Daily Driver, Go Where I Want To Build

What is the reasoning to work through the bend instead of just after it?
His mid arm mount is pushed right up to the bend. If he cuts it there and slides it back, then the reinforcement pieces have to be bent and go inside the frame that way. It is far better from a difficulty standpoint to do the stretch in a straight parallel section of the frame. That and he may know a guy who can help get a set of rear Savvy Mid Arm mounts.
 
What is the reasoning to work through the bend instead of just after it?
Further back and the mid arm brackets are in the way.

There is a version of this where I remove the MA brackets, start fresh, and bury the splice inside a new pair of brackets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gollywomper
His mid arm mount is pushed right up to the bend. If he cuts it there and slides it back, then the reinforcement pieces have to be bent and go inside the frame that way. It is far better from a difficulty standpoint to do the stretch in a straight parallel section of the frame. That and he may know a guy who can help get a set of rear Savvy Mid Arm mounts.

And if we do this with new brackets, I can position the brackets so I can use the slightly longer LJ arms.
 
Body stays the same length. The wheel openings will shift backwards using uncut aluminum corners.
Is it not easier to do a custom frame from the rear axle back? Obviously there is a reason for doing it the way you are, just curious.
 
Is it not easier to do a custom frame from the rear axle back? Obviously there is a reason for doing it the way you are, just curious.

I don't want to redo the rear suspension. Specifically the shock work.

Proportionally, this is what the rear will look like . But I'll do it better.
2006-jeep-tj-rubicon-best-of-everything-5034-genright-stretch-1.jpg