Although I still like them, I think I'd just go buy one of these new GT's and get that dealer installed supercharger option. Probably be money ahead in the end and performance and comfort isn't even in the same ballpark.
Very different cars that really aren't comparable. That's something that a lot of the older guys have trouble accepting. They tend to cling to the idea of a '60s muscle car being fast, but I can go to Honda today and buy a 4-cylinder Civic that will outperform an old Corvette in every performance metric, and that Honda will have A/C and a radio. But those old muscle cars have a style and soul that these new cars can't obtain. I guess that's why restomods are so popular, even though they tend to lose the soul aspect.
If you want fast, safe and comfortable, buy new. If you want cool, exciting and enjoyable, buy old. If you have too much money, restomod.
Very different cars that really aren't comparable. That's something that a lot of the older guys have trouble accepting. They tend to cling to the idea of a '60s muscle car being fast, but I can go to Honda today and buy a 4-cylinder Civic that will outperform an old Corvette in every performance metric, and that Honda will have A/C and a radio. But those old muscle cars have a style and soul that these new cars can't obtain. I guess that's why restomods are so popular, even though they tend to lose the soul aspect.
If you want fast, safe and comfortable, buy new. If you want cool, exciting and enjoyable, buy old. If you have too much money, restomod.
I'll take that 57 Chevy everyday over anything new just because of the style. If money wasn't an object I'd do a full frame off restomod with a new updated frame & God forbid maybe even a LS engine...
My buddies who build cars for people are doing so many LS powered restomod type vehicles, it's basically 80-90% of their businesses right now. Steve currently has 2 fist gen Camaros both getting new LS crate engines, one with a 6-speed, the other auto, and new frames from Art Morrison. $$$.
Brandon has basically been doing nothing but trucks lately, all LS swapped. A few weeks ago I was at his shop and counted 5 trucks, all junkyard LS swapped. Most of these trucks think they're a late model Tahoe.
Edit; I should add, Brandon has done so many of these trucks over the last 10 years, he can pump them out in just a few months. He was explaining to me that a certain generation of 2wd Tahoe will swap engine-trans-driveshaft, maybe rear axle too, straight into a short bed C10. I think he moves the motor mounts a few inches, but does nothing else. Then he has a guy strip out the unnecessary wiring and the ECU is flashed to shut down unnecessary stuff, so these trucks can be plugged up and serviced just like a late model. He told me if I want to do that with my '64 actual cost would be around $4,000, which is what I expect a SBC rebuild to cost with me doing most of the work. Decisions. Mechanical animal vs electronic monkey.
View attachment 555515
View attachment 555516
View attachment 555517
Sure goes a long way in explaining why I can't seem to find any shortbeds around...
He also knows the secret to cutting down a long bed, so they'll dry up too.
Funny you should mention that. I had the opportunity to top out my TJ a couple of weeks back for science (closed track, of course). Had a couple of miles of space. Would not break 100. No pics as I wasn't taking a hand off the wheel even though it felt remarkably smooth and steady....a stock TJ handles better at 90 , and we know how stupid 90 is in a TJ.......
Funny you should mention that. I had the opportunity to top out my TJ a couple of weeks back for science (closed track, of course). Had a couple of miles of space. Would not break 100. No pics as I wasn't taking a hand off the wheel even though it felt remarkably smooth and steady.
Would not break 100.
Mine is limited at about 95 or 96
The speed limit someplaces is 80 mph. I usually set the cruise 5 to 10 over.
My Jeep is a smooth, stable ride, but I have no interest in that speed in my Jeep. I doubt I've ever been over 75, and I won't hang out there long. 50-60 is my preferred speed.
Having said that, when I was younger (dumber) I determined a Honda of mine would hit a wall right at 145, she needs more power , and a particular Mustang was factory limited to 155 or 165, but she still had another gear to go. I also figured out the aerodynamics of a 3rd gen Dodge get a little funky at 110-120. I bet I haven't been above 90 in over a decade now, I'm smarter than that now. Also, I can't afford it.
My 3rd gen is ECM limited around 105
I think aerodynamic issues are pretty limiting. It’s interesting how big of an influence airflow has on performance and handling at speed in general. Although triple digit speed comes amazingly quickly in my 5.0 Mustang, it got very light in the front end around 120 in stock form. After lowering the car and adding and chin spoiler, stability at that pace went from scary to calm.
I think aerodynamic issues are pretty limiting. It’s interesting how big of an influence airflow has on performance and handling at speed in general.
I'm going to guess if I grabbed the tuner off my Mustang and put it on the TJ removing the limiter I'd be able to peg the speedo.
I wonder if I was hitting a limiter. It didn’t feel like the truck which pulls hard to the number and then obviously stumbles. The TJ just sort of faded.
You guys are crazy... I think I might have had my TJ up to 75 a few times and that is about it...