Car pics too cool not to share

*How can someone tell if it's an SS clone? I'm not well-versed on the subject. Will the answer be the same for Chevelles and Camaros, as well?

Well for starters true SS cars had other equipment added not just the engine , true of all real SS Camaros, & Novas would be multi leaf rear springs , faster ratio steering box , front disc brakes , and 12 Bolt rear axle . Chevelles had the same minus the rear leaf springs.
 
Well for starters true SS cars had other equipment added not just the engine , true of all real SS Camaros, & Novas would be multi leaf rear springs , faster ratio steering box , front disc brakes , and 12 Bolt rear axle . Chevelles had the same minus the rear leaf springs.

Cool! I didn't know any of that. Thanks, brother! (y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: reddvltj
Well, actually...those aren't tribal flames. The Nova has what are typically referred to as "Real Fire" or "True Fire" flames. Below are examples of what are commonly referred to as tribal flames.

*How can someone tell if it's an SS clone? I'm not well-versed on the subject. Will the answer be the same for Chevelles and Camaros, as well?

View attachment 547812View attachment 547813View attachment 547814View attachment 547815

Thanks for the tribal instruction ! I guess I like the traditional white outlined flame job best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wildman and Squatch
Kickin' it old school...

1722736752303.png
1722736786006.png
1722736823353.png
1722736880253.png
1722736925311.png
 
Everyone's computer controlled cards Sucked ! Ford had variable venturi carbs , MoPar had Lean Burn . Definitely a low point in automotive development !

I'm familiar with MoPars lean burn system and GMs OBD-0/electronic carbs, but other than name, the Ford “Variable Venturi” is new to me. Reading this article ( https://www.onallcylinders.com/2023/10/25/vee-veefords-innovative-variable-venturi-carburetor/ ) makes it seem like it uses a vacuum operated restrictor plate or maybe a something like a vacuum secondary on a 4-barrel. Is that accurate? If so, it sounds like it should be an efficient carb, at least for the general public street use. What was the main problem(s)?

Looking at the pics of one, I’ve seen one in person, I believe sitting on my buddies bench. I remember looking at the butterfly valves and thinking that was different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: reddvltj and 5632
The 1970 Chevrolet Camaro Baldwin Motion Stage III stands as a pinnacle of American muscle car history, embodying the golden age of performance and style. Born from a collaboration between Baldwin Chevrolet, a prominent Long Island dealership, and Motion Performance, led by the legendary Joel Rosen, this vehicle was engineered to push the boundaries of speed and power. At its core was the formidable 454 cubic inch (7.4-liter) big-block V8 engine, capable of delivering over 450 horsepower, with some builds reputed to exceed 500 horsepower. This powerhouse engine was meticulously modified with a high-performance camshaft, specialized cylinder heads, heavy-duty connecting rods, and a precision-tuned carburetor, ensuring exceptional acceleration and top-end speed.
The Stage III package didn't just enhance the Camaro's engine; it also revolutionized its handling. Upgraded suspension components, including heavy-duty shocks, springs, and sway bars, were coupled with high-performance disc brakes to provide superior stopping power. Reinforced chassis elements ensured stability, making the Camaro Stage III as adept on the track as it was on the street.
Visually, the Baldwin Motion Camaro Stage III was a head-turner. It featured bold paint schemes, often adorned with custom striping and graphics that made each car unique. Specialized badging and custom body modifications, such as distinctive hood scoops and spoilers, further set it apart from its peers. These cars were not mass-produced but were built in limited numbers, adding to their allure and making each one a rare gem in the collector's market.

Today, the 1970 Baldwin Motion Camaro Stage III is a highly sought-after classic, revered for its performance, craftsmanship, and unique styling. Its legacy is a testament to an era when American muscle cars ruled the roads with unmatched power and charisma, and its place in automotive history remains firmly cemented as one of the most iconic and revered muscle cars ever built. Collectors and enthusiasts value these cars not only for their impressive performance credentials but also for their historical significance and the indelible mark they left on the world of high-performance automobiles.
1722792487829.png
 
I'm familiar with MoPars lean burn system and GMs OBD-0/electronic carbs, but other than name, the Ford “Variable Venturi” is new to me. Reading this article ( https://www.onallcylinders.com/2023/10/25/vee-veefords-innovative-variable-venturi-carburetor/ ) makes it seem like it uses a vacuum operated restrictor plate or maybe a something like a vacuum secondary on a 4-barrel. Is that accurate? If so, it sounds like it should be an efficient carb, at least for the general public street use. What was the main problem(s)?

Looking at the pics of one, I’ve seen one in person, I believe sitting on my buddies bench. I remember looking at the butterfly valves and thinking that was different.
I've had two '77 Thunderbirds with these carburetors. The one I drove didn't have any issues, and the other one was a quick-flip, so other than knowing that it ran great when I bought it, I couldn't comment on it. Still, I'd heard that they weren't a good carb at all, and that most folks would be better off swapping 'em out. As for the Lean Burn cars, every MoPar that I ever bought that had that system on it originally had already had it modified/eliminated by the time it got to me. I found that to be a fairly telling testament to the reliability of the systems.
1722794548350.png
1722794584977.png
1722794646111.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueC and reddvltj
I'm familiar with MoPars lean burn system and GMs OBD-0/electronic carbs, but other than name, the Ford “Variable Venturi” is new to me. Reading this article ( https://www.onallcylinders.com/2023/10/25/vee-veefords-innovative-variable-venturi-carburetor/ ) makes it seem like it uses a vacuum operated restrictor plate or maybe a something like a vacuum secondary on a 4-barrel. Is that accurate? If so, it sounds like it should be an efficient carb, at least for the general public street use. What was the main problem(s)?

Looking at the pics of one, I’ve seen one in person, I believe sitting on my buddies bench. I remember looking at the butterfly valves and thinking that was different.

There was a reason you saw one on a bench. Even my Ford Fanboi's back in the day hated them . If you like surging , bucking , flat spots and a different problem every time you drove your Ford , this is the carb for you .
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueC and Wildman