Anti 4x4

Oh I know that for sure. I don't trust any news outlet because I know that they all have an agenda.

It's like I always say, "What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions?"

The answer is MONEY.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeepers-n-Creepers
I've noticed that a person or organization gets accused of having an agenda when their agenda doesn't match your agenda. My agenda is to take care of my family and get out in the woods and do outdoor stuff. Old school type outdoor stuff. Many people are against my agenda for one reason or another. That's fine. If they get militant about it, my response is "Bite Me!". Sometimes it's ruder than that, but I try to be nice. I don't need to defend my agenda to anyone, it's mine not theirs.

I used to get all wrapped around the axle about the bunny huggers attacking my lifestyle. One day, out in the back woods, I realized that I was out in the back woods and hadn't seen a bunny hugger in years. Then it hit me. These environmentalist whack's are predominantly city dwellers who rarely if ever actually get out into the woods. I sure don't run into them. They are causing me grief by remote control. One of these days I'll run into a environmentalist Ranger who may chew me out and maybe write me a citation for something. Maybe not. Until then, I'll keep doing what I'm doing and pass it along to my kids and grandkids. They start thriving at 48 hours in the back woods by themselves, the bunny hugger would shrivel up and die probably. Especially the first time the sun goes down. That's my agenda.
 
Then it hit me. These environmentalist whack's are predominantly city dwellers who rarely if ever actually get out into the woods. I sure don't run into them. They are causing me grief by remote control.

Precisely! I would say that 99% of the environmentalists (or whatever they call themselves) are city dwellers that live in urban areas. Most of them have probably never even been camping in their lives. They're hipsters and metrosexual who are doing the whole 'environmentalist' thing because it's in style.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeepers-n-Creepers
Worse yet, they are True Believers. It's almost a religion. A True Believer with motivation and an agenda is a dangerous thing.
 
Worse yet, they are True Believers. It's almost a religion. A True Believer with motivation and an agenda is a dangerous thing.

Welcome to Portland... So many idiots like that here. It just pisses me of.

We're getting ready to buy a house though and we're moving further out. We're thinking Banks or Forrest Grove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeM
Spend some time out there before you drop the cash. Nice places, but...

The sad part is that we support a lot of them through college grants and various .gov programs. Our tax dollars at work. If a lot of those bunny huggers had to get a real job, especially in one of the resource industries, they might learn a thing or three.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
Nice places, but...

But?

... I'm totally open to suggestions!

The sad part is that we support a lot of them through college grants and various .gov programs. Our tax dollars at work. If a lot of those bunny huggers had to get a real job, especially in one of the resource industries, they might learn a thing or three.

Those guys all end up doing foo foo 'customer service' type jobs. Nothing that requires any real skill.
 
You might try Newberg or out McMinnville way. If you don't mind a bit of a drive. Out in far Clackamas County isn't bad either, Canby?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
You might try Newberg or out McMinnville way. If you don't mind a bit of a drive. Out in far Clackamas County isn't bad either, Canby?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Newberg, Mcminnville and Canby are also on the list as a matter of fact. We're looking in those areas as well.

Basically we're trying to move further out where we can have some land, but no far out that if we need to get into town or grocery store we have to drive 30 miles.
 
That covers a lot of ground right there! Heck, the beach is only about a hour away. If you don't mind the flatland thing, there are a lot of smaller farms for sale between PDX and Salem. Hay sells for a good profit by the bail, and you can usually lease unused land for productive use to a local farmer.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
Yes, we've been looking at Salem, Silverton, Independence... We're looking all over. We are DONE with Beaverton and the Portland area... I just can't stand it anymore!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeM
Need to come to the central Appalachian mountains. 4x4 is embraced here and is a vital source of the communities income. There are plenty of places to ride without paying but there are some some good off-road parks that supports the local communities. People from up north and south come to this area to mud, crawl, or just ride.
https://spearheadtrails.com/
http://www.harlancountytrails.com/blackmountain-trails.php
Plenty of class 1 to class 5 trails. Check out videos on YouTube and try the area out. Won’t be shamed for 4 wheeling here if you’re responsible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeM and billiebob
Are you in the fracking business Blaine?
Interesting that this got bumped back up. No, I'm not, but I once worked for a company that was after I quit being a roughneck on a drilling rig. The interesting part is I wound up helping a gent with his Jeep who lives in the part of the world where I grew up and also works in the patch. We were chatting about my lamentations above and his views were identical. Fracking is part of the production process, it is not the process of drilling for oil and gas. Not all wells are fracked and he vehemently agreed that water contamination in their drill bore was not good and was to be avoided at all costs. Water is cheap and messes up the mud mix and needs to just be kept out. How they keep it out is as I described, steel and cement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris
1) They have been getting in the faces of the mid level bureaucrat policy makers often enough and loudly enough that the rules are being made
No. The rules are changing because we refuse to admit they are correct. Fight it and lose or join the fight and be the 4 wheeler with integrity.

The urban bunny huggers are over the top. But we need to sddress the problem. The redneck retards with total ignorance of the environment. Pretty sure none of them are on this forum. I have the highest respect for everyone here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StG58 and Chris
No. The rules are changing because we refuse to admit they are correct. Fight it and lose or join the fight and be the 4 wheeler with integrity.

The urban bunny huggers are over the top. But we need to address the problem. The redneck retards with total ignorance of the environment. Pretty sure none of them are on this forum. I have the highest respect for everyone here.
Please explain how more rules are going to change the behavior of your redneck retards? Classic example that we (my family and I) run into every year, multiple times. It's fire season. The woods are drier than a popcorn fart. Some idiot has built a redneck retard fire and then driven off and left it burning, piled high with a weekend's worth of garbage. So, we stop and put it out. Dead out using our best backwoods practices. We haul out as much of the wet, semiburnt garbage as we can. The woods are posted no fires & etc as far as the eye can see, at every cross roads and every backwoods entry point. We carry our obligatory axe, shovel and gallon of water. And use them. We don't drive in the creeks (spawning habitat), we don't drive in the water meadows, we don't chase or harass wildlife...

But still, the roads keep getting cut and bermed, more rules keep getting piled on and the idiots keep ignoring them. I don't know what the solution is, but more rules doesn't seem to be accomplishing anything. They are ignored, no one knows about them, and there are just not the resources to enforce them. It's extremely frustrating to say the least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElectricWizard
I don't know what the solution is

I actually know what the solution is, and I've been saying it for a long time. We need some sort of a natural disaster on a massive, massive scale. Nature needs to reset the balance and wipe out half of the world's population.

I'm not trying to advocate death, nor am I saying that I would want it to happen to me or anyone I know. However, the balanced needs to be restored, and the best person for the job is nature... she doesn't discriminate after all.

There's too many people in the world, plain and simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElectricWizard
I actually know what the solution is, and I've been saying it for a long time. We need some sort of a natural disaster on a massive, massive scale. Nature needs to reset the balance and wipe out half of the world's population.

I'm not trying to advocate death, nor am I saying that I would want it to happen to me or anyone I know. However, the balanced needs to be restored, and the best person for the job is nature... she doesn't discriminate after all.

There's too many people in the world, plain and simple.
Nah, no event will convince people outside of what they already want to believe. People will just assert a more convenient explanation to anything that happens, which puts them as right and their opposition as the cause, regardless of the truth. People will always believe what they want to hear over what is true if you let them.

Problems like this, whether it's large scale climate change or individual treatment of trails only stay controlled through open dialogue and, as @billiebob said, peer pressure. Sometimes that open dialogue can be civilized and nuanced discussion with open minds, but other times, it's just directly telling idiots and assholes that their bullshit isn't appreciated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StG58
Whoa @Chris, feeling a little, ahem, Viking today?

That's one solution, and the Air Force just came out with a new report last week on EMP weapons. N. Korea, Russia and Iran are now known to have them. 50% + projected causality rates in the major population centers. That should just about do it, right there.

I would prefer something a little less extreme.
 
Whoa @Chris, feeling a little, ahem, Viking today?

That's one solution, and the Air Force just came out with a new report last week on EMP weapons. N. Korea, Russia and Iran are now known to have them. 50% + projected causality rates in the major population centers. That should just about do it, right there.

I would prefer something a little less extreme.

Which is funny, because all you read about in the "news" is nuclear weapons. They never focus on anything like this an EMP weapons, let alone cyber warfare. That's what people should be genuinely worried about... not nuclear weapons.

We'd all prefer something a little less extreme. But it's true... the world is vastly over populated.
 
Sometimes that open dialogue can be civilized and nuanced discussion with open minds, but other times, it's just directly telling idiots and assholes that their bullshit isn't appreciated.
Now, I like that. Though having a nuanced and open discussion with an idiot asshole out back of beyond is somewhat more difficult when they are saturated with testosterone and armed. That takes some discretion and a good command of the issue and the English language. lol