Personally since you are in Texas, I wouldn't even consider a jeep that spent it's whole life in PA / Michigan. You are in an area where you can find a prime example of a jeep with no rust issues. I know when I was searching for my LJR I had my dad who lives in Houston, checking out multiple jeeps down there for me before I found mine in Wyoming. If you check out most the jeep for sale in PA that spent their whole life here, you would cringe. It's almost pointless to even look for one for sale up here.
Edit: I will say that if that jeep was for sale in PA, it would be a good find based on condition compared to most up here.
Thats highway robbery
Id tell the dealer to kick rocks
[URL]https://www.carfax.com/Used-2006-Jeep-Wrangler_z3372[/URL]
Go on Facebook Marketplace and search
Members have posted alot waaaaay cheaper
May have to travel, but not getting raped is a good thing
Too many issues for 19K. It needs to be pristine for those pennies. Just sayin!.
Considering we're all experiencing the country's Build Back Better plan and that I paid $17,000 for my 2006 Rubicon with 64,000 miles back in 2018 I'd say that the $19,000 for similar mileage may be pretty close to what it costs today, at least in my area.
As for the potential rust problems at the skid plate, mine looked worse than that and gave me 4 of these to worry about.
View attachment 448326
I felt alot better when I noticed that they were 50% skid plate and 50% frame as shown in the second picture, and neither the frame nor the skid plate were weak enough to dent with a hammer in those areas.
View attachment 448325
And here's all the rest of the rust I could find on the whole Jeep, It's on the bed floor below the rear seat. I guess it should be called the worst rust, considering there is some metal missing:
View attachment 448330
I'm not saying don't look for others, just that I don't think that one will be for sale very long.
The quick browsing I was doing this morning, definitely seems like lower mileage Rubicons are $18K minimum now. I would just want to make sure its from a rust free area.
This is exactly what I am finding as well and some beyond $20K!
I really would prefer a Tj just from a reliability and ease of working on perspective but may start looking at early JKs…
This is exactly what I am finding as well and some beyond $20K!
I really would prefer a Tj just from a reliability and ease of working on perspective but may start looking at early JKs…
This is exactly what I am finding as well and some beyond $20K!
I really would prefer a Tj just from a reliability and ease of working on perspective but may start looking at early JKs…
I'm pretty sure everyone on this forum would highly recommend against that
I've heard that the first few years of JKs had engine problems. I think that changed around 2013.
This is exactly what I am finding as well and some beyond $20K!
I really would prefer a Tj just from a reliability and ease of working on perspective but may start looking at early JKs…
Jeep prices in my area have recently dropped faster than Joe's approval ratings and cognitive abilities.Considering we're all experiencing the country's Build Back Better plan and that I paid $17,000 for my 2006 Rubicon with 64,000 miles back in 2018 I'd say that the $19,000 for similar mileage may be pretty close to what it costs today, at least in my area.
2012 is when they went to the 3.6L. They changed the interior around 2011-2012 too (I've seen both years with both interiors). I have a 2012 JKU which I would sell you (no kidding, it's on marketplace now). It drives much less like a Jeep than the TJ, but no matter what breaks on the TJ I know I can fix it. The JK has a lot more crap to go wrong and is notoriously hard to troubleshoot. They are more comfy & have more space, that much is true.