You Bronco lovers need to be reminded of the "Bronco II". Swing.....and a miss! Hell, even the YJ faired better!
And how many do you still see on the road? There's a reason for that. As for the Explorer...c'mon. That's not even apples and oranges. More like apples and cotton candy.Miss? They sold more in 7 years than YJ did in 10, then stretched the wheelbase a few inches and added a four door model to create one of the most popular SUVs of the modern era.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/new...explorer-and-small-but-plush-suvs/ar-BB16MlXj
And how many do you still see on the road? There's a reason for that. As for the Explorer...c'mon. That's not even apples and oranges. More like apples and cotton candy.
As I recall, they (the Bronco II) had some stability issues, as well as running that damn 2.8 V-6, which was notorious for having valve train issues. I mean, they were never a serious off road vehicle. They were what they were, whatever that was. Now don't get me wrong, it's not like I hate on them. I saw one that had been turned into a "panel truck", of sorts, and I liked it. I would also love to turn one into a 2wd (Ranger front suspension?), slam it into the weeds, and drop a 302 into it. Fun stuff. But I never thought of them as a comparable vehicle to even the YJ, and that was long before I had any appreciation for Jeeps. As for the Explorer...eh. Not worth our time discussing, Chief.I'm not comparing the explorer to anything. I wasn't even the one that first tried to compare the Bronco II to the YJ.
The only measure by which the Bronco 2 can be interpreted as a failure is "is it a wrangler". Of course it's not. It was a different vehicle for a different purpose and a different market. But it sold plenty and was an instrumental step in creating the mainstream SUV.
All that said though, the TTB front axle was as close as IFS gets to matching a solid axle in capability, so if you were looking for something that was close in capability to a YJ but more comfortable to commute in, a Bronco 2 wouldn't have been a bad choice. Their biggest flaw in my opinion was being underpowered. I had thoughts of swapping in a 4.0 from a later Explorer/Ranger but it was easier to sell it and buy an LJ.
As I recall, they (the Bronco II) had some stability issues, as well as running that damn 2.8 V-6, which was notorious for having valve train issues. I mean, they were never a serious off road vehicle.
They were what they were, whatever that was.
Now don't get me wrong, it's not like I hate on them. I saw one that had been turned into a "panel truck", of sorts, and I liked it. I would also love to turn one into a 2wd (Ranger front suspension?), slam it into the weeds, and drop a 302 into it. Fun stuff.
But I never thought of them as a comparable vehicle to even the YJ, and that was long before I had any appreciation for Jeeps.
As for the Explorer...eh. Not worth our time discussing, Chief.
The only measure by which the Bronco 2 can be interpreted as a failure is ...
Addressing me as Chief comes across as condescending and dismissive; is that your intent?
In the end, I feel like I've been drawn into a position like I'm some champion of the Bronco 2,and I'm not.
Addressing me as Chief comes across as condescending and dismissive; is that your intent?
You Bronco lovers need to be reminded of the "Bronco II". Swing.....and a miss! Hell, even the YJ faired better!
I saw that slide out and it got me thinking about making one for my TJ.
If Ford focused on cars that could tackle the Rubicon trail they would already be bankrupt by now.
I disagree.
Cars cannot tackle the trails, reason why they did not focused on that path (like the new Renegade car).
I'm going to have to agree with 4_Low... I'm no Bronco fan boy. I've owned one second generation Bronco with the 302, but I've owned 2 TJ's, one YJ, and about 5 XJ's. However anyone who thinks the Bronco II was a failure for Ford just doesn't understand the point of building and selling cars. It's to create sales and make a profit. Automakers don't build cars to become icons 30 years after they build them. They build them to sell them now and make money. Ford sold a lot of Bronco II's and it set the stage for the Explorer and made the company even more money. If Ford focused on cars that could tackle the Rubicon trail they would already be bankrupt by now.
I disagree.
Cars cannot tackle the trails, reason why they did not focused on that path (like the new Renegade car).
For the record, Jeep Chrysler went bankrupt even without the Ford Bronco competition.
*Daimler Chrysler
*FCA
*FIAT
*Stellantis
What's next Huey-Xing Ho?
For the record, Jeep Chrysler went bankrupt even without the Ford Bronco competition.
*Daimler Chrysler
*FCA
*FIAT
*Stellantis
What's next Huey-Xing Ho?
I agree, don't be fooled, American Jeep stopped in 2006!I'm curious about when the public stops pretending Jeep is any more American than a US-assembled BMW or Toyota. It's been European-owned for 20 of the past 22 years.