For the same reasons ugly women buy beauty creams. They dream of being beautiful but nothing that cheap is going to make any difference whatsoever.
:risas3:For the same reasons ugly women buy beauty creams. They can dream of being beautiful but nothing that cheap is going to make any difference whatsoever.
Hey Jerry, I'm a fan of the stock box myself as it flows fine, my goal is colder outside air.
What I had thought about doing was adding a tube to the trumpet and running the tube to a spot (don't know where yet) to pull air into the trumpet from a protected outside the engine compartment air source to lower the air temperature to the motor.
I would include a bend so that any splashed H2O would run back out and the tube entrance would be about the same height as the stock trumpet, it would only be moved forward about 6 to 10 inches at most I figure.
Thoughts?
My thoughts are is that while colder air can make a difference in some (!) situations and it definitely makes sense in theory, all that would be a complete waste of time & effort where the TJ is concerned. Where a Jeep is concerned, cold air won't make a noticeable or significant difference even if it was really cold. Unless you're racing it at the dragstrips where a .1 second difference at the end of the quarter-mile is important to you.Hey Jerry, I'm a fan of the stock box myself as it flows fine, my goal is colder outside air.
What I had thought about doing was adding a tube to the trumpet and running the tube to a spot (don't know where yet) to pull air into the trumpet from a protected outside the engine compartment air source to lower the air temperature to the motor.
I would include a bend so that any splashed H2O would run back out and the tube entrance would be about the same height as the stock trumpet, it would only be moved forward about 6 to 10 inches at most I figure.
Thoughts?
Hey Jerry, I'm a fan of the stock box myself as it flows fine, my goal is colder outside air.
What I had thought about doing was adding a tube to the trumpet and running the tube to a spot (don't know where yet) to pull air into the trumpet from a protected outside the engine compartment air source to lower the air temperature to the motor.
I would include a bend so that any splashed H2O would run back out and the tube entrance would be about the same height as the stock trumpet, it would only be moved forward about 6 to 10 inches at most I figure.
Thoughts?
If you want to characterize someone explaining why it doesn't help/why it's more of a waste of time & $$$ than it's worth where a JEEP is concerned as "defensive and pissy" then I don't know what to say.Jerry gets really defensive and pissy when it comes to the stock air intake
Could you measure your banks system for me? I will be doing a cowl mod one of these days when I get time off and wanted to see if there is a box that can fit in the cowl area to muffle the air intake noiseHey,
I have what you might call, "one of those good problems". I have both an Airaid intake and a Banks intake (currently installed now). The Airaid intake I snagged off of my old Jeep that was totalled. My current Jeep came with Banks already installed.
I was wondering if anyone knows of any pros and cons to the two different intakes. The banks one seems a bit more sealed in, which I assume helps protect it a little bit better from water, but I assume that hinders its ability to suck in air, and living in SoCal I'm not too concerned about sucking in water. Any input will be greatly appreciated.
And it's absolutely true that SOME engines benefit greatly by replacing the factory intake with a less restrictive design, since some intake systems are either designed to be restrictive (true) or just aren't good designs. The Mustang 5.0 and Camaro Z-28 being two examples of engines that will pick up significant performance gains with nothing more than an intake air system replacement. The TJ's air intake system, on the other hand, was well designed and it is absolutely non-restrictive. James Repp, sr. Jeep engineer who was also the creative force for the Rubicon, confirmed to me in a phone conversation years ago (yes, that is true) their goal for the TJ's air intake was for it to be non-restrictive.
Hey Jerry, I'm a fan of the stock box myself as it flows fine, my goal is colder outside air.
What I had thought about doing was adding a tube to the trumpet and running the tube to a spot (don't know where yet) to pull air into the trumpet from a protected outside the engine compartment air source to lower the air temperature to the motor.
I would include a bend so that any splashed H2O would run back out and the tube entrance would be about the same height as the stock trumpet, it would only be moved forward about 6 to 10 inches at most I figure.
Thoughts?
What is “colder” outside air going to do? Absolutely nothing, I guarantee it.
Please don’t take this as me being an asshole, it’s truly not my intention. I am just trying to smash this myth that air intakes, cold air induction, or whatever nonsense people want to call it will NOT make any difference whatsoever on your TJ, period.
This is basically the same as trying to use a band-aid to cure cancer.
Now if you had a Hellcat engine, then maybe you’d be onto something.
Well Chris, "colder" outside air is typically MUCH cooler than the hot air that is generated under your hood from an engine that is designed to run at over 200 degrees.
The design of the stock air intake on the Jeep Wrangler TJ has it sucking in hot, underhood air.
Cooler air is denser than hotter air.
Cooler, denser air has more oxygen and generates more power than hot underhood air. That is what it does. And cold air intakes typically draw in outside air from the front of the vehicle, which also creates a bit of a "ram air" effect.
The Jeep Wrangler YJ used a cold air intake on their 4.2L carbureted engine and their 4.0L fuel-injected engine.
The Jeep Cherokee and Jeep Grand Cherokee used a cold air intake on their 4.0L engines.
So it's not such a dumb question to ask why our TJ doesn't have a cold air intake on its 4.0L engine.
If a cold air intake does "absolutely nothing," then that means the Jeep engineers and accountants are idiots for using a cold air intake on their 4.0L engines in their Cherokee and Grand Cherokee lines. In fact, ALL of the car engineers and accountants from the last 50 years are idiots:
The Ford Pinto used a cold air intake on their 2.3L engine.
The Ford LTD Country Squire station wagon used a cold air intake on all of their engines.
The Chevrolet C10 pickup used a cold air intake on all of their engines, and that includes their 4wd models.
The Smart Fortwo uses a cold air intake on their 1.0 engine.
The Dodge Challenger Hellcat uses a cold air intake on their 6.2L Hemi engine.
So again, it's not such a dumb question to ask why our TJ doesn't have a cold air intake on its 4.0L engine.
Thanks to this forum, I have learned that the Jeep TJ is different in that is uses a unique trumpet on the end of the air intake that creates a venturi effect on the incoming air. Unless you talked to James Repp (or Jerry Bransford), you probably wouldn't know that.
I didn't call him, he contacted me to talk about a problem I had posted in forum or two about misfires occurring with new 97-98 4.0 engines, my '97 Sport was misfiring like crazy. Jeep engineering was working on the issue and after we chatted, they sent me a big box of things to try. New PCM, new injector wiring harness, injectors, spark plugs, clockspring, and a half-dozen other parts. We talked several times about my progress over a few weeks, none of those parts helped.After all, YOU wondered enough about it to ask James Repp. Right?
Fab up an intake that takes "cold air" from outside the engine. Before installing it, do a dyno, then do a dyno after installing the "cold air intake".
Let me know what results you come back with
You may think I'm being an asshole, but I promise you, I'm not trying to be. I'm simply trying to squash the idea that ANY sort of aftermarket intake will provide any meaningful gain on the 4.0.
And BWTM- in California (thank you for your condolences) a vehicle with a CAI will not pass the bi-annual smog check.Yep, not surprised. In the Cold Air Intake FAQ thread, there's links to numerous dyno graphs where a guy did a dyno of his TJ with a CAI and with the stock intake. He did about 10 runs and was able to prove that there was no real horsepower gained from the CAI at all. Which just further proves what a waste of money it is.
Not to mention that the stock air box and a good air filter are so much better at keeping contaminants out of your engine.
Only if you live in a county that requires a bi-annual smog check.And BWTM- in California (thank you for your condolences) a vehicle with a CAI will not pass the bi-annual smog check.