For what purpose is it the right tire size other than sorting them into piles at the tire store?For the purposes of the calculator, that is the wrong tire size.
For what purpose is it the right tire size other than sorting them into piles at the tire store?For the purposes of the calculator, that is the wrong tire size.
Doesn't matter what info he entered, the calculator still has no margin of error. It is a basic formula.Unless he put in the wrong trans info
No it isn't.Even going by hub height its still of by about 200 rpm.
For what purpose is it the right tire size other than sorting them into piles at the tire store?
That’s what I was getting at, I just didn’t word it correctly. The tire measurements are indeed the variable.That math has no margin of error. It is simple and basic as 1 x 5 = 5. There is only one variable and that is the entered tire size which most get incorrect. If you want to know the tire size, keep changing until the RPM matches the specified MPH in the correct gear and that tells you your tire size actual, not what's on the sidewall.
From stock tire size it is. Measing from the ground to the hub then foubling that is 28.5. Put that into the calculator and its 2400 rpm at 60No it isn't.
On mine using Blaine's method, a brand new 35" MTR works out to 33.875" in order to get the correct calculation. Measuring the hub height is very very close to that because I can't measure that precisely on pavement.Yea figures. Its a 31” tire but only about 30” actually
Could almost sue for false advertising lolOn mine, a brand new 35" MTR works out to 33.875" in order to get the correct calculation.
Even my brand new 31s never even out in a car are only about 30”Could almost sue for false advertising lol
If you have the other info correct, speed, RPM, trans, and gear ratio, the only variable is tire size. Change the tire size until what the calculator says matches what the dash says and that is your actual tire size.From stock tire size it is. Measing from the ground to the hub then foubling that is 28.5. Put that into the calculator and its 2400 rpm at 60
Why are you silly enough to believe that a tire doesn't squash when you put weight on it?Could almost sue for false advertising lol
I don't care because the MTR is a really good tire and no tire is a circle once weight is on it.Could almost sue for false advertising lol
Huh. I measured the sides. That dont have weight. With the vehicle off the ground. Then measured hub height. With the vehicle on the ground. Do you just come to strt arguments because you’ve contributed nothing to this.Why are you silly enough to believe that a tire doesn't squash when you put weight on it?
No, the arguments start when folks don't want to believe they are wrong. Can you math, at all? All the calculator does is multiply gear ratio by trans ratio, by tire size to give you engine RPM and MPH. The ONLY fucking variable is tire size.Huh. I measured the sides. That dont have weight. With the vehicle off the ground. Then measured hub height. With the vehicle on the ground. Do you just come to strt arguments because you’ve contributed nothing to this.
Use a trammel point, it can be accurate to .010”On mine using Blaine's method, a brand new 35" MTR works out to 33.875" in order to get the correct calculation. Measuring the hub height is very very close to that because I can't measure that precisely on pavement.
I don't need to measure. I just keep changing the tire size in the calculator until it matches what I see on the dash after I verify that the speedo is correct. That gives me the exact tire size that matters.Use a trammel point, it can be accurate to .010”
Blaine's method is more accurateUse a trammel point, it can be accurate to .010”
At what dimension do you think the manufacturer test the tires ride of quality?Could almost sue for false advertising lol
IpsAt what dimension do you think the manufacturer test the tires ride of quality?