Who wants to make a bet that the name of the new bridge that comes in its place will be something like, “Saint George Floyd Memorial Bridge”.
Who wants to make a bet that the name of the new bridge that comes in its place will be something like, “Saint George Floyd Memorial Bridge”.
Who wants to make a bet that the name of the new bridge that comes in its place will be something like, “Saint George Floyd Memorial Bridge”.
I did see a video purportedly showing the Baltimore bridge exploding in a huge ball of fire in support of the dynamite claims. It turned out to actually have been the Russian Kerch bridge that the Ukrainians blew up.
I absolutely HATE conspiracists who claim there's a conspiracy behind everything big that happens and those sick individuals who post fake or altered photos and videos claiming it to be something else in support of their extremism.
Absolutely but that's only electrical arcing. I'm only talking about the video that showed bridge that blew up in a huge fireball that some have claimed to be the Baltimore bridge. Which, again, was actually the Russian bridge the Ukraine drones took out.There is visible arcing where the bridge separated no doubt due to electrical lines.
Understood, those kind of people need to be sent to a remote island with no communication.Absolutely but that's only electrical arcing. I'm only talking about the video that showed bridge that blew up in a huge fireball that some have claimed to be the Baltimore bridge. Which, again, was actually the Russian bridge the Ukraine drones took out.
One possible source of the problem they're investigating now is contaminated diesel fuel the ship took on while in Baltimore. That could sure cause it depending on how low they were on diesel when the arrived in Baltimore.I don't know if this has been brought up on this thread yet but I saw on another forum that the ship never regained engine power. The diesel smoke that was seen was from a backup generator starting which didn't have any connection to propulsion.
One possible source of the problem they're investigating now is contaminated diesel fuel the ship took on while in Baltimore. That could sure cause it depending on how low they were on diesel when the arrived in Baltimore.
I don't know if this has been brought up on this thread yet but I saw on another forum that the ship never regained engine power. The diesel smoke that was seen was from a backup generator starting which didn't have any connection to propulsion.
Sure but contaminated fuel is a regular cause of problems that aren't problems until they become one. Maybe Baltimore's fuel storage tanks had recently been refilled. They're investigating that possibility so it's a real possibility to those working on possible causes for the crash.Maybe, but I think other ships would have been affected by that?
Sure but contaminated fuel is a regular cause of problems that aren't problems until they become one. Maybe Baltimore's fuel storage tanks had recently been refilled. They're investigating that possibility so it's a real possibility to those working on possible causes for the crash.
I was reading that they also have to switch fuel types at least on the generators when they enter US waters due to the EPA. Instead of heavy diesel oil they have to run marine diesel oil which is more expensive which can cause issues.
Does this mean we have a chance of blaming the EPA on this?I was reading that they also have to switch fuel types at least on the generators when they enter US waters due to the EPA. Instead of heavy diesel oil they have to run marine diesel oil which is more expensive which can cause issues.
Does this mean we have a chance of blaming the EPA on this?
I was reading that they also have to switch fuel types at least on the generators when they enter US waters due to the EPA. Instead of heavy diesel oil they have to run marine diesel oil which is more expensive which can cause issues.
The fuel switch is true I think. I took a mechanical tour of a cruise ship once (except for that, I was sooo bored on that ship). They mentioned they burn essentially unrefined crude oil away from shore but switch to diesel when within 12 miles for environmental compliance reasons as you stated. They didn't say the diesel was problematic but did mention the crude requires a lot of filtering.