Can’t watch it right now, wasn’t it this
https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/je...during-oil-change-cars-owner-pays-nothing.amp
Yep. If you don't know how to operate the machinery, you shouldn't touch it. Be that a Jeep or a (vertical) smartphone!...nexus of stupidity.
I'd sue the coworker that couldn't use a clutch.
Yep. If you don't know how to operate the machinery, you shouldn't touch it. Be that a Jeep or a (vertical) smartphone!
Moreso talking about the 2 Michigan laws:
1. You or your estate can't sue your boss if you're injured or killed due to THEIR negligence (such as negligence in hiring a 19 year old who's never driven a stick or held a driver's license...to drive and work on cars)
2. The owner of the vehicle is liable for any damages involving their vehicle, even when it's being used by someone else, as long as that someone else had the owners permission.
and I'm not sure there was a specific law about it, but the kid wasn't considered negligent, his action was considered a mistake...so he wasn't legally liable for it either.
So under Michigan law, the Jeep owner was liable by giving permission to the employee to drive the vehicle, the driver made a mistake but wasn't negligent, and the dealer couldn't be sued. So there was no option left for the family but to sue the owner, who then sought (and was awarded) indemnity from the dealer (as I'd bet the plaintiff and their attorney expected). In the end, the right thing happened, though I wish the article posted went into more detail on the legal basis and logic used by the judge to make that decision without leaving a huge opening to be overturned in an appeal.
Wow. This is why Laws, rules, regulations, and "morals" aren't perfect and can't replace ethics.
Look up Florida medical malpractice laws... Doctors can screw you up really good there, and they only are subject to a $300k payout...
Look up Florida medical malpractice laws... Doctors can screw you up really good there, and they only are subject to a $300k payout...
Look up Florida medical malpractice laws... Doctors can screw you up really good there, and they only are subject to a $300k payout...
Isn't there also a 3 strikes rule though, that they lose their license to practice? Or was that another state? My college roommate went on to become a doctor and talked about that at some point.
Each state has its own rules regarding discipline and what is necessary to revoke a license.
I can say unequivocally that med mal is essential to have to prevent/eliminate wayward practitioners. However, without a doubt it leads to an abundance of frivolous lawsuits for no real malpractice filed by plaintiffs trying to get get rich quick and greedy lawyers who are willing to go along with it....throw tons of b.s. at the wall and an uneducated jury "of your own peers" will give some one with a sob story a boat load of $ that doesn't deserve it. That result actually hurts all of us.
Wrong.
There is no cap in Florida for economic or non economic damages. Together, Rewards can easily surpass 300k.
The Florida legislature is lobbied heavily by attorneys. I've see it first hand. Attorneys spend a lot of $ to have the laws favor them and med mal is a perfect example.
https://grossmanattorneys.com/is-there-a-cap-on-medical-malpractice-claims-in-florida/#:~:text=In Florida, there are no,the damages cannot be limited.
https://www.thefloridalawgroup.com/court-strikes-down-caps-on-malpractice-damages/
https://www.wilsonlaw.com/blog/the-...tice-claims-involving-more-than-one-claimant/
just fyi @Zorba there is no such law referenced in the above post.
If you are looking for fair, Earth is the wrong planet.
To echo @Zorba, people generally know what right and wrong is. The world would be idyllic if everyone just did what they know is right.