odds of evolution

I dont believe in evolution to that extream. So no I didnt try. To me, This therory is right up there with the idea that a man can become a woman. Science does not prove either.
 
  • Face Palm
Reactions: Zorba
I dont believe in evolution to that extream. So no I didnt try. To me, This therory is right up there with the idea that a man can become a woman. Science does not prove either.

Why would an intelligent designer repurpose the laryngeal nerve pathway found in short necked animals in longer necked animals? Why wouldn't an intelligent designer repackage this nerve to not follow an inefficient circuitous pathway?

The assertion is that this designer is not very intelligent. And this is only one of countless examples in biology that undermine the idea of an intelligent designer.
 
  • Face Palm
Reactions: ColoJeep
MY thoughts.... again, is that something simple mixed with complex and opperates in harmony shows off a creative designer. It does not make me question the designer.
It in itself is an example of life and everthing around us.
 
MY thoughts.... again, is that something simple mixed with complex and opperates in harmony shows off a creative designer. It does not make me question the designer.
It in itself is an example of life and everthing around us.

What is the designer? And how do you identify what it is?
 
Are you asking to know or to ridicule me, because we have been over this?

What I know is that there is no way for you to know that the designer was or wasn't Brahma. I also know there is no evidence of a designer. And the theory of biological evolution is a demonstratable explanation of the life we observe.
 
Human DNA just randomly happend is your stance?

i do know your stance on the supernatural so I honestly do not think me making a reply to your brahma comment is even necessary
 
Human DNA just randomly happend is your stance?

i do know your stance on the supernatural so I honestly do not think me making a reply to your brahma comment is even necessary

Homo sapien DNA is an evolutionary result stemming from a prior non-H. sapein primate ancestery that appeared 200,000-300,000 years ago in Africa, according to current scientific understandings. We are quite recent in the 3.5 billion year timeline of life on earth. Your god didn't exist until about 3500 years ago as a Sumerian storm deity before being appropriated by the early tribal Israelites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorba
Just so I can get a better understanding of you, if I dare LOL... what is your goal, idea, meaning to and of life if we/all of this life, just happened by accident?
What is your goal to proving it is an accodent?
To me it would all be meaningless, i would have no drive to do anything positive or choosing the hard right over the easy left if you will.
 
Just so I can get a better understanding of you, if I dare LOL... what is your goal, idea, meaning to and of life if we/all of this life, just happened by accident?
What is your goal to proving it is an accodent?
To me it would all be meaningless, i would have no drive to do anything positive or choosing the hard right over the easy left if you will.

I am here and there is an entire world to explore and learn about. When my time ends, that is the end of my experience. Hopefully others will remember me for a while.
 
  • Like
Reactions: g.hayduke
Well JJ if its means anything I do enjoy chatting with you. I hope the best and hope to continue our conversations!
 
IMG_6965.webp
 
Why would an intelligent designer repurpose the laryngeal nerve pathway found in short necked animals in longer necked animals? Why wouldn't an intelligent designer repackage this nerve to not follow an inefficient circuitous pathway?

The assertion is that this designer is not very intelligent. And this is only one of countless examples in biology that undermine the idea of an intelligent designer.

There can also be purposes we are not aware of. This was the case with supposed vestigial organs. The list was once very long. Then over about 100 years we discovered they weren’t vestigial after all. Some serve purposes only at certain stages of human growth, others only when we are sick, or multiple support roles. Saying something took a long and senseless circuitous route is evidence for ignorance of human understanding of the Triune God’s design purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColoJeep
Besides, in evolutionary biology, why would an organism waste energy to build a long, circuitous route for a nerve when a shorter path is available? That doesn’t fit the mythological story of evolution.
 
There can also be purposes we are not aware of. This was the case with supposed vestigial organs. The list was once very long. Then over about 100 years we discovered they weren’t vestigial after all. Some serve purposes only at certain stages of human growth, others only when we are sick, or multiple support roles. Saying something took a long and senseless circuitous route is evidence for ignorance of human understanding of the Triune God’s design purpose.

To rephrase that, the more we learn and understand, the smaller your god of the gaps becomes.

What you are doing right now is abdicating your and our ability to learn and understand every time you fill in the unknown with the supernatural.

Thirdly, how do you know if is your triune god that is reasponsible for this design? Why is it not Brahma or any other creator deity that humanity has imagined over the ages?