Those won't really help us. They're designed to fill the gap between the speaker and the door panel of many cars, and I have my doubts that they are effective there either.Anyone try something like this? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B076MM4DJV/?tag=wranglerorg-20
I'm using adapters that allow a 5.25" to be installed in the dash. I believe I got mine from ebay many years ago, but they are quite common. Either just like these, or very similar. Mine is a 2000, before they started using those enclosure things. I wouldn't use them if you had them. The speaker needs to breathe, and those small enclosures just choke the speaker and it causes peaky, bad sounding frequency response. Actually my adapters are a poly material, not metal. Look for something not thin metal. So the link below may not be a good choice or it could be, I can't tell how thin they are.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B009DHE462/?tag=wranglerorg-20
The biggest opening is on the side, I used a piece of flashing material from Home Depot to mostly cover that hole which I believe is shown in one of the pics I posted, then completely covered it, and all other openings, not matter how small with sound deadener.
I'd remove the polyfill. Honestly it doesn't do anything of value in this application, and will just become a ball of dust covered polyfill. I know, I wasted my time doing it many years ago.
Jerry, I usually agree with you on mechanical subjects, but not here. Even more surprising is that you should be familiar with the subject. The size of the speaker in the dash is not really the issue. I mean, sure a 5.25" is better, and that's what I use over the weaker 4x6, but the mounting surface is 100% the problem. It's the worst design I've ever seen in an automobile. It really isn't much better than simply sticking a speaker to something metal by the magnet completely in free space.
Every open back speaker known to man that is meant to produce bass, is either in an enclosure of proper size, or an infinite baffle arrangement where the front and rear sound waves of the speakers are isolated from each other, which is basically what this mod does. Many people think the problem is simply the speaker locations, and while it certainly isn't ideal, the completely open structure of it, is a huge problem. The sealed pods they sell, solve the open mounting problem, but then create a new one with crappy, choked, unnatural frequency response
Now, I'm not just speculating that this would sound better, even though the nature of how a speaker works guarantees it will, I've actually done it. And I did the drivers side first, turned off the sub and rear speakers and simply using the balance control went from left to right. The sealed off side sounded much more full and natural, while the unmodified passenger side was tinny and shrill. I even have a video of it somewhere. The only change being sealing off the huge open gaps on the drivers side. I use a 80hz crossover point just to mention that.
One final note, this doesn't require major surgery, it doesn't takes hours and hours to do. It's quite easy, doesn't take very long, it's not a permanent alteration, and the results are dramatic, assuming you have a half way decent speaker to begin with.
I have a plan to address the low, and bad angled dash speaker mounts, and most will find it unorthodox, but it should address the position of the dash speaker mounts. My original post was to address the shitty mount itself, and it's lack of any bass.
I plan to run a 5.25" actual woofer with a high QTS (not subwoofer) in the stock "sealed" locations, and Tang Band mini speaker modules either along the A pillar, or on the dash firing upward. My Jeep isn't my DD, but I just enjoy making the audio system sound better for when I do drive it.
At 18 , I’d do a stereo mod even if a vehicle didnt have wheels...at 52 , I want to hear any unusual mechanical noises , at least I do until I hear them. Then I don’t.
I believe I put some in there, but I honestly don't think it does much. Better than using it in the dash though, as that does nothing at all but collect dust.I know this thread hasn't been posted in for a while but I plan on doing this to my TJ next week and I'm curious if you did anything regarding the soundbar. Would putting some sound deadening material inside the soundbar make any difference?
Bedhed, I am using DSP and t/a on my front dash woofers and a-pillar Tang Bands. I'm running a Kicker KEY180.4 amp bi-amping the front speakers, and it comes with a microphone to do eq and t/a. The results are pretty good. It's hard to get depth to the sound, but that's because the dash is not deep at all, so you're really close to the speakers, but it helped a great deal.
My sound bar speakers are ran off the headunit, and turned down quite a bit, so no DSP on them, or my powered sub.
I use a miniDSP 6x8 in my Magnum, which is similar to the Dayton unit. It looks like you have a pretty good setup.
When I replaced my sound bar speakers, I added some Dynamat inside the sound bar and also added polyfill. Did it make a noticeable difference? Maybe, maybe not.I know this thread hasn't been posted in for a while but I plan on doing this to my TJ next week and I'm curious if you did anything regarding the soundbar. Would putting some sound deadening material inside the soundbar make any difference?
Do you have a picture already posted with the Tang Bands installed? I'd like to see those. That's the first time hearing of that dsp. I'd like to give one of those a try. Anything that you don't like about it?Bedhed, I am using DSP and t/a on my front dash woofers and a-pillar Tang Bands. I'm running a Kicker KEY180.4 amp bi-amping the front speakers, and it comes with a microphone to do eq and t/a. The results are pretty good. It's hard to get depth to the sound, but that's because the dash is not deep at all, so you're really close to the speakers, but it helped a great deal.
My sound bar speakers are ran off the headunit, and turned down quite a bit, so no DSP on them, or my powered sub.
I use a miniDSP 6x8 in my Magnum, which is similar to the Dayton unit. It looks like you have a pretty good setup.
Yeah, they do make some really nice products. I've used one of their Helix dsp units before, but I didn't know about their new line of amplifier/dsps until last weekend. I watched a video review of one of their new Match amps. I can't recall which model. With so much in such packed into such a tiny package, it nearly seemed to good to be true.I like what you are doing, but I just have to chime in with Audiotec Fischer. They make many styles of amp/dsps and their stuff is over the top good. If you ever do an upgrade I would encourage you check out there Match line of DSP/amps.
https://www.audiotec-fischer.de/en/match/amplifiers/
Do you have a picture already posted with the Tang Bands installed? I'd like to see those. That's the first time hearing of that dsp. I'd like to give one of those a try. Anything that you don't like about it?
Yeah, they do make some really nice products. I've used one of their Helix dsp units before, but I didn't know about their new line of amplifier/dsps until last weekend. I watched a video review of one of their new Match amps. I can't recall which model. With so much in such packed into such a tiny package, it nearly seemed to good to be true.
Exactly and I’d add that the factory speaker are completely garbage...as are the vast majority of oem speakers. You do what you like to them they will always sound crap.A Wrangler is not exactly a great environment for great sound. Worrying about front/rear wave cancellation for the TJ's front speakers is like worrying about an ingrown toenail when you are having a heart attack. And it's really the front speaker's very small size in an oval configuration that causes the lack of bass, not the fact the rear is open to the front for wave cancellation. A small 4x6 oval speaker, even a 5.25" if you convert the front to that better size & shape, is not going to put out meaningful bass even with a properly ported sealed enclosure. I worked in the very high-end pro-level audio industry for a while providing audio systems for large venue environments like auditoriums & stadiums. I have constructed/built large tube and solid state amplifiers & acoustic suspension speakers so it's a subject I'm familiar with. I'm just happy if I can hear my stereo in my open Jeep on the highway. I wouldn't mind a bigger amplifier like I installed into my previous TJ but I'm sure not going to bother trying to enclose the front speakers for a barely perceptible improvement. Worry about it in my house? Sure.
Your point on the sealed pods is wrong. These are the ones you can buy at all auto stores. Those sealed pods as you call them are far from sealed. I agree with some of your points but the point about Standing waves and cancelling each other out in this application is just nonsense. Your oem speaker sound crap simply because they are crap.Jerry, I usually agree with you on mechanical subjects, but not here. Even more surprising is that you should be familiar with the subject. The size of the speaker in the dash is not really the issue. I mean, sure a 5.25" is better, and that's what I use over the weaker 4x6, but the mounting surface is 100% the problem. It's the worst design I've ever seen in an automobile. It really isn't much better than simply sticking a speaker to something metal by the magnet completely in free space.
Every open back speaker known to man that is meant to produce bass, is either in an enclosure of proper size, or an infinite baffle arrangement where the front and rear sound waves of the speakers are isolated from each other, which is basically what this mod does. Many people think the problem is simply the speaker locations, and while it certainly isn't ideal, the completely open structure of it, is a huge problem. The sealed pods they sell, solve the open mounting problem, but then create a new one with crappy, choked, unnatural frequency response
Now, I'm not just speculating that this would sound better, even though the nature of how a speaker works guarantees it will, I've actually done it. And I did the drivers side first, turned off the sub and rear speakers and simply using the balance control went from left to right. The sealed off side sounded much more full and natural, while the unmodified passenger side was tinny and shrill. I even have a video of it somewhere. The only change being sealing off the huge open gaps on the drivers side. I use a 80hz crossover point just to mention that.
One final note, this doesn't require major surgery, it doesn't takes hours and hours to do. It's quite easy, doesn't take very long, it's not a permanent alteration, and the results are dramatic, assuming you have a half way decent speaker to begin with.
And you’re talking about the same application...the speakers in the dash? Tell me what frequencies did get from that woofer lol.I realize this is an old thread, but I have first-hand experience along with technical expertise that validates what the OP is saying. I've measured the dash speakers with a calibrated microphone and REW, which is a free acoustic measurement software used by amateurs and professionals alike. The OP is 100% correct about the loss of low-frequency response. But I would add, it isn't just low-frequency cancellation. Any frequency that the speaker is playing from the woofer cone is subject to cancellation because the back wave of the speaker is the opposite of the front wave and they are not intended to blend together. It was years ago, so I don't have the measurements that I took that compared factory install vs sealing off the back wave of the speaker in a TJ, but I can tell you that it is a drastic improvement in sound quality. I've built and tuned vehicles that have won numerous sound quality competitions at the regional level and have multiple podium finishes at the world championship level so I do have specific car audio experience. Not trying to brag, but hoping that what I am sharing can be trusted enough that someone will try what the OP has posted so you can realize the drastic sound quality improvement. Just do it, you will not be disappointed.