02 TJ ball joint and knuckle issue

I actually could use a housing at some point as I’ve got some slightly bent pass side C’s but I’m not going to Ohio to get it. I can find one around here. It’s not bad enough to cause concern yet though.

maybe grab an HO that was the original thought for me b4 i stumbled onto this JK 44 housing dirt cheap. it 's been left to the weather for better than a yr now, the pinion no longer spins easily and the surfaces are pitted........it's crap.
 
You'd think someone would be able to run a CNC version on a 3 or 4 axis mill...but I suppose there are enough used and close enough crappy ones to flood the market and discourage quality.

-Mac

Ours are run on a big CNC mill. That isn't the problem. The problem is understanding the process, what to pay attention to and how to fix the issues when they arise. If you don't know what causes the problems or that they are even problems, then you don't know how to fix them.
 
New aftermarket is iffy at best. They don't control the patterns very well and get a lot of pattern shift when they cast so they wind up fairly messed up because they don't fixture the same part to part.

Some of the Crown parts we tried to use were just terrible. They don't understand the end result they were trying to accomplish so they didn't know how to QC them with an eye on the final result.

This is one of the issues we ran into that was very common. The alignment axis of the lower ball joint hole is supposed to be on center with the axis of the upper. That is a correct taper reamer shoved in the lower hole to show where it points. Rusty is OEM, other is Crown.

In the last pic, note that the reamer shows the hole slightly offset to the right side. That brings the lower support rib into contact with the side of the lower part of the OEM inner C and limits full rotation of the knuckle on the

It is and it doesn't stop there. This is a pic taken from their ads. They have zero shame.
View attachment 336600

One of our competitors is using that knuckle to build their brake kits on.
This is it in real life.

View attachment 336601
In the below pic, the arrows show the direction one half of the mold pattern shifted. That likely means they are using the other side as the datum to locate the part in the fixture. One side shifts or rotates which throws the other side off. It is cause by worn patterns, crappy foundry practices, or lazy workers. The machinist should reject those parts since they skew the strength first and then the overall appearance of the part. When we have ours done they sometimes shift a tiny bit and that bugs me even though I know casting is fairly imprecise.
View attachment 336602

This is what we shoot for. We don't always get it this good but we never stop trying to.
View attachment 336603

View attachment 336604

View attachment 336605

That is just really sloppy engineering line control from Crown (or whoever runs the foundry for them in whatever country). These things can happen during manufacturing but they should never get out of the factory and into the hands of the end customer. There is no excuse other than "we don't give a shit".
 
maybe grab an HO that was the original thought for me b4 i stumbled onto this JK 44 housing dirt cheap. it 's been left to the weather for better than a yr now, the pinion no longer spins easily and the surfaces are pitted........it's crap.

I’d like to put a JK in the front honestly but after piecing it together with everything I’d want for it I’m knocking on the door of 4-5k… so that may be phase 2 or 3. Trying to figure out my best route. My suspension is in dire need of an overhaul/redo, and I can’t really afford to build a front axle and a suspension at the same time. If I can setup the front end that won’t require too much reconfiguring going from a TJ to JK axle that would be ideal. We’ll see how it all pans out.
 
"we don't give a shit".

i'm starting to notice a lot more we don't give a rats ass attitude, even where i work. seems like each generational changing of the guard so to speak, things are lost never to return. including manufacturing processes.
 
i'm starting to notice a lot more we don't give a rats ass attitude, even where i work. seems like each generational changing of the guard so to speak, things are lost never to return. including manufacturing processes.

Along with a sliver of dignity and will to live 🤣
 
i'm starting to notice a lot more we don't give a rats ass attitude, even where i work. seems like each generational changing of the guard so to speak, things are lost never to return. including manufacturing processes.

It falls completely in management, which generally falls into the 45+ age bracket. It’s not a generational thing it is a “we have to make them as fast as possible and let the consumer play the part of Quality control”. Things have been this way and getting worse for 30 years. Hell look at the Kragen reman starters and alternators 30 years ago. You could change 3 before you got a good one. We want to blame it on a younger generation, but it falls flat on the entire work force and management, all age groups.
 
That is just really sloppy engineering line control from Crown (or whoever runs the foundry for them in whatever country). These things can happen during manufacturing but they should never get out of the factory and into the hands of the end customer. There is no excuse other than "we don't give a shit".

We get it sometimes. Our first and second batches were good, then the third one started showing some shift. We had to rework the patterns and reject an entire batch of knuckles to get it resolved. In our case due to the beefed up casting changes I made, it was not a strength issue but one of aesthetics and "that isn't what I paid for".
This is what I rejected.

1655056209068.png
 
i'm starting to notice a lot more we don't give a rats ass attitude, even where i work. seems like each generational changing of the guard so to speak, things are lost never to return. including manufacturing processes.

It comes down to taking pride in your work, and caring about the quality of your work output and realizing where your work fits in the larger picture and how it affects others directly or indirectly.

It has been my experience that unhappy people mostly don't tend to do good work, and it's a VERY rare person that can deliver the same quality irrespective of how they feel towards a job. I feel that people were overall happier in older days since life was simpler. But my theories aside, it is kind of eye opening when you realize how high quality OEM stuff tends to be and how little there is the aftermarket that is actually quantifiably/measurably better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRE3TOP
It comes down to taking pride in your work, and caring about the quality of your work output and realizing where your work fits in the larger picture and how it affects others directly or indirectly.
I don't disagree but if you look at the reject picture, all of the pertinent dimensions are dead on, the knuckle axis is perfectly aligned as it should be, only a few of the holes are aesthetically affected by the pattern shift. In case it isn't clear, there are two halves to a pattern that makes the cavity in the sand casting mold. Each half makes an impression in the sand with alignment dogs and then the two halves are put together to pour molten iron into. If the alignment dogs are slightly off, one side shifts out of alignment with the other side. You wind up with a mostly functional casting in our case but the aesthetics are less than desirable. We still hit all the dimensional numbers dead on, they just didn't look good. The other ones above are not the same in that they are functionally compromised.
It has been my experience that unhappy people mostly don't tend to do good work, and it's a VERY rare person that can deliver the same quality irrespective of how they feel towards a job. I feel that people were overall happier in older days since life was simpler. But my theories aside, it is kind of eye opening when you realize how high quality OEM stuff tends to be and how little there is the aftermarket that is actually quantifiably/measurably better.
I don't work with large groups of folks, all I know is even on my days where I'm not in the best shape for whatever reason, the customer still deserves the very best I can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorba
We get it sometimes. Our first and second batches were good, then the third one started showing some shift. We had to rework the patterns and reject an entire batch of knuckles to get it resolved. In our case due to the beefed up casting changes I made, it was not a strength issue but one of aesthetics and "that isn't what I paid for".
This is what I rejected.

View attachment 336611

I bet you got said you have "ridiculously high standards".

In semiconductor manufacturing .. we have what are called "Via"s that connect two metal lines that carry signal or power. Typically this is part of what we call the back end part of the flow (front end being the transistors themselves). We use extreme (as in wavelength) UV photolithography to make the patterns as to where the openings should be on the metal lines that need to connected to other metal lines above and below. Sometimes, the mask patterns that get generated towards making these openings have a small shift (in the order of few nanometers) and it can cause unintentional shorts and opens. It is called "mis-registration" in the lingo and whenever that happens, we have to generate the entire mask layer (which can be very expensive, since changing one layer may cause other layers to change, and hence new patterns generated for those layers as well). Note that just 1 via mis-registation can kill an entire chip that is functional otherwise.

1655057024758.png


Very many times, due to cost or the involved timeline, management wants us to figure out what the risk is (measured in terms of projected part returns per million for running the production line with the issue) before approving generating a new mask layer. We have to always fight the fight to push for the new mask layers since the amount of work it takes when we get a customer field return and debugging what caused it is a severe loss of time - but probably cheaper compared to the loss in terms of returned parts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mrblaine
It comes down to taking pride in your work, and caring about the quality of your work output and realizing where your work fits in the larger picture and how it affects others directly or indirectly.

It has been my experience that unhappy people mostly don't tend to do good work, and it's a VERY rare person that can deliver the same quality irrespective of how they feel towards a job. I feel that people were overall happier in older days since life was simpler. But my theories aside, it is kind of eye opening when you realize how high quality OEM stuff tends to be and how little there is the aftermarket that is actually quantifiably/measurably better.

Life wasn’t only simpler, it was affordable and manageable for the average person to carve out an enjoyable life for themselves on a weekly wage. Rent, housing and general cost of living are exponentially higher than even just 20 years ago much less 30-40 while wages haven’t even come close to staying in line. Then you combine that with the average citizen getting nickel and dimed to death by insurance, the gas pump and every which way. The fact of the matter is life is rather bleak for most Americans when the middle class has all but been eroded in front of our eyes. There was a lot more dignity in the average Americans job/career, life and general sense of “worth to society” if you ask me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't disagree but if you look at the reject picture, all of the pertinent dimensions are dead on, the knuckle axis is perfectly aligned as it should be, only a few of the holes are aesthetically affected by the pattern shift. In case it isn't clear, there are two halves to a pattern that makes the cavity in the sand casting mold. Each half makes an impression in the sand with alignment dogs and then the two halves are put together to pour molten iron into. If the alignment dogs are slightly off, one side shifts out of alignment with the other side. You wind up with a mostly functional casting in our case but the aesthetics are less than desirable. We still hit all the dimensional numbers dead on, they just didn't look good. The other ones above are not the same in that they are functionally compromised.

I don't work with large groups of folks, all I know is even on my days where I'm not in the best shape for whatever reason, the customer still deserves the very best I can do.

Your eye for quality, both functional and aesthetic, is exemplary. Your expectations for your own work are higher than what anyone else ever looks for .. and it shows so clearly in every weld bead you put on, and every bolt you tighten. Even without you having to say that last bit you said .. I know you are in that rare category I mentioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRE3TOP
I bet you got said you have "ridiculously high standards".
Not at all. That is one of the main reasons I like working with my casting engineer. He has the same standards I do. He isn't local so he only knows the problems I bring to his attention and he has never disagreed with a single item. The only very slight resistance I've ever received has been a small bit of push back when I tried to get the surface finish of the castings up a bit higher. I know now that it adds a huge expense to move to slurry molds or essentially the lost wax method which I do not really need, like to have, sure, but not at triple the price. Given a choice, I'd like to see a knuckle done as a high strength heat treated forging but not something I'll ever be able to pull off for reasons including the best one which is that is a dumb product for stock TJ axles.
In semiconductor manufacturing .. we have what are called "Via"s that connect two metal lines that carry signal or power. Typically this is part of what we call the back end part of the flow (front end being the transistors themselves). We use extreme (as in wavelength) UV photolithography to make the patterns as to where the openings should be on the metal lines that need to connected to other metal lines above and below. Sometimes, the mask patterns that get generated towards making these openings have a small shift (in the order of few nanometers) and it can cause unintentional shorts and opens. It is called "mis-registration" in the lingo and whenever that happens, we have to generate the entire mask layer (which can be very expensive, since changing one layer may cause other layers to change, and hence new patterns generated for those layers as well). Note that just 1 via mis-registation can kill an entire chip that is functional otherwise.

View attachment 336614

Very many times, due to cost or the involved timeline, management wants us to figure out what the risk is (measured in terms of projected part returns per million for running the production line with the issue) before approving generating a new mask layer. We have to always fight the fight to push for the new mask layers since the amount of work it takes when we get a customer field return and debugging what caused it is a severe loss of time - but probably cheaper compared to the loss in terms of returned parts.

Same type of issue so you understand my challenges just on a much smaller scale, not the challenge, the shift.
 
I'm aware of those type issues. We used a lot of the Crown crap for a bit and fully half of them had to have the hole for the unit bearing sanded open so they would fit. He needs to go back to a good set of OEM knuckles since Dorman is likely using the same shit head foundries that Crown does.

What is unfortunate is that Dorman prides itself for better than OEM parts for the commercial trucking side but the automotive side not so much.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: TRE3TOP
What is unfortunate is that Dorman prides itself for better than OEM parts for the commercial trucking side but the automotive side not so much.

I only know of one acceptable Crown product and that's the OPDA. Kinda sad that someone actually did better than OEM on a product and it turns out to be Crown.