Since you're not looking for a "numbers car" for restoration, have you thought about building a new car? That's a popular car so they make a lot of parts for it now.
https://realdealsteel.com/c-1158230-bodies-1970-81-camaro-firebird.html This would be the high side price wise, but there is no rust or repair to deal with. Then you could come down to my part of the country and buy an SB2 engine from one of the many race teams.
The pump belongs to a friend. It's for display only.That's a cool little truck. Do you actually use that pump, or is it display only?
Trainload of 6066s! I see one that's definitely a Chevy - wonder if there's any GMCs mixed in?
I've owned it since finding it in a shed in 1972. It had been there since 1931 !@TJPurist Do you have any more pics of your truck? Pre '35 (or '36) Chevies are pretty rare with wood framing and whatnot.
I've owned it since finding it in a shed in 1972. It had been there since 1931 !
View attachment 306811
View attachment 306812
View attachment 306813View attachment 306814
Didn't all the GM full-size cars of the era (about '58 through '64-ish, I believe) have the X-frame? I know my '60 Pontiacs all did. Love the pic, btw. Seeing one dancing to Chubby Checker is one thing, but a pair of 'em? That's something special!
348, or 409? My buddy has a nice little Model A Tudor with a healthy 348 in it. Love the looks of the W-motor!I love some old trucks. Here's a '35 Chevy I saw in a magazine years ago. W-engine powered too!
View attachment 306788
It's a 4 cylinder OHV 22 HP engine, with a leather cone clutch and a 3 speed gearbox. My father collected John Deere two cylinder tractors so I researched the JD logos of the period and had decals made.Awesome. What powers it and was it really a JD service truck?
And a stout 409 and probably a spooled rear end with 4.56 gears and slicks.
Didn't all the GM full-size cars of the era (about '58 through '64-ish, I believe) have the X-frame? I know my '60 Pontiacs all did. Love the pic, btw. Seeing one dancing to Chubby Checker is one thing, but a pair of 'em? That's something special!
348, or 409? My buddy has a nice little Model A Tudor with a healthy 348 in it. Love the looks of the W-motor!
I didn't realize there were any external differences between the 348 and 409. Please feel free to educate me on the subject, as I love learning about such things.Yep, all full-size GM cars '58-64 had some variation of an X-frame. Cadillac started in '57. It was the back bone of their "jet smooth ride" campaign and long and low designs. Front-to-back, they are strong. Corner-to-corner, not so much. I have a convertible '64 Impala and if I was to elevate one wheel, say park on a curb like some jeeps, I wouldn't be able to open my doors. And that's with extra bracing from Chevy.
That one appears to be a 348, or at least it has a 348 oil pan. I have better pics of it.
And a stout 409 and probably a spooled rear end with 4.56 gears and slicks.
I didn't realize there were any external differences between the 348 and 409. Please feel free to educate me on the subject, as I love learning about such things.