I don't think it is the synthetic per se, more likely the fact it dosen't sludge as much so the additive package is able to clean out the sludge that was keeping the old seals from leaking. Having more control of molecule size could be a factor. Dino has a bunch of different sized molecules that average 10w. while syn has molecules that are 10w. (Extremely dumbed down) so the oversized dino mol can sort of seal in the seal while the syn can't.
Think "Farmer in the Dell". If he sticks his thumb in the wall he plugs the leak. But if he used his pinky then water would squirt thru, and (back to oil) allow the detergents to clean out the sludge creating a bigger leak.
Now, if the seals are in good shape, neither oil would "cause" a problem.
And in fact that is true, just that syn could magnify a seal problem while dino could mask it. Again, extremely dumbed down theory.
Why some seals hold tight for decades and decades while others seem to last less than a year is an entirely different discussion.
And why it sometimes seems to happen the opposite way is yet another thing. In my youth we were to push the new syn oils (they were a whole lot more profitable then) unless the vehicle looked like it was poorly maintained or more than 2-3 years old. Management didn't want to open themselves to liability for engine work from the oil "causing" a leaky seal.