How much flex is there now with the stock bar? The additional amount that the FC would provide should be about equal to the amount of its spring travel from neutral.
The tuning springs shouldn't change this unless their solid heights are different between each other.
Is what's in this video anywhere close to the reality? Watch it all the way through. They do a "flex test".
I haven't watched any of the videos nor have I read the whole thread except for a couple of responses later and the first page or so. You asked if you were out there regarding something, summarize that for me. I'm gathering that we are talking about a flexible link on the swaybar to aid in something?The concepts seem right. Though the accuracy of the measurements from their flex test on an uneven surface are questionable.
The video says there is 2.3"of travel in the link. This should mean about 1.15" either direction. There would be some trigonometry involved to explain why the wheel travel would exceed that amount.
Near the end, there is mention of high, medium and low travels from the tuning springs. I noticed that the wire diameters look different, which (assuming the free lengths are the same) suggests that the solid heights of the coils are different. This should explain why there are differences in travel. Each tuning spring has a different travel along with a different rate, meaning that the short travel high rate coil is the least different from stock. The longer travel low rate coil is going to be the most different than stock.
That is how I am interpreting what I see.
I haven't watched any of the videos nor have I read the whole thread except for a couple of responses later and the first page or so. You asked if you were out there regarding something, summarize that for me. I'm gathering that we are talking about a flexible link on the swaybar to aid in something?
Are we talking about something like the Walker Evans' Swaybar Links that have been around for quite awhile?
Why quit now?Hmmm, should I drink the koolaid?