I am currently working for 2 attorneys now.
I think I had five under contract at one time
I love dealing with them because they are smart thinkers.
I consult an attorney who does construction litigation.
I have a personal attorney who has also become a great friend and began our relationship as a client of mine.
I have another attorney who is handling a out of town matter-
Also working with an attorney at the State homebuilderrs licensure board to enforce stricter requirements for bad builders.
Attorneys are invaluable part of the American business landscape- There’s a lot more going on in the world than just suing people at the drop of a hat.
I also have a real estate attorney who handled things in my dad’s passing and he was awesome and basically saved or made about 160,000 for me and my sister.
Attorneys matter.
There's certainly good ones out there that go unnoticed.
The landscape is changing in many states as well. Decision makers are beginning to allow non-attorneys to own firms. Seems innocent enough until you later realize that big hedge funds are buying the firms up and will soon be employing "law techs" who will do substandard work while operating under the license of one attorney. The costs for end-users likely won't go down much, if at all, because the hedge funds are there to maximize profit...but the quality of care will go down. That's ironic considering that the push for this "access to justice" movement is being promoted as a movement to help poor people. Right...
It's similar to how urgent cares are owned by the insurance company, which are owned by hedge funds. My ex's dad (physician) said urgent cares employ less doctors and more "medical techs" who work under the employed doctors' licenses. And, of course, urgent cares refer patients to "in network" hospitals that the insurance company also own...so it's all owned by hedge funds etc.
It's better to be a specialist now days in the medical field and as a new attorney; otherwise, you may have trouble paying off your student loans because ownership charges the same but pays employees less. I chose the tax attorney route because the structure is basically logical chaos that (to me) paralleled fixing the electronics on F-14 Tomcats back in the day. We'll see how it goes, but I plan to never stop working hard because I want to be a problem solver that folks can rely on.
Lastly, I've noticed the employers don't give raises like they used to for employees who have earned them. They say something like "you deserve it and we'd like to give you a raise, but we can't afford it." Instead, ERs provide raises when the EE has leverage to leave their job for a better paying job. That's why I signed up for the CA bar mainly so I have leverage to be paid what I'm worth to a firm (hopefully in AZ or UT). I'll go to CA if it makes sense to do so, but that's not the main reason for taking the CA exam. I could go back to NYC, but I prefer being able to explore the west (there's so much access to adventure and that's what makes me happy). I'm trying to pull off a balance so we'll see what happens.