Filtered?Smoking, as in charged with filtered smoke leaking out the top?
Filtered?Smoking, as in charged with filtered smoke leaking out the top?
I ain't gonna judge.Correct. He was preparing for a long meeting.
Ya, I assume he had water in the bong. Isn't that what the water is for? filtering out the "bad" stuff like tar. No experience, asking for a friend (it's not boog)Filtered?
KInd of. Usually to cool it down and remove any ash that goes through the stem.Ya, I assume he had water in the bong. Isn't that what the water is for? filtering out the "bad" stuff like tar. No experience, asking for a friend (it's not boog)
That's why you get a search warrant, to prove what is or isn't in that bag. If you already had proof you wouldn't need the warrant. Search warrants are granted all the time on far less. "Reasonable suspicion" is all you need, and some judges are more reasonable than others.
In law, what is the difference/distinction between the two?Reasonable suspicion is not sufficient; probable cause is needed to obtain a search warrant.
PC is a higher standard.In law, what is the difference/distinction between the two?
Starting with-PC is a higher standard.
In my experience, it would be necessary for an investigator to go further and gather additional facts (more than the posted picture) to establish probable cause to get a search warrant (if one was actually obtained).
Most likely yes to any picture data. Most folks do not turn off geo meta data on their phone. The only way to scrub meta data is to drop the original jpg, tiff, raw etc layer onto a new “image”. An exif reader will display all the info including the name of the phone that was attached to the camera. Photoshop, bridge, Lightroom, etc all have the ability to read this info. Some proprietary apps can too. Apple tried its hand with aperture. Not sure if it is still available or if anyone uses it.Starting with-
Do we know whose home that pic was taken in?
Do we know that the box in the picture contains anything?
Do we know who took the picture?
Do we even know what State the picture was taken in?
PC is a higher standard.
In my experience, it would be necessary for an investigator to go further and gather additional facts (more than the posted picture) to establish probable cause to get a search warrant (if one was actually obtained).
I helped do that for jtf 6 in the Angeles National Forrest, lots of flir work because the pot gave off a specific heat signature. But that was 20 years ago, tech has changed a lot and people are more crafty. I should quantify that with we were flying UH-1sYes, now you are getting into the other factors they use. But it is not correct to just do a thermal fly over survey and go bust a grow operation.
It could be his loaded insulin syringe with a bag of epsom salt for a lovely candle light bath while smoking his medical marijuana. Let he without sin cast the first stone!It could be any number of things. There is exactly zero to be learned from just a picture of a bag with white shit in it except "hey, there's a bag with some white shit in it".