Well, tears are salty so there is that.I would, but then my frame would rust more.
This might be part of the reason some people have difficulty tuning bumper mounted antennas, brake lines are probably not an ideal RF ground path. It also might be why my fuel pump is so noisy with respect to RF, the skid isn't really well grounded.
I don't understand the context here? Mine seems pretty well grounded at the engine block.The exhaust pipe is also isolated all the way back.
I don't understand the context here? Mine seems pretty well grounded at the engine block.
Edit: guess you probably mean isolated from the frame...
I don’t know much about radio but I never was able to get a cb tuned well on my jeep. I wonder if a ground strap to the frame would have helped.Meaning that although it's grounded at the engine, and engine to battery and body, for radio it sticks out like a big antenna since it's not grounded at additional points along the length.
I don’t know much about radio but I never was able to get a cb tuned well on my jeep. I wonder if a ground strap to the frame would have helped.
The bane of my existence leading runs. Mine works, rarely did anyone else's.it was most likely an issue with their install not mine..
The bane of my existence leading runs. Mine works, rarely did anyone else's.
I wholeheartedly agree on both of these points.What really gets me going is when all chatter has to be relayed across 3 different types of radios and stopping to yell at the one guy who's radioless.
If everyone would agree to make the switch to race radios or just about anything standardized I'd be so happy.
That's a good point, but even a huge wire like mine isn't necessarily a solution for that particular problem. A braid is far better for RF. Running radio power direct from the battery is good practice, but I myself am not a fan of running the negative back to it. You'll hear endless arguments on that particular subject!This might be part of the reason some people have difficulty tuning bumper mounted antennas, brake lines are probably not an ideal RF ground path. It also might be why my fuel pump is so noisy with respect to RF, the skid isn't really well grounded.
Well I was hoping you would have said 2002 as that would have coincided with moving the charcoal cannister.I have a 97, you have a 98 and I'll check my 99 later today but I don't recall seeing it on the 99 and I've worked in the area of the mounts on it a fair bit. The way it is tucked in next to the mount on the 97, I'm not sure I would have always noticed it though.
I bet the one piece body on a TJ is the ONLY difference between a rusted out TJ and rusted out TacoFlawed attempts at minimizing corrosion don’t necessarily mean they tried to ignore it altogether.
Perhaps it was part of the original design, but at some point the brake line design was changed and the change was overlooked in review. It is very strange that only the brake lines would be a ground path between body and frame.
There are quite a few other things on the TJ that are designed to minimize corrosion. The fact that the frame is painted inside and out, the galvanization on the body, the lack of stainless fasteners and aluminum components, etc. Those are all done with corrosion in mind.
When it is done really badly, it goes south very fast. Take a look at all the Toyota frames from a decade or two ago. Many of them rusted through far faster than almost any TJ, and the frame would literally give up and “taco the Taco”.
Granted, the design for corrosion on TJs is far from ideal, but to claim it simply doesn’t exist I think is incorrect.
View attachment 293127
View attachment 293128
View attachment 293129
I looked at my 06 lJ today and it appears there is no actual frame ground on the vehicle. The engine block is grounded and the under hood loom is grounded there and the second ground goes up to the firewall. All the lighting is grounded to the body. The small braided straps to the hood and fuel filler neck are used for static discharge and radio interference. All other grounds are attached to the body from what I see. Some have suggested, brake lines steering shafts ect. In my 30 years of Automobile electrical experience I have never seen that type of thing. The steering shaft has the rubber isolator down by the box. Bearings, brake lines, and cables do not like electrical current going through them. (I’m sure you have seen this) I have seen transmission input shaft bearing failures on tow trucks due to lack of grounding on the bed mounted light bars. You have me intrigued as to why Jeep decided not to ground the frame (maybe cost and not needed). If I can find a factory wiring diagram I will look at it and see if it sheds any light on the subject.And I'm not referring to the early model ground strap that clips on the frame for killing static spark at the filler neck.
Or the little small gauge ground from the motor to the frame at the right side motor mount.
I'm talking about a real ground like you would use for actual electrical stuff of decent amp draw.
I have a 97, you have a 98 and I'll check my 99 later today but I don't recall seeing it on the 99 and I've worked in the area of the mounts on it a fair bit. The way it is tucked in next to the mount on the 97, I'm not sure I would have always noticed it though.
I am late to the party but curious about this sentence “The way it is tucked in next to the mount on the 97, I'm not sure I would have always noticed it though.” - can you describe what you saw on your 1997? I have the same year but don’t recall any grounding wire or strap to the frame and starting to think that might contribute to my higher than desired SWR om my bumper / tire carrier combo mounted 2m radio antenna.