Current status on my '05 LJ Rubicon (let me know what other info I need to provide!):
What I believe is a 4" Rough Country lift kit was installed sometime between 2008-2013
Toyo MT 315 75/16 E rated tires w a 2016 date code
I assume the Jeep weighs in on the heavier side as I have JCR front and rear bumpers + swing out tire carrier, Warn Powerplant Winch, Tuffy rear cargo area security drawer, Noico sound deadening mat. Likely will be running the hardtop during the winter.
Primary use is as a daily driver (less than 10 miles a day on city streets) + weekend family fun vehicle. I may eventually want to do some light wheeling, but that is not a huge priority at the moment.
The above setup provides a pretty jarring/rough ride on the small bumps in town (paved over potholes, uneven manhole cover/ashphalt transitions etc) to the point where it impacts the enjoyment of taking the Jeep out.
From what I've gathered here on the forum, the general consensus is that springs primarily set the ride height, shocks make the largest difference in ride quality followed by tires (C rated riding "softer" than E rated).
So if I take a methodical approach to improving ride quality:
I'm happy with the current ride height and haven't found any evidence that doing springs and shocks at the same time is absolutely necessary. So do I leave the current springs on there (knowing that they likely came with the Rough Country kit) and change a different variable first?
Do I start with first replacing only the shocks and see how much that improves the ride? From what I've read the Rancho RS5000X shocks provide a nice ride on the street, although the guy I'm considering having do the work for me is a big fan of the Fox 2.0 shocks. My concern is that it seems as though many here on the forum feel the Fox 2.0s are a bit too firm and there are plenty of you that are Rancho fans.
If the shocks don't make enough improvement, then I'd be game to throw some new tires on. I wouldn't mind reducing some of the rolling weight anyway and think I'd be happy to go down to 33s that are a little narrower (likely 10"). This would give me the opportunity to move to a C rated tire with a softer sidewall.
What would you do - and why?
What I believe is a 4" Rough Country lift kit was installed sometime between 2008-2013
Toyo MT 315 75/16 E rated tires w a 2016 date code
I assume the Jeep weighs in on the heavier side as I have JCR front and rear bumpers + swing out tire carrier, Warn Powerplant Winch, Tuffy rear cargo area security drawer, Noico sound deadening mat. Likely will be running the hardtop during the winter.
Primary use is as a daily driver (less than 10 miles a day on city streets) + weekend family fun vehicle. I may eventually want to do some light wheeling, but that is not a huge priority at the moment.
The above setup provides a pretty jarring/rough ride on the small bumps in town (paved over potholes, uneven manhole cover/ashphalt transitions etc) to the point where it impacts the enjoyment of taking the Jeep out.
From what I've gathered here on the forum, the general consensus is that springs primarily set the ride height, shocks make the largest difference in ride quality followed by tires (C rated riding "softer" than E rated).
So if I take a methodical approach to improving ride quality:
I'm happy with the current ride height and haven't found any evidence that doing springs and shocks at the same time is absolutely necessary. So do I leave the current springs on there (knowing that they likely came with the Rough Country kit) and change a different variable first?
Do I start with first replacing only the shocks and see how much that improves the ride? From what I've read the Rancho RS5000X shocks provide a nice ride on the street, although the guy I'm considering having do the work for me is a big fan of the Fox 2.0 shocks. My concern is that it seems as though many here on the forum feel the Fox 2.0s are a bit too firm and there are plenty of you that are Rancho fans.
If the shocks don't make enough improvement, then I'd be game to throw some new tires on. I wouldn't mind reducing some of the rolling weight anyway and think I'd be happy to go down to 33s that are a little narrower (likely 10"). This would give me the opportunity to move to a C rated tire with a softer sidewall.
What would you do - and why?