...
It also might be worth adding that a lot of the bolt-on long arm lifts make the belly hang lower than it would otherwise, if you had a short arm lift and a tummy tuck.
There is a piece of this that needs to be looked at more. But first...
If the angle of the arms seen on our lifted Jeeps is not enough to significantly effect the ride quality, then are there any other reasons to mess with the arm length?
Occasionally, I'll bring up terms like instant center and antisquat. It would be interesting to know what these are and what they mean on a stock TJ and then on a lifted TJ on short arms.Good question, one to which I don't have the answer. Savvy seems to have had a lot of success with their mid-arm kit, which seems to be a happy compromise between a short arm and a long arm. I haven't heard anything bad about it from anyone who runs it, including you and @John Beard.
They obviously have a reason for doing the mid-arm lift, which makes me curious as to what there is to be gained from a longer arm, aside from the "ride quality" that isn't an issue at 4" of lift.
A interesting question that often asked by the doubters is how much angle is too much angle?It is my assumption that a long arm lift would make more sense for lift heights above 6". when you start approaching that kind of lift height, then I would think the short arm's angles might play a role.
Occasionally, I'll bring up terms like instant center and antisquat. It would be interesting to know what these are and what they mean on a stock TJ and then on a lifted TJ on short arms.
it's mostly academic, but I can't be the only one who knows just enough to be irritating.Why do I have a feeling that you already know the answer, you're just holding back...
I can't be the only one.
That's a major point I've pushed countless times for longer than many here have been Jeep owners.Blaine has stated many times that the control arm angle at 4" of suspension lift (which is what most of us run at the most) isn't a contributing factor in regards to negatively impacting the ride quality.
I've known all along your questions in this thread have been purely rhetorical.it's mostly academic, but I can't be the only one who knows just enough to be irritating.
I've known all along your questions in this thread have been purely rhetorical.it's mostly academic, but I can't be the only one who knows just enough to be irritating.
That's a major point I've pushed countless times for longer than many here have been Jeep owners.
I agree. For a very brief time when I was experimenting with a few ideas, I went from 2" to 3" to 4" of lift on the factory arms. The ride didn't change. If the shocks hadn't been too short for that ride height, I would have kept it that way a little longer.In all reality though, I think that's why most new Wrangler owners are buying long arm lifts instead of short arm lifts. They're buying into the myth / bogus marketing that a long arm lift will provide a better quality ride.
I found it minutes ago. There looks to be a lot of good animations on the channel with really good simple explanations.Brilliant video.
I agree. For a very brief time when I was experimenting with a few ideas, I went from 2" to 3" to 4" of lift on the factory arms. The ride didn't change. If the shocks hadn't been too short for that ride height, I would have kept it that way a little longer.
Likely the same reason I've wanted one since Blaine's first prototype was installed into one of his TJs which I was invited to drive... reading Blaine's description of it and talking with Blaine to learn more about it.At what point did you realize you needed (or was it wanted?) the mid-arm setup? Did you have an actual need for it, or was it something you did just because you had the funds? I'm genuinely curious.