I have the same opinion of both: Completely stupid, useless, and pointless.
I'm with you, 100%. I remember my Motorola StarTac back in 2000. That was enough for all of us!
I have the same opinion of both: Completely stupid, useless, and pointless.
I'm with you, 100%. I remember my Motorola StarTac back in 2000. That was enough for all of us!
View attachment 675170
I bough my first cell phone in 1989, a Panasonic "Bag phone". I used it until the G1/analog turnoff in 2007. I'd still be using it if that hadn't happened. No battery worries and incredible range. Used it a few times offshore, could hit a shore based cell tower from 30 miles out!
Have you seen these?
https://rapidradios.com/
I've been considering buying them. I always remember how much I loved my Nextel push-to-talk phone in the early 2000s.
Hmmmm - maybe worth a thought. My current phone has PTT capability, although I've never had a need for it. But the "connect to ANY cell service" sounds interesting, need to look at it some more.
Because we're using cellular data, we do incur costs. We cover those costs by charging $50/year per radio after the first year (the first year is included). That's an entire year of cellular service for what most people pay per month for their cellphones, AND you're getting access to ALL of the network providers at that price (not just 1). If they are going to be used out of the country, it would be $100 instead of $50 per radio for international.
https://www.motortrend.com/news/202...-LevkDZXQ-qY4z4puf_aem_cSy6l8DEgU6XD6fVdXEiug
Takeaways:
Maybe just add a sliding side door and be done with it?
- square headlights
- No V6 (non-turbo) option, only the possibility of the I6 Turbo in the Ram, which isn't selling well
- IFS
I got a '23 Ram 1500 about two years ago, so will have it for a while. The more I read about new vehicles, just makes me think my next vehicle is going to be used and earlier than 2020.
There ya go, that's the one I was after!
I can't decide which one I hate more though, the smart phone or social media. These days I lean towards the latter.
Hmmmm - maybe worth a thought. My current phone has PTT capability, although I've never had a need for it. But the "connect to ANY cell service" sounds interesting, need to look at it some more.
They're not completely free. There's a yearly fee of $50, though that's not that bad if you're using them.
And calling them a 'radio' is a stretch. They assume you will have cell coverage vs. a ham or GMRS that is a real radio and doesn't need a cell tower close by.
You're contradicting yourself.just like a multifunction tool, the more things it does, the worse it is at them.
...
But the smartphone itself, with the ability note take, communicate, calculate, video, take photos, etc, is a massive timesaver.
Check his website out in his signature![]()
Hmmmm - maybe worth a thought. My current phone has PTT capability, although I've never had a need for it. But the "connect to ANY cell service" sounds interesting, need to look at it some more.
I’ve been doing a lot of research on them and I’m impressed. I’ll probably end up buying a pair.
You're contradicting yourself.
PHOOOOOONNEs do many things, few of them well.
Contradiction? Let me lay it out simple. The phone, if used correctly, is an immensely powerful, efficient and capable tool. It can just as easily be used wrongly.
What you're doing is ignorance to it's capability. I fully understand how detrimental they can be if used wrongly, but the same could be said for guns, vehicles, ai, etc. Very powerful when used correctly, but can just as easily be used wrongly.
Chris , how many cell towers can you connect to in your part of the high plains ?
AND...
You're missing the point completely.
You were saying that in reference to the 2020 Jeep, and I quote "Just like a multifunction tool, the more things it does, the worse it is at them." The exact same thing applies to a PHOOOOOONNE. It can do many things, but few of them well. The detriment of the things is a completely different - but valid - discussion.
Ok fair point, I did say that. Lets look at it realistically. There will always be some trade offs.
Calls - No sacrifice
Text - No sacrifice
Email - Smaller display, takes longer to type than a keyboard. Benefit of viewing wherever, whenever.
Camera - Not as good as a dedicated, but enough for the average person. Phone or no phone, professionals typically have an actual camera.
Calculator - Just as good as a handheld
Web browsing - Smaller display, but convenience of it being accessible nearly anywhere at any time
Clock - Just as good, if not better.
Add in the fact it's like an unlimited yellow pages book and a many libraries at your fingertips, it is actually one of the few tools that can do many things well, while being more efficient and occupying less space. I could go on and on about the full capabilities of these things, but my point is that utilized properly, they allow us to do many things that we're not possible before. Those that are smart have used the saved time elsewhere and don't use social media
I'm not saying it's necessary or everyone should have one. Unfortunately, as these things become smarter, people become dumber because they take them for granted. With all the added conveniences of todays life, people become less competent.