I agree with that. I also know that higher RPMs wear out parts faster for most people, not all. Most would agree that 5000 RPMs is not a good number for a 4.0?
There are also different versions of high rpm....higher rpm with less load will wear the engine less than low rpm with high load. That and the difference in wear accelerated or slowed down in relation to rpm just doesn't matter over the life of the engine. We are talking about millions and millions of rotations in either scenario and neither are dying at any time point that we can blame the rpm for with certainty.
The important part is you don't see any more dead 4.0's that had the 3 speed on them than ones that had the 5 speed on them. for this discussion, I just do not think rpm attributes to any sort of regular problem experienced by Jeep owners.
That and if you were to drive a 3 speed geared to run 2500 at 70, that thing will be a tremendous pig around town and offroad.
I guess to put what I'm saying another way, let's say you have two jeeps, both going to 250K miles. 250K miles at 70 mph is 3571 hours.
Jeep 1 is geared for 2500 rpm on the highway at 70.
2500 rpm for 60 minutes is 150,000 revs in an hour. Do that for 3571 hours and it's 535,650,000 revs. 535.6 million revolutions to 250K.
Jeep 2 is geared for 3200 rpm on the highway at 70.
3200 rpm for 60 minutes is 192,000 revs in an hour. Do that for 3571 hours and it's 685,632,000 revs. 685.6 million revolutions to 250K.
Between these two, I just don't see how Jeep 1 is really going to last longer, They both made it to 535,000,000 million revs without giving up and no signs of it happening soon. Is another 150 million going to really matter that much? Engines blowing can almost always be attributed to something other than revving too high of rpm for their lifetime.