Thanks for that, this is complicated stuff but I find it very interesting, it's been like peeling back the layers of an onion gradually learning about the TJ suspension system.
When designing suspension geometry for a rock crawler, is the goal always one of those three options (extend vs compress vs neutral)? What i mean by that is whether it would always be desired for a neutral reaction for example?
During a steep climb, lifted short arms result in the rear lifting until traction is lost and the whole thing collapses, then starts again. This is the hopping we see.
Long arms all put the rear frame side control arms mounts in about the same place to allow for a simpler bolt-on kit. This fixes the hopping while making the rear sink during a steep climb. The result is the front end getting light due to the weight transfer. The Jeep wants to do a backwards somersault.
The Savvy midarm does not hop and it does not sink during a steep climb. The behavior of the suspension is calm and predictable. The difference is where the control arm mounting positions are located. This is why the midarm is not a bolt-on kit.