Why does it have to be this way? Why?Both sets of tires were at 8psi. Try again.
Why does it have to be this way? Why?Both sets of tires were at 8psi. Try again.
Why does it have to be this way? Why?
That right there is the problem. It's akin to hunting flies with a 12 gauge shotgun loaded with #9 birdshot and telling the guy with the flyswatter how awesome he is.Can you imagine if you brought up Johnson Valley?
What is happening is folks build rigs instead of learning how to drive. I see it all the time. If the price of admission is 35's like many of the trails in JV, the fucktards who can't drive show up on 37's and 40's and follow the 35" tire rigs around.It seem strange to me that I sucessfully completed the Rubicon Trail the first time on 31's and the second time on 32's but now Jeep Jamboree says that 35-40" tires are required to run that trial as a participant. (Jeepers Jamboree requires at least 33" tires.)
Did the Rubicon become that much more difficult over the years? Or is it that our perception of minimum necessary tire size for rockcrawling has changed? (I'm not talking about competition or extreme rockcrawling, I'm talking about rockcrawling for ordinary mortals/weekend enthusiasts who might rock crawl one weekend and overland the next.) I know that Jeep Jamboree wants large tires to make their lives easier as event organizers, but is the Rubicon really a 35-40" tire trail or is it a 31" tire trail or is it something in between?
Just wondering (as I fondly gaze at my 35's).
The other thing for the Rubicon is the JK Unlimited and similar wheelbase rigs will struggle with the average driver on stock tires.It seem strange to me that I sucessfully completed the Rubicon Trail the first time on 31's and the second time on 32's but now Jeep Jamboree says that 35-40" tires are required to run that trial as a participant. (Jeepers Jamboree requires at least 33" tires.)
Did the Rubicon become that much more difficult over the years? Or is it that our perception of minimum necessary tire size for rockcrawling has changed? (I'm not talking about competition or extreme rockcrawling, I'm talking about rockcrawling for ordinary mortals/weekend enthusiasts who might rock crawl one weekend and overland the next.) I know that Jeep Jamboree wants large tires to make their lives easier as event organizers, but is the Rubicon really a 35-40" tire trail or is it a 31" tire trail or is it something in between?
Just wondering (as I fondly gaze at my 35's).
Gerald is being a big advocate of the Wildpeak M/T these days.I didn't think you were an advocate, just looking to make some easy money is all.
The other thing for the Rubicon is the JK Unlimited and similar wheelbase rigs will struggle with the average driver on stock tires.
That's funny because I always see people commenting about how they did it on 31's with no problem.Depends on how gracefully you want to negotiate the trail. Sure, you can run the Con on 32's, but you won't be doing it gracefully, or unassisted.
@mrblaine I’ve never seen any of your opinions or recommendations on tires. Maybe I’ve missed them. From your experience, any recommendations for a 35” tire that sees both on and off-road duty? I know it’s a broad question and location plays a roll but limit it to a JV/highway standpoint if needed.What is happening is folks build rigs instead of learning how to drive. I see it all the time. If the price of admission is 35's like many of the trails in JV, the fucktards who can't drive show up on 37's and 40's and follow the 35" tire rigs around.
Guess it's my off road inexperience shinning thru. My 2nd trip thru the trail had a little less drama on 33's, a bit more lift, and a baby tummy tuck.That'
That's funny because I always see people commenting about how they did it on 31's with no problem.
Guess it's my off road inexperience shinning thru.
I wouldn't say that. The trail is different every year and changes through the season with traffic.
I had last been on the Rubicon in 2009, on 35s and Dana 30/Dana 44. WE went back in 2018 and I was on 37s. I was surprised at how "hard" it was, I didnt remember it being as dug out, or maybe just rocks rolling around enough to be challenging? It was fun, great wheeling.It seem strange to me that I sucessfully completed the Rubicon Trail the first time on 31's and the second time on 32's but now Jeep Jamboree says that 35-40" tires are required to run that trial as a participant. (Jeepers Jamboree requires at least 33" tires.)
Did the Rubicon become that much more difficult over the years? Or is it that our perception of minimum necessary tire size for rockcrawling has changed? (I'm not talking about competition or extreme rockcrawling, I'm talking about rockcrawling for ordinary mortals/weekend enthusiasts who might rock crawl one weekend and overland the next.) I know that Jeep Jamboree wants large tires to make their lives easier as event organizers, but is the Rubicon really a 35-40" tire trail or is it a 31" tire trail or is it something in between?
Just wondering (as I fondly gaze at my 35's).
...
My Fullstack partner runs 33s on his driver TJ, and they wore VERY fast. They aren't the best tire, but I think they are a good tire for the price for sure.
...
That's terrible. I don't think Kevin's is that bad, I'll ask him.Mine lasted 8k miles, and I'm being very generous with the mileage. They went on in April and became dangerously worn by late-September. Six months. Fortunately mine came with set of wheels making the tires effectively free.