View attachment 499189
My phone tells me where the police are, when there's an object on the road, when there are cars parked on the side of the road, calculates the fastest route based on current traffic and closures etc.
BFD. Somehow I have managed to get by without that, and still do. I don't care where the police are, I pay attention to the road (instead of fiddling with a PHOOOOOONNE like several here will defend vehemntly) and can acutally mange to avoid objects, I couldn't POSSIBLY care less about cars on the side of the road or what they're doing. The amount of effete crap that people have been boondoggled into thinking is "necessary" is just mind boggling. Oh, and some dedicated GPSes will do traffic as well, but amazingly enough, I can get such info on the radio on the rare occasions that I care.
Allow me to quote part of an article I found on this subject:
I had noticed this as well, although on a more subconscious level until this article pointed it out to me. Our whole fucking society is ALL about the PHOOOOOONNE. This isn't right, it isn't healthy. Dare to criticize OR abstain from these things and the apologists come out of the woodwork and will defend these things to the death. The worldwide addiction and catering to these devices comes at a HUGE societal cost. VERY much like the kazillions of facebook apologists - everyone knows the problems with facebook and similar sites, yet they will defend it until the cows come home. THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES! I refuse to worship at the altar of the latter day false God "Convenience", even though a smartphone is anything but. Convenience ALWAYS comes at a cost, one that I'm not often willing to pay - and that's when the "convenience" actually is such; not a hassle like crippled smartphone is, never mind the bullshit put on modern cars."I have been surprised by the almost visceral response some people have when they discover I don't own a smartphone. Some even take it as a personal affront. It registers as a challenge to the myth of inevitability, the myth that one needs a smartphone to thrive in contemporary society." The article continues: "I can only conclude that I have scratched the skin of a technological fundamentalism that,like other fundamentalisms, wishes to monopolize a whole society, and, therefore, cannot tolerate the smallest difference of opinion."