Bilstein 5100 or Fox 2.0 shocks?

Installed the Fox 2.0 series yesterday and went on a long test drive. Here is my review of how they compare to the Rancho 5000x and my previous Rubicon Express shocks (which I found out were Bilsteins 5100s).

Rubicon Express (Bilstein 5100)
These shocks are very firm. They ride very smoothly on the highway but are too stiff and jarring around town under 45 mph. Good control overall and minimal body roll. Off-road, I felt like my teeth were going to fall out. Good overall finish and quality.

Rancho 5000x
These absorbed all the small bumps very well. It felt like I was driving on a squishy/mushy pillow. Rocks a little when braking, especially in reverse. Body roll increased just a tad. Not as much control on turns. They worked great on the highway and we’re stellar off-road. Washboard roads were easy. Terrible finish and looks ugly.

Fox Performance 2.0
My favorite shocks by a landslide. They are definitely on the firmer side but soft at the same time. They do a great job absorbing a lot of the little bumps while still providing a sports-like driving experience.
Riding on the highway is very smooth. Off-road they are a little stiffer than I would prefer but overall a great ride. Aluminum finish and looks great. No rust!

Conclusion
For most people, especially if you plan on going mostly off-road, I would recommend the Rancho 5000x. They are comfortable and soft.

if you prefer a more stiff but still soft controlled ride, then I would recommend the Fox 2.0. This is by far my preferred shock out of the three. I’m about 90% of the time driving in the city and like the feel of a sports car. They also do an excellent job off-road.

I see no reason to get the Bilstein 5100. They are too jarring which is why I upgraded to the Rancho 5000x. They seem like they are made for a heavy truck. They only performed well on the highway.

Obviously, all of my opinions are highly subjective. Your mileage may vary :)

7AD8223F-32C2-4FD7-B203-D5AC46539953.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Installed the Fox 2.0 series yesterday and went on a long test drive. Here is my review of how they compare to the Rancho 5000x and my previous Rubicon Express shocks (which I found out were Bilsteins 5100s).

Rubicon Express (Bilstein 5100)
These shocks are very firm. They ride very smoothly on the highway but are too stiff and jarring around town under 45 mph. Good control overall and minimal body roll. Off-road, I felt like my teeth were going to fall out. Good overall finish and quality.

Rancho 5000x
These absorbed all the small bumps very well. It felt like I was driving on a squishy/mushy pillow. Rocks a little when braking, especially in reverse. Body roll increased just a tad. Not as much control on turns. They worked great on the highway and we’re stellar off-road. Washboard roads were easy. Terrible finish and looks ugly.

Fox Performance 2.0
My favorite shocks by a landslide. They are definitely on the firmer side but soft at the same time. They do a great job absorbing a lot of the little bumps while still providing a sports-like driving experience.
Riding on the highway is very smooth. Off-road they are a little stiffer than I would prefer but overall a great ride. Aluminum finish and looks great. No rust!

Conclusion
For most people, especially if you plan on going mostly off-road, I would recommend the Rancho 5000x. They are comfortable and soft.

if you prefer a more stiff but still soft controlled ride, then I would recommend the Fox 2.0. This is by far my preferred shock out of the three. I’m about 90% of the time driving in the city and like the feel of a sports car. They also do an excellent job off-road.

I see no reason to get the Bilstein 5100. They are too jarring which is why I upgraded to the Rancho 5000x. They seem like they are made for a heavy truck. They only performed well on the highway.

Obviously, all of my opinions are highly subjective. Your mileage may vary :)

View attachment 265335
I agree with you.....
 
I recently bought Fox 2.0 from 4wheelonline. I can say that these shocks are smooth on the highway and can soak up the bumps well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rasband
Installed the Fox 2.0 series yesterday and went on a long test drive. Here is my review of how they compare to the Rancho 5000x and my previous Rubicon Express shocks (which I found out were Bilsteins 5100s).

Rubicon Express (Bilstein 5100)
These shocks are very firm. They ride very smoothly on the highway but are too stiff and jarring around town under 45 mph. Good control overall and minimal body roll. Off-road, I felt like my teeth were going to fall out. Good overall finish and quality.

Rancho 5000x
These absorbed all the small bumps very well. It felt like I was driving on a squishy/mushy pillow. Rocks a little when braking, especially in reverse. Body roll increased just a tad. Not as much control on turns. They worked great on the highway and we’re stellar off-road. Washboard roads were easy. Terrible finish and looks ugly.

Fox Performance 2.0
My favorite shocks by a landslide. They are definitely on the firmer side but soft at the same time. They do a great job absorbing a lot of the little bumps while still providing a sports-like driving experience.
Riding on the highway is very smooth. Off-road they are a little stiffer than I would prefer but overall a great ride. Aluminum finish and looks great. No rust!

Conclusion
For most people, especially if you plan on going mostly off-road, I would recommend the Rancho 5000x. They are comfortable and soft.

if you prefer a more stiff but still soft controlled ride, then I would recommend the Fox 2.0. This is by far my preferred shock out of the three. I’m about 90% of the time driving in the city and like the feel of a sports car. They also do an excellent job off-road.

I see no reason to get the Bilstein 5100. They are too jarring which is why I upgraded to the Rancho 5000x. They seem like they are made for a heavy truck. They only performed well on the highway.

Obviously, all of my opinions are highly subjective. Your mileage may vary :)
Do you have a longer term review on the Fox?
 
I have fox 2.0s on my jeep and have been happy with them. I don’t have a lot to compare them to other than the blown RC shocks that were on it when I got it.

I have bilstein 5100s on my 06 tundra and it’s a pretty firm ride even on that size of truck. I wouldn’t want them on my Jeep that weighs 2/3rds as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mudflap
I have them on my Jeep and I think that they are really good if you want a firm, but nice ride. You will get thrown around a good amount on jarring bumps but that's just the trade off with the stiffer ride (and with owning an older wrangler). With my stock suspension my body roll was pretty sloppy, but when I installed the Fox Shocks with my lift it cut out all of the slop.
 
I had the Bilstein 5100's briefly and agree with you, didn't like them at all.

I also prefer the Fox 2.0 for an affordable mono tube and ran them for a few years. I had the ones tuned by Savvy.
 
I had the Bilstein 5100's briefly and agree with you, didn't like them at all.

I also prefer the Fox 2.0 for an affordable mono tube and ran them for a few years. I had the ones tuned by Savvy.
In the process of searching for appropriate shocks near 50/50 travel. Right now I'm on the Savvy/Fox page doing the math.
Can you tell me your lift combo and details please?
I'm not having a lot of luck with my 4.5" front lift x 5.0" rear.
 
In the process of searching for appropriate shocks near 50/50 travel. Right now I'm on the Savvy/Fox page doing the math.
Can you tell me your lift combo and details please?
I'm not having a lot of luck with my 4.5" front lift x 5.0" rear.

When I was running the Savvy/Fox 2.0 I had the Savvy mid arm with 4" Currie springs and 1" body lift, 35" tires for the most part. I replaced them because I out boarded the rear and relocated the front, running Fox 2.0 res shocks now with 37's.

Pics with the Fox shocks and 35's:

35s.jpg



OEM chopped front flares:

35sOEMfront.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: notnsuv