Do you think that question had a purpose?
I’m a vocal proponent of bringing more Socratic method into education. Didactic is non-interactive, requires very little of the student, and is very inefficient ALONE. The Socratic method invites interaction and thought and makes didactic responses more meaningful. My students love it, but I occasionally get a class that is gun shy to ask questions. I think it’s because the answers aren’t confirming their presuppositions.
that's just his gay shit.. don't pay too much attention or he'll start flirting with you with poor english comprehension and shit grammar
Is this the kit? Associated with the LiteBrite LJ build that was discussed in another thread recently?
I would not compare this with the Savvy kit, different audience and different philosophy.
(Click for large size)
Last edited:
If that is the new interesting long arm, then based on the mount positioning it will suffer from the same geometry problems every other long arm kit has.
19:17 in this video ( no Brittany!). Weld on brackets, no additional crossmember and uses a 1.5" BL to get "fully flat" skid but looks to be otherwise typical in terms of separation at the frame.
Video link (remove space after slashes) - https:// youtu.be/0Ui1vqYUs-Q
Last edited:
There is absolutely no separation on that frame side.
And notice that the upper control arms joints are in the vertical bolt orientation. There is no value or purpose in doing so. All this does is require the joints to be lower on the frame than is necessary.
Flat belly (on the jeep and the YouTube presenter) and big tires hide all the sins.
And I have to post Blaine's design for Savvy (below) just as a contrast to those folks trying to learn can see and understand better.
One of my biggest pet peeves in looking at other suspensions is flipping the bolt like that so you’re using the miss alignment in just vertical travel. Every single one doesn’t have a fitment issue to justify it either, so I really don’t understand why they do it.
