Well, from my viewpoint, we in this thread (not just you and I) were having a discussion, not an argument. I can tell that you were offended by our exchange after all, and. again, I apologize (despite MikeE024's objections.)I guess some folks just want to argue.![]()
Bingo. I've spent 40 years solving technical problems, and glossing over things that seem obvious to others was a common mistake I made over those years. I've learned from those mistakes. I like to fundamentally understand how things work, and that requires frequent splitting of hairs. I participate here as a two-way street. Sometimes I'm gaining knowledge, and sometimes I'm sharing knowledge. In this case, I was simply pointing out that the clamps under discussion solve two problems that other clamps don't.Sab seems like a guy who enjoys discussing engineering principles and how things work. I wouldn't put any more into it.
Yes, that's obvious now. Dan clearly understands the dual benefits of these clamps. However, I'm not sure other members were connecting the dots, so I was trying to do that.I may be wrong, but i feel like maybe Dan is saying the same thing you two are just in simpler terms...
Don't overthink it. You are correct, it doesn't actually maintain constant pressure with changes in diameter. It's a spring and has a spring rate (call it psi per inch of diameter change). However, it's a very low spring rate compared to a worm drive hose clamp. Also, it has a much larger working range of diameter changes (diameter changes once installed, not that it fits a wider range of diameters.)Doesn't a spring clamp match the force applied to it in order to achieve constant tension? I could use some help to better explain how a spring clamp can maintain tension on a hose that has contracted without it's pressure changing. It seems like its pressure would actually decrease to match the load on it that has decreased, and spring pressure would increase as the load/force increases from hose expansion.
A worm drive clamp quickly loses all pressure as the diameter drops - the clamp with actually slide out of position in extreme cases. Additionally, as the diameter increases, the worm drive's spring rate is very high (it's essentially a steel rubber band, after all), so in extreme cases, it can cut the hose as it expands instead of expanding with the hose like the constant tension clamp. While what we're calling constant tension clamps in this discussion don't truly apply constant pressure, they are much closer to constant than a worm drive hose clamp. That's all you can infer from the name.
As far as T-bolt clamps go, that's a discussion for another day. I think the only place we used them on Indy cars was the exhaust, but they are all over the heavy equipment used by the civil construction company I used to work for.