yes, maybe
Ummm...I'll take the other side of this. There are definitely folks who are of the mindset that a truly well preserved classic car is not something that you "own", but that you are merely the current caretaker for it. While I've worded that rather clumsily, I think you get the idea. It would seem that there are a number of factors involved with this way of looking at things, however. The age of the individual, the age of the car, and what the vehicle actually is all come to mind. Perhaps a 30 yr. old with a low mileage '65 Mustang feels it should be driven, but a 60yr. old with a Duesenberg Model J Dual Cowl Phaeton feels the need to preserve it for future generations. I can't fault either one for their way of looking at it, but I tend to agree with the latter of the two. Again, there are those factors that come into play. Just my opinion, of course.
I would have to agree that unless something is like the last known surviving vehicle of its kind (like a fully operational Yugo...But what happens when the world ends and everything ceases to exist? I sure hope those vehicles have been enjoyed more than just being stared at.
I understand preserving something, but that can still be done I think while maybe taking it out for a short weekend drive, no?
), then yes, a rare weekend jaunt would be acceptable. As far as the world ending being a factor, ehhh...nothing you can do 'bout that.
It's interesting that the rectangular side marker lights have be "removed" (filled) on the rear quarters and front fenders. I wonder if the actual TV cars had the same treatment. I don't recall...
He triggers people more than posting random tweets in an election thread. The more I watch him I see his genius.
