That doesn't look bad at all. I think the key is tucking them in. When they stick out way past the flares it starts looking too roller-skatey.
Looks good.
Up-travel appears to be sacrificed.
very sacraficed, it sits the way I got it (2.5" spacers only) eventually it'll be on 3" springs with 1.25 Savvy BL (have to do the cable shifter so I can do the body lift so I can do the raised Savvy GTS,have a line on springs via @Ocho )
It's more of a backwoods discovery vehicle (and DD) so all plans for it are overkill
IMO that should be ammended to 37s.
That doesn't look bad at all. I think the key is tucking them in. When they stick out way past the flares it starts looking too roller-skatey.
Forum guidebook says 37s require 12k worth of parts minimum. 35’s it is!
@firealley 33s are great. The Rubicon package should have been 33s and a 2.5in lift.
View attachment 408747
You missed that one completely, Dude. The key, obviously, is that it is Y-e-l-l-o-w……
![]()
Most people that want a big tire, don't want a skinny one. That's why very few companies make 34, 35" tires in the tiny 10.5" width. Most 15" options are C rated. The metric size tires go with stiff sidewalls for the heavy vehicles that usually run them. For what it's worth, all 35" BFG tires are 34" or less.
The Code panel doesn’t meet again for 2 more years. I held one last fall, then I forgot to show up and things sorta fell apart. This is all a lot more work than everyone thinks.
First I’ve heard of him
Forum guidebook says 37s require 12k worth of parts minimum. 35’s it is!
@firealley 33s are great. The Rubicon package should have been 33s and a 2.5in lift.
View attachment 408747