What problems does it have? And how would you change it?
Well it rear steers in off cambers bumps and bunny hops in the whoops for starters. All things longer arms and lower pickup point would mitigate.
What problems does it have? And how would you change it?
Well it rear steers in off cambers bumps and bunny hops in the whoops for starters. All things longer arms and lower pickup point would mitigate.
Just give him a pat and bone so he quits barking and we adults can have civil discussion.
Longer and lower arms will fix that? Interesting, since that doesn't make any sense on multiple fronts.
Well it rear steers in off cambers bumps and bunny hops in the whoops for starters. All things longer arms and lower pickup point would mitigate.
Stick around and you may learn why it does make sense.
Just give him a pat and bone so he quits barking and we adults can have civil discussion.
Sounds like a shock problem
Along with the regurgitation of a certain someone who imagines rear steer as something that is impactful.
Well it rear steers in off cambers bumps and bunny hops in the whoops for starters. All things longer arms and lower pickup point would mitigate.
I'm just gonna leave this here...
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do.
Bertrand Russell
There are or were several mid arm suspensions out there. The geometry has never had anything to do with a kit using that length of arm.Also, if mid arm is mentioned in this forums is it specifically related to the savvy "mid arm" kit or is it referring to arms in the 26" range that have similar geometry to the Savvy kit?
it's certainly unfortunate that we all suffer for the sins of a few.
Well it rear steers in off cambers bumps and bunny hops in the whoops for starters. All things longer arms and lower pickup point would mitigate.
Do you recall all the old discussions about why everyone should ditch the stock Haltenberger linkage or inverted Y? The reason they used to prove their point was the continually changing toe in setting. I have asked 100's of folks to give me one example, just one of any undesirable attribute they can discern behind the wheel when they are driving that tells them they are experiencing toe change. No one ever has or actually can because like rear steer on trails, if no one ever brought it up or pointed out that it even exists, it is a non issue.Why is it always talk about rear steer which is an issue in the fewest of circumstances?
If you manage to get down to SoCal in the next month, I have a TJ here you could take for a test drive. I suspect that if you were able to accomplish that, it would easily change your mind to where you would start qualifying that part with at least something along the lines of most but not all.Why not talk about roll steer which four inch lifted short arm TJs have in spades that actually contributes to poor handling?
Oddly, there is a lot of dissecting discussion about the Savvy mid-arm. For reasons unbeknownst to me, there always seems to be a very large memory block of where, how, and why that particular suspension came to be a product and why it even exists.The Savvy Mid Arm (and the much maligned short arm correction brackets) already reduces it to a significant degree that is not going to improve much more by making the arms any longer.
And you also understand that to make it better at going faster in the whoops you want to lower its antisquat which in turn makes it worse at steep climbs? If you really look at the Savvy Mid Arm it gets you as close to neutral antisquat within the packaging confines of the TJ/LJ platform which is what you want for an all around trail rig.