What did you do to your TJ today?

Bullshit vertical smartphone videos.
As someone with a passion for film making, the transition to vertical has been a cancer on all forms of media.

Someone else once compared it to “peering through an endless keyhole. Blind to all forms of context or balance. You are forced to focus narrowly on only what the endless keyhole has selected. And as this action feels intrinsically perverse, you fear to linger.”

What’s worse is that the user feels like they’re the voyeur in this relationship, when in fact they are the ones being viewed. You just end up with two stalkers silently staring at each other. There is no way to make that healthy.
 
As someone with a passion for film making, the transition to vertical has been a cancer on all forms of media.

Someone else once compared it to “peering through an endless keyhole. Blind to all forms of context or balance. You are forced to focus narrowly on only what the endless keyhole has selected. And as this action feels intrinsically perverse, you fear to linger.”

What’s worse is that the user feels like they’re the voyeur in this relationship, when in fact they are the ones being viewed. You just end up with two stalkers silently staring at each other. There is no way to make that healthy.

Agreed. It drove me nuts when it started and it still drives nuts. Gimme a fucking 4.00:1 aspect ratio! Of course, we haven't seen that since 1927, so I'm happy with 2.76:1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmMadRobot
As someone with a passion for film making, the transition to vertical has been a cancer on all forms of media.

Someone else once compared it to “peering through an endless keyhole. Blind to all forms of context or balance. You are forced to focus narrowly on only what the endless keyhole has selected. And as this action feels intrinsically perverse, you fear to linger.”

What’s worse is that the user feels like they’re the voyeur in this relationship, when in fact they are the ones being viewed. You just end up with two stalkers silently staring at each other. There is no way to make that healthy.

I think the worst part is that it's easily solved by rotating the damn phone when shooting. :D

It's one thing if going for an artistic look or shooting portraits, but when shooting scenery or even pictures and video to sell a vehicle...maybe frame the subject... 😖
 
Wow, you've been on it more then me! Kudos.

I always check things out to see what they're about - I was on instatwat one time too. I was on facesuck ages back when it was limited to a few college campuses only, chasing someone trying to impersonate me.

Never signed up for any of them.
 
I got the ‘Tism. Which means I can hold my face perfectly still regardless of emotional state.

Knowing this about the facial mapping, years back, I decided to study TikToks punishment and reward content cycles while seeing how much I could game user input to control my feed. Without the facial mapping my algorithm would degrade in comical ways. I got banned 3 times.

I always knew when a ban was coming because my user input meant I only interacted with and pursued cute pet videos. Refusing anything else.

In the 72 hours preceding a ban I would suddenly be slammed with extreme left and right wing content in alternating cycles. Then I would go to log in and my account would be erased for “bot activity”

I think the software could tell I was less a user and more of an analyst.

We put the "tism" in Patriotism! 🇺🇸
 
As someone with a passion for film making, the transition to vertical has been a cancer on all forms of media.

Someone else once compared it to “peering through an endless keyhole. Blind to all forms of context or balance. You are forced to focus narrowly on only what the endless keyhole has selected. And as this action feels intrinsically perverse, you fear to linger.”

What’s worse is that the user feels like they’re the voyeur in this relationship, when in fact they are the ones being viewed. You just end up with two stalkers silently staring at each other. There is no way to make that healthy.

I do a big hike in the Grand Canyon with a group of friends every May. Was there last year at one of the scenic lookouts when I noticed one of my buddies and his then girlfriend standing in a place that would make a great pic. I offered to take their pic and when I turned her phone sideways - you know, to capture the grandeur of them standing atop one of the 7 wonders of the world - got scolded by the galpal for not taking a verticle shot. We had a little back and forth and, clearly purturbed, she 'educated me' that shots for 'the Gram' have to be vertical. :rolleyes:
 
I do a big hike in the Grand Canyon with a group of friends every May. Was there last year at one of the scenic lookouts when I noticed one of my buddies and his then girlfriend standing in a place that would make a great pic. I offered to take their pic and when I turned her phone sideways - you know, to capture the grandeur of them standing atop one of the 7 wonders of the world - got scolded by the galpal for not taking a verticle shot. We had a little back and forth and, clearly purturbed, she 'educated me' that shots for 'the Gram' have to be vertical. :rolleyes:

I would have taken one each way so she had a good one and a instagram version.
 
I would have taken one each way so she had a good one and a instagram version.

I did; actually took a couple of each. I just thougth it interesting that a good pic of the amazing place and people she was with wasn't even a consideration, just a cutsy shot for the Gram and that she was annoyed I'd suggested the landscape.
 
I do a big hike in the Grand Canyon with a group of friends every May. Was there last year at one of the scenic lookouts when I noticed one of my buddies and his then girlfriend standing in a place that would make a great pic. I offered to take their pic and when I turned her phone sideways - you know, to capture the grandeur of them standing atop one of the 7 wonders of the world - got scolded by the galpal for not taking a verticle shot. We had a little back and forth and, clearly purturbed, she 'educated me' that shots for 'the Gram' have to be vertical. :rolleyes:

But what could a miracle of nature offer that deserves to take ANY focus away from a parasocial narcissist?
 
I do a big hike in the Grand Canyon with a group of friends every May. Was there last year at one of the scenic lookouts when I noticed one of my buddies and his then girlfriend standing in a place that would make a great pic. I offered to take their pic and when I turned her phone sideways - you know, to capture the grandeur of them standing atop one of the 7 wonders of the world - got scolded by the galpal for not taking a verticle shot. We had a little back and forth and, clearly purturbed, she 'educated me' that shots for 'the Gram' have to be vertical. :rolleyes:

I've had that discussion a time or two as well - "If I'm taking the picture, I'm doing it correctly. If you want vertical garbage, get someone else..." But I generally beg off - the last time I tried taking a picture with someone's smartphone, I ended up taking 57 instead of 1. Haven't a CLUE how that happened, but I tell people they're better off getting someone else to do it.

I was under the impression that instatwat used square pictures...
 
I did; actually took a couple of each. I just thougth it interesting that a good pic of the amazing place and people she was with wasn't even a consideration, just a cutsy shot for the Gram and that she was annoyed I'd suggested the landscape.
This is but one example of how the smartphone and its culture is destroying the world. A petty/minor example to be sure, but true nontheless. Ye Gods I miss Egypt.
 
Took mine to work today
IMG_0383.webp
 
- got scolded by the galpal for not taking a verticle shot. We had a little back and forth and, clearly purturbed, she 'educated me' that shots for 'the Gram' have to be vertical. :rolleyes:

I hope you let her know Her status is less than the algorithm tells her it is.