fourpointzero
TJ Addict
Like most topics today.Jesus…. Hot button topic![]()
It's quite amusing how 'serious' we can take the topics. First world problems, you could say. Heck, this is similar the, "tire carrier or no tire carrier?" post.
Like most topics today.Jesus…. Hot button topic![]()
Or put another way, those of you who think you know what you are talking about really tend to annoy those of us who do know what we are talking about and that's when the crap starts.Mostly "hot button" topics happen because someone will come along with a black and white viewpoint and say my thing is best and all others (suck, are a waste of money, are ugly, etc). That causes an uproar because real life is very rarely black and white. I ran a flooded lead acid starting battery until it died (about 4 years) and replaced it with an AGM with dual Terminals.
Once again, these were originally meant for non-serviceable and hard to get to area's. The first commercial-civilian use was power back-up on transmission towers in remote locations with extreme weather conditions regular lead/acid would boil out if not maintained. It is still just a Lead Acid Battery. Here's a history lesson for those who want to know. AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) sealed battery technology was originally invented in 1980, and developed and introduced in 1985 for military aircraft where power, weight, safety, and reliability were paramount considerations. The Concorde AGM batteries are VRSLAB (Valve Regulated Sealed Lead-Acid Battery), sometimes referred to as VRLA (Valve Regulated Lead-Acid). Several manufacturers now produce AGM batteries, but Concorde was the first to develop the technology for commercial non-military use.Or put another way, those of you who think you know what you are talking about really tend to annoy those of us who do know what we are talking about and that's when the crap starts.
I am aware of the history just as I am aware of the history of the Jeep we all drive. The TJ iteration has about as much in common with the original as today's AGM versions do to the original intended solution.Once again, these were originally meant for non-serviceable and hard to get to area's. The first commercial-civilian use was power back-up on transmission towers in remote locations with extreme weather conditions regular lead/acid would boil out if not maintained. It is still just a Lead Acid Battery. Here's a history lesson for those who want to know. AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) sealed battery technology was originally invented in 1980, and developed and introduced in 1985 for military aircraft where power, weight, safety, and reliability were paramount considerations. The Concorde AGM batteries are VRSLAB (Valve Regulated Sealed Lead-Acid Battery), sometimes referred to as VRLA (Valve Regulated Lead-Acid). Several manufacturers now produce AGM batteries, but Concorde was the first to develop the technology for commercial non-military use.
Now I see that I should have jumped on this with both feet and much harder. No, all lead acid batteries are NOT the same at all, not even a tiny bit. Using your dumbass definition, that means we should be able use a gel cell deep cycle marine battery for SLI use and that is simply not the case. While they do have a higher depth of discharge than a flooded cell, they don't accept high current charge rates very well and that tends to be their undoing along with their limited ability to deliver high current.Please tell us, what are the benefits. these batteries were originally designed for radio transmission towers as back-up power supply
in very remote areas where techs, would not be able to top off batteries with distilled water on a regular schedule. other then that all lead-acid batteries are the same.
You're not an idiot but to assume that a factory puts the exact same number of plates with the same purity level stacked to the same rate in every single battery and the only thing that changes is the color of the case is short sighted at best.There are three major automotive starting flooded battery manufacturers in the United States. There are four absorbed glass-mat (AGM) starting battery manufacturers and there are four flooded deep cycle battery/major deep cycle battery manufacturers in the United States. There are 6 lead mines in the US, so really not much differences in manufacturers, just what is put in what case. But I guess I am an idiot..
Both of the batteries you mention are relabeled Deka Intimidators from EastPenn. The same as the Duracell that Sam's Club sells for $169. Why spend more? (Other than you hate Wal-Mart / Sam's...which I can't fault anyone for.)I run an Autozone 34AGM battery, I got a good deal on it and I used to shop at Autozone allot. It was a bit under $200. My next battery will probably be the O'Reilly AGM, I think the one @tworley mentioned. It's still $200 and I shop there more often now. I'd buy the cheapest AGM you can find from a nation wide auto parts store you like. Batteries fail and just getting a ride to a local store and swapping it out is so much better than dealing with some fancy online battery that needs to be delivered, especially if you are on a trip somewhere wheeling.
Yes, I totally Agree with you you can run battery on it's side or even up-side down just do it while wearing your 5 POINT RESTRAINT HA-HA.I am aware of the history just as I am aware of the history of the Jeep we all drive. The TJ iteration has about as much in common with the original as today's AGM versions do to the original intended solution.
Yes, they are in fact lead acid batteries in the tightest definition but the only aspect that really matters for what we need is the fact that you can run one laying on its side and you can't do that with a conventional lead acid battery because all the fucking electrolyte will run out.
That and the history is meaningless since all we need is something that doesn't let acid spill, doesn't weep acid to corrode the crap out of the terminals and doesn't cost a fortune.

Dumb isn't a good look on you, stop it.Yes, I totally Agree with you you can run battery on it's side or even up-side down just do it while wearing your 5 POINT RESTRAINT HA-HA.
.
View attachment 290038
Your talking about plate thickness for starting vs deep cycling. The chemistry is identical for ION Exchange in any Lead Acid battery which has 2 forms of Lead 1-Lead plate and 2- Lead sponge and sulfuric acid is the ION transfer medium.Now I see that I should have jumped on this with both feet and much harder. No, all lead acid batteries are NOT the same at all, not even a tiny bit. Using your dumbass definition, that means we should be able use a gel cell deep cycle marine battery for SLI use and that is simply not the case. While they do have a higher depth of discharge than a flooded cell, they don't accept high current charge rates very well and that tends to be their undoing along with their limited ability to deliver high current.
The vast majority of SLI compatible AGM batteries even with higher depth of discharge and number of cycles have very good current supply ability even though they qualify as a "deep cycle" battery. They also have the potential for a much higher charge capacity that will ruin a conventional lead acid. If you want to figure that out the easy way, simply put one as the other half of the pair in a diesel pick up that runs dual batteries from the factory. The low resistance and ability to handle a higher inrush current will boil the acid out of the conventional in very short order. That isn't speculation or supposition, but real world actual I have seen it with my own two eyes. And, even with the acid completely boiled out of the conventional, the single AGM kept starting the rig.
Which changes exactly nothing for what we need.Your talking about plate thickness for starting vs deep cycling. The chemistry is identical for ION Exchange in any Lead Acid battery which has 2 forms of Lead 1-Lead plate and 2- Lead sponge and sulfuric acid is the ION transfer medium.
The marine thing looks interesting, those seem to be everywhere.By the way, the Duracell Group 34M (marine) AGM is only $119.
That’s the battery I’m running, primarily for the extra terminals. So far, so good.The marine thing looks interesting, those seem to be everywhere.
I wonder why the CCA values are over 200 amps lower on those even though they are slightly larger (at least the few I checked)?A group 24 fits too.
Because they're not optimized for high current draw, they're optimized for deep discharge.I wonder why the CCA values are over 200 amps lower on those even though they are slightly larger (at least the few I checked)?
