I didn't want to hijack a recent thread on differentials, but a couple questions occured to me when I read it, so I thought I'd put them in a standalone thread.
I read comments on the relative weakness of a Dana 35 rear differential versus a Dana 44. What I now wonder is what is it that is the weakness in the Dana 35? I see a Super 35 kit recommended, but when I seached for that online what I found was an axle upgrade that said a new carrier would be required for the 30 spline axles. So is the weakness the fact that the Dana 35 only accomodates a 27 spline axle and it is that that is the weakness, rather than anything internal to the differential itself?
My second question relates to front versus rear. A Dana 35 in the rear is considered a potential weakness, but a Dana 30 in the front seems to be less of a concern. But the Dana 30 also has the 27 spline axle set up I believe. Why is the rear more of a concern and what merit is there to upgrading the front axle to 30 spline axles?
Novice questions I know, but if I don't ask I'll remain this uneducated.
I read comments on the relative weakness of a Dana 35 rear differential versus a Dana 44. What I now wonder is what is it that is the weakness in the Dana 35? I see a Super 35 kit recommended, but when I seached for that online what I found was an axle upgrade that said a new carrier would be required for the 30 spline axles. So is the weakness the fact that the Dana 35 only accomodates a 27 spline axle and it is that that is the weakness, rather than anything internal to the differential itself?
My second question relates to front versus rear. A Dana 35 in the rear is considered a potential weakness, but a Dana 30 in the front seems to be less of a concern. But the Dana 30 also has the 27 spline axle set up I believe. Why is the rear more of a concern and what merit is there to upgrading the front axle to 30 spline axles?
Novice questions I know, but if I don't ask I'll remain this uneducated.