Car pics too cool not to share

They say everything's big in Texas. Poppycock. When it comes to truck motors, Lake Havasu City, Arizona, puts the Lone Star State to shame. That's where Big Mike Harrah has his treasure trove of trucks, cars, bikes, helicopters, and airplanes that makes gearheads drool with envy. His under-construction show truck has 36 butterflies in its 12 injector hats.

Why? "Because I can," Harrah says. There's no reason to take a 24V71 and build an intake manifold that weighs 1,000 pounds and mounts eight 6-71 superchargers on top of four others other than to say: There, take that. Yes, this is a V24 Detroit Diesel two-stroke (normally used to power ships), which is two V12 Detroits joined together nose to nose with splined cranks. It adds up to 1,704 ci. It's ridiculous, on a grand scale. And that's why it's cool.

Harrah is a trucking and construction businessman who has done very well for himself, and he decided to throw caution to the wind when it came to building his newest toy, a Peterbilt semi truck meant for the show circuit. The motor is obviously the focal point, and never one to shy away from the spotlight, Harrah went for broke. He claims this thing makes more than 3,400 hp, and there's a fairly popular YouTube video out to prove it, but we're a bit skeptical. It really doesn't matter how much power it makes—the visual is the key. But the torque figure has to be astronomical. Yes, it does run, though the truck itself was nothing more than huge framerails and a stretched cab when we saw it, so we haven't seen it motor down the road.

The key is the mammoth intake manifold, made from a lot of aluminum plate with trap doors inside to house both the blower drives and the pressure chambers. It's pretty complicated, and Harrah threatened to strangle us if we revealed how it was done—but you can figure it out if you think about it long enough. Credit the ingenuity of builders Tim Spinks and Paul Abram, the project management of Steve Huff, and some fabrication by Harrah himself for this outrageous statement.

 
  • Face Palm
Reactions: reddvltj
_nc_ohc=zF0fkCN9fpgAX8lnu0r&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.jpg
 

Squatch, you don't like the McLaren Mustang? Only 10 made.

In 1980, Mustangs, Camaros, or Corvettes were rolling around with V8s that could barely go over 150 horses and the future didn’t look too bright. However, a glimmer of hope came from the unlikely partnership between Ford and McLaren that resulted in 10 wild Fox bodies.

Due to the oil crises of the 1970s that crippled the economy and led to stricter emission regulations, the muscle car era seemed like a distant dream. To sell new cars, Detroit’s major corporation had to improvise, especially since people were getting tired of the economy-focused models that bored them to death.

At Ford, talks centered around making the third gen Mustang even more appealing. Introduced in 1978, it was an improvement over the hideous Pinto-based model that helped keep the company alive during the first half of the 1970s, and like its hideous predecessor, the Fox-body ‘Stang was selling like hotcakes. In 1979, dealers sold a whopping 369,936 units – the sixth-best sales year in the history of the nameplate, but there was room for more.

So how can you make the car even more popular? Build a ludicrous performance model, of course. We all know that this endeavor led to the creation of the Special Vehicle Operations Department and the 1984 Mustang SVO which was a terrific, yet underrated limited-production car, but the ludicrous performance model I’m alluding to was born several years earlier and it donned McLaren badges.

It all starts in 1980 when representatives of a marketing firm commissioned by Ford to explore the feasibility of a thoroughbred performance variant approached McLaren’s American division based in Livonia, Michigan, with the idea of creating an IMSA-spec race car and a series of closely-related, street-legal versions.

The idea quickly became the Ford-sanctioned M81 project, and in 1981 the race car made its debut at Daytona. With drivers Tom Klauser and John Morton taking turns behind the wheel, the McLaren-engineered Mustang managed to finish the 24-hour race, despite a crash in the early hours of the event. It crossed the finish line 21st but made headlines all across the globe for being patched up using countless rolls of duct tape.

Back in Livonia, McLaren engineers had finished 10 road-worthy cars, all heavily resembling the Daytona car. Hand-built from production on the stock hatchbacks that were previously stripped to the bare chassis, they featured bulging fender flairs, grille-less front ends, IMSA-style fiberglass hoods with massive scoops, and BBS wheels wrapped in Firestone HPR tires.

In addition, McLaren engineers beefed up the suspension with fully adjustable Koni shocks, stiffer springs, and sturdier anti-roll bars with tungsten bushings taken from the Fairmont police cruiser.

Inside, the cars were equipped with a roll cage, Recaro LS bucket seats, Stewart Warner instrumentation, and a Racemark steering wheel.

Unlike their competition-spec sibling that was powered by a legendary Cosworth BDA, the street Mustang McLarens were fitted with the 2.3-liter, turbocharged inline-four that Ford wanted to promote to its V8-loving customers. Linked to four-speed manuals, these units were blueprinted, received ported heads, and everything was meticulously fine-tuned by the engineering team with performance and reliability in mind.

To comply with emission regulations, boost was limited to 5 psi (0.34 bar) so the rated output stood at only 132 hp – the same figure as the standard-spec 2.3-liter turbos. However, the engines were more than capable of handling a lot more. Two of the cars were fitted with boost gauges and their turbos could go all the way up to 10 psi (0.69 bar), which translated into close to 180 ponies.

Legend has it that, with more time and money, McLaren could have pushed the four-cylinder well over the 200-hp mark, making it more powerful than Ford’s 5.0 V8, but, unfortunately, that never happened.

Although the blue oval’s decision-makers were extremely pleased with the M81 project and a limited production run of 249 units was seriously considered, they ultimately chose to redirect funds to the SVO division which was also developing a performance-oriented ‘Stang.

The completed cars were sold for $25,000 ($79,000 today) each, and now and again, one goes under the hammer. In 2020, chassis number 0F03A308227 was sold at a Barrett-Jackson event for only $37,400.

By today’s standards, calling the Mustang McLaren M81 a performance car is laughable. Its output figure wasn’t particularly mind-blowing four decades ago either, but it is unquestionably the wildest-looking Fox-body of them all. It helped pave the way for the fantastic SVO that hit the streets in 1984 and we can only wonder what could have transpired if Ford would have signed off on further development.

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/...fox-body-that-we-need-to-remember-187166.html
 
Squatch, you don't like the McLaren Mustang? Only 10 made.

In 1980, Mustangs, Camaros, or Corvettes were rolling around with V8s that could barely go over 150 horses and the future didn’t look too bright. However, a glimmer of hope came from the unlikely partnership between Ford and McLaren that resulted in 10 wild Fox bodies.

Due to the oil crises of the 1970s that crippled the economy and led to stricter emission regulations, the muscle car era seemed like a distant dream. To sell new cars, Detroit’s major corporation had to improvise, especially since people were getting tired of the economy-focused models that bored them to death.

At Ford, talks centered around making the third gen Mustang even more appealing. Introduced in 1978, it was an improvement over the hideous Pinto-based model that helped keep the company alive during the first half of the 1970s, and like its hideous predecessor, the Fox-body ‘Stang was selling like hotcakes. In 1979, dealers sold a whopping 369,936 units – the sixth-best sales year in the history of the nameplate, but there was room for more.

So how can you make the car even more popular? Build a ludicrous performance model, of course. We all know that this endeavor led to the creation of the Special Vehicle Operations Department and the 1984 Mustang SVO which was a terrific, yet underrated limited-production car, but the ludicrous performance model I’m alluding to was born several years earlier and it donned McLaren badges.

It all starts in 1980 when representatives of a marketing firm commissioned by Ford to explore the feasibility of a thoroughbred performance variant approached McLaren’s American division based in Livonia, Michigan, with the idea of creating an IMSA-spec race car and a series of closely-related, street-legal versions.

The idea quickly became the Ford-sanctioned M81 project, and in 1981 the race car made its debut at Daytona. With drivers Tom Klauser and John Morton taking turns behind the wheel, the McLaren-engineered Mustang managed to finish the 24-hour race, despite a crash in the early hours of the event. It crossed the finish line 21st but made headlines all across the globe for being patched up using countless rolls of duct tape.

Back in Livonia, McLaren engineers had finished 10 road-worthy cars, all heavily resembling the Daytona car. Hand-built from production on the stock hatchbacks that were previously stripped to the bare chassis, they featured bulging fender flairs, grille-less front ends, IMSA-style fiberglass hoods with massive scoops, and BBS wheels wrapped in Firestone HPR tires.

In addition, McLaren engineers beefed up the suspension with fully adjustable Koni shocks, stiffer springs, and sturdier anti-roll bars with tungsten bushings taken from the Fairmont police cruiser.

Inside, the cars were equipped with a roll cage, Recaro LS bucket seats, Stewart Warner instrumentation, and a Racemark steering wheel.

Unlike their competition-spec sibling that was powered by a legendary Cosworth BDA, the street Mustang McLarens were fitted with the 2.3-liter, turbocharged inline-four that Ford wanted to promote to its V8-loving customers. Linked to four-speed manuals, these units were blueprinted, received ported heads, and everything was meticulously fine-tuned by the engineering team with performance and reliability in mind.

To comply with emission regulations, boost was limited to 5 psi (0.34 bar) so the rated output stood at only 132 hp – the same figure as the standard-spec 2.3-liter turbos. However, the engines were more than capable of handling a lot more. Two of the cars were fitted with boost gauges and their turbos could go all the way up to 10 psi (0.69 bar), which translated into close to 180 ponies.

Legend has it that, with more time and money, McLaren could have pushed the four-cylinder well over the 200-hp mark, making it more powerful than Ford’s 5.0 V8, but, unfortunately, that never happened.

Although the blue oval’s decision-makers were extremely pleased with the M81 project and a limited production run of 249 units was seriously considered, they ultimately chose to redirect funds to the SVO division which was also developing a performance-oriented ‘Stang.

The completed cars were sold for $25,000 ($79,000 today) each, and now and again, one goes under the hammer. In 2020, chassis number 0F03A308227 was sold at a Barrett-Jackson event for only $37,400.

By today’s standards, calling the Mustang McLaren M81 a performance car is laughable. Its output figure wasn’t particularly mind-blowing four decades ago either, but it is unquestionably the wildest-looking Fox-body of them all. It helped pave the way for the fantastic SVO that hit the streets in 1984 and we can only wonder what could have transpired if Ford would have signed off on further development.

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/...fox-body-that-we-need-to-remember-187166.html

I liked what the McLaren Mustangs represented, I just don't like the way they "presented'. The nose treatment was less than stellar, the hood was hideous, and the rest of it was "eh". And on that particular example, the color does nothing for me. I definitely like the later SVO much, much better.
 
Those Ardun heads and blowers look great. The sad part is, even with blowers and "Ardun" heads, these old fatties are barely squeezing out ~300 hp. :( Of course, the flathead guys will describe that as "torq-ie". ;)

Well at least that's 300 gross h.p. :sneaky: They do look cool , but it's like the blown Chevy six bangers , it's a lot of money for an engine a stock 350 could blow away.
It is fun though !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wildman and BlueC
Well at least that's 300 gross h.p. :sneaky: They do look cool , but it's like the blown Chevy six bangers , it's a lot of money for an engine a stock 350 could blow away.
It is fun though !

The "cool factor" beats the overdone and worn-out 350/350 combo seen on far too many street rods, in my opinion. But you know what they say about opinions...;)
 
Well at least that's 300 gross h.p. :sneaky: They do look cool , but it's like the blown Chevy six bangers , it's a lot of money for an engine a stock 350 could blow away.
It is fun though !

Yep, my dad dropped something like $1,500 on a pair of aluminum heads for his flathead when it was being rebuilt. That might have netted a whopping 15hp, but he says it's "torqu-ie". ;) :LOL:

Everything is coated in body shop glitter in this pic, so it looks a little crusty. Also, I hate those flex hoses. Maybe I should "find" a leak with them. :unsure:
KIMG0940.JPG
 
The "cool factor" beats the overdone and worn-out 350/350 combo seen on far too many street rods, in my opinion. But you know what they say about opinions...;)

I agree ! , of course have you noticed everyone who dogs the 350/350 never says anything about a another 9 " hung on a 4-link with coilovers ?
And let us not forget it should all be in a Banana Yellow 32 Ford coupe ! :oops:
 
It is probably the first time I’ve heard the word “slacks” in 30 years.

It has been quite a while for me too but now I got this snippet of one of too many songs my mom had in her favorites playlist.


And this wasn't actually her playlist but everyone's looked pretty much the same.
45 playlist.jpg
 
I agree ! , of course have you noticed everyone who dogs the 350/350 never says anything about a another 9 " hung on a 4-link with coilovers ?

Would a 350/350/35 combo be better? :unsure: ;)

For what it's worth, I have no problem with a SBC, but I'm no fan of a 350 trans, but they are cheap and generally reliable.
 
Last edited: