I've got an '03 with the OEM jack. Now before some go off the handle and tell me to get rid of it and buy a hydraulic bottle jack from WallyWorld, Harbor, or Northern - hydraulic bottle jacks have 3 issues that the OEM bottle jacks don't have - 1) You don't have to crawl under the Jeep to operate the OEM bottle jack, 2) the OEM bottle jack has a higher extension, and 3) a hydraulic jack doesn't have a saddle on the top to insure it doesn't slip off the lift point.
And I just remembered the 4th and probably most important one - the OEM jack will not have a tendency to bleed down (hydraulic oil seeping past the internal seals). The way the screw works on the OEM jack, it is virtually impossible for it to "slip" down without someone turning it.
My problem is this - when I insert the jack extension rod into the square hole in the tire iron, it's a super sloppy fit. So much so that it's darn near impossibly to rotate the rod (and thus the jack) without angling the tire iron to an awkward angle that makes it darn near impossible to rotate the rod. It's almost as if the flat end of the extension bar was not flattened enough to insure it would bind in the square hold properly.
I think the designer/Engineer's were smoking something when they designed this anyway - they could have used a rectangular slotted punch as opposed to a square punch and had a better interface to the tire iron.
Thoughts anyone? It's almost like I'm missing a piece on the end of the rod that interfaces to the tire iron.
And I just remembered the 4th and probably most important one - the OEM jack will not have a tendency to bleed down (hydraulic oil seeping past the internal seals). The way the screw works on the OEM jack, it is virtually impossible for it to "slip" down without someone turning it.
My problem is this - when I insert the jack extension rod into the square hole in the tire iron, it's a super sloppy fit. So much so that it's darn near impossibly to rotate the rod (and thus the jack) without angling the tire iron to an awkward angle that makes it darn near impossible to rotate the rod. It's almost as if the flat end of the extension bar was not flattened enough to insure it would bind in the square hold properly.
I think the designer/Engineer's were smoking something when they designed this anyway - they could have used a rectangular slotted punch as opposed to a square punch and had a better interface to the tire iron.
Thoughts anyone? It's almost like I'm missing a piece on the end of the rod that interfaces to the tire iron.
Last edited: