank TRE in at least 1 of those pics @mrblaine.

i run a pair of offset TRE's and am not fond of the rolling behavior, does the offset shank TRE stay put any better or is it just as prone to rolling?
I have not knowingly used them. You may have confused the OEM WJ ends with that style though. I don't and won't use them due to how they roll and how they promote bending the link under load because the force is not in line with the link.
 
  • Like
Reactions: someguysjeep