I see you have personal ties to this subject so I don't want to pursue it to the point where we have unnecessary animosity. But I will reply to the concerns you mentioned.
First, calling something "cool-aid" or "claptrap" or any number of other derogatory terms does not make it so. Also, it seems astounding to me that some large corporate entities get labeled as "Big
____" and are automatically pegged as evil, despite the fact that many of them are that big because they must be in order to afford to do their business (without heavy government subsidies...i.e. Socialism). Oil exploration, for instance is an enormously expensive undertaking. But, far more expansive and invasive corporations such as your Google, who virtually controls the modern dissemination of information through their search engine, owns and (by and large) controls the software your phone runs on (unless your an Apple man), tracks nearly everything you do online, etc. is considered a benign "brother of Mankind".
As for "Big Oil" attempting to spread disinformation about ethanol; with the exception of E85, the petroleum industry really has little incentive to do so. They still sell their product but, instead of some other additive to increase the octane, they use Ethanol, not a big deal, except for the government mandate part of it. For E85, yeah they probably don't really like being forced to support, distribute, and maintain a product they do not, for the most part, produce. It would be a bit like forcing Tony Lama to sell moccasins made by the Paiute Nation; probably nice moccasins, but not what Tony Lama does. As a note, I have not personally seen any petroleum industry spokesman dissing ethanol. It does not mean they have not, it's just that my comments were purely from my personal experience.
The fact that a byproduct of an enterprise, like distiller's grains, can be made useful, does not necessarily make that enterprise overall beneficial. Would the whole grain corn (not just what is left over after ethanol processing) not be even more nutritious than the distiller's grains? Would other crops that take an equal amount of resources to produce be more beneficial (and require less quantity) than the distiller's grains?
To the idea that we would not [, as Humans,] be able to get much out of whole dent corn; again, would you be growing all that corn if it were not for the ethanol industry? Would you not be growing something more suited to the Human digestive system? Didn't you, before corn became fuel?
Finally, in reference to your question "if water is being sucked into your fuel system wouldn't it be throwing EVAP codes for the obvious leak?"; there is no leak. The water being absorbed into the fuel is from the air in the tank (not much of an issue in AZ perhaps, but much more so in say, Louisiana, or the Texas coast). You can, of course, minimize this effect by keeping your gas tank mostly full most of the time...a good idea, especially when the vehicle will be sitting a lot and will take more time to burn through the fuel. All that aside, the EVAP system does not detect an issue because it is not designed to detect water in your gas.
Again, I don't wish to get into a war of words on a subject in which you appear to have a vested interest and upon which I am unlikely to sway your opinions so, I'll call it done here and wish you and yours all the best until we speak again.
P.S.
Of course, you are welcome to rebut, I am just reticent to get into a proverbial "pissing contest" with someone with whom I have never even had the opportunity to enjoy a drink