Novak Conversions Jeep Wrangler TJ engine mounts

Nashville TJ's Build - Continued

And here we go. Hopefully for the last time, so every step:

Remove the six pinion carrier housing bolts:

IMG_9590.JPG


Use the puller to remove the pinion carrier housing:

IMG_9602.JPG


Select and verify the new pinion carrier shim stack - in this case 49 thou.

IMG_9673.JPG


Slip the carrier into position, install the six bolts to get proper alignment (critical step), and tap into place:

IMG_9691.JPG


Torque down the six carrier housing bolts:

IMG_9710.JPG


Check and set the backlash. I was able to get to 4.5 thou this time.

IMG_9724.JPG


Apply the marking compound (as Mike taught me - I use as little as possible. In fact, I only added compound to the brush the very first time I did this. All subsequent dozen times I'm just spreading it back out):

IMG_9735.JPG


Tension the carrier:

IMG_9743.JPG


16 turn rotation workout one way, and then 16 the other:

IMG_9752.JPG


And just like that - pattern:

IMG_9759.JPG


IMG_9760.JPG


Side by side the original 49-7 pattern, it's very difficult to see a difference.

Given that I knew my target shim stack going in, this entire process took about 10 minutes.

Also, as a final step before I button it up, I checked the backlash at six points on the pinion: 4.5, 5, 4.5, 5, 4, 5. So only 5 tenths variance in either direction. I think that speaks well of Crowne's machining capability.
 
Last edited:
I'm curious about the backlash on these. Why do you want that to be on the tight side so much?

If you're pinion depth is 3 thou deep, and the backlash is really tight, it doesn't give the gears a whole lot of room to mesh. In a racing application I might understand. Not so much for this. Is it a 14b thing specifically?

I'm just thinking about the noise and grinding feel you had.

I've always liked backlash on the tighter side - until now that was just personal preference for...well..., reasons :rolleyes:. Last year I came in at 5.

I spoke about this with Ben as well, and he told me that in addition to being a little deeper, stay on the tighter side of the backlash range. What he said was that all gears deflect under heavy load (hello, fat-ass Yellow Jeep), and starting tight gives you more leeway at the top under deflection.

Again, with the 14 bolt it's a wide range starting at 3. So, I'm on the tight end, but spec would let me go even tighter.

What do you think, Mike - does that make any sense?
 
Last edited:
Here is the drive side of the current setup compared to the original 49 7 that Ben recommended:

IMG_9759.JPG

IMG_9490.JPG


Interesting, looking at these things side by side in hi-res on the big screen, I can actually see the same irregularities in the patterns of a few of the teeth that are identical. It feels spot on.
 
I've always liked backlash on the tighter side - until now that was just personal preference for...well..., reasons :rolleyes:. Last year I came in a 5.

I spoke about this with Ben as well, and he told me that in addition to being a little deeper, stay on the tighter side of the backlash range. What he said was that all gears deflect under heavy load (hello, fat-ass Yellow Jeep), and starting tight gives you more leeway at the top under deflection.

Again, with the 14 bolt it's a wide range starting at 3. So, I'm on the tight end, but spec would let me go even tighter.

What do you think, Mike - does that make any sense?

It does. I just like to hear the reasoning to justify the "why".
 
I have everything buttoned back up and ready to go in - including filling it with gear oil. I generally let the RTV cure over night before I allow oil to get to it, so I'll wait until tomorrow to reinstall the axle. So, on the road tomorrow.

IMG_9766.JPG
 
I have everything buttoned back up and ready to go in - including filling it with gear oil. I generally let the RTV cure over night before I allow oil to get to it, so I'll wait until tomorrow to reinstall the axle. So, on the road tomorrow.

View attachment 670529

Tomorrow

giphy.gif
 
I've seen that many manufactures recommend mineral oil vs synthetic. I'm pretty sure gear oil didn't cause your problem, but I just wondered what lube you run?
 
I've seen that many manufactures recommend mineral oil vs synthetic. I'm pretty sure gear oil didn't cause your problem, but I just wondered what lube you run?

I run this stuff. Full dino... ;) The big 14 bolt takes about 3.5 quarts.

IMG_9047.JPG
 
All back together. Took it out for a 20 mile initial run. Quiet as a mouse.

View attachment 670639

Well, the rear diff, anyway... :)

Thanks for all the help and input, Boyz. Much appreciated.

Who's winching you out of that predicament? ;)

Glad it's quiet Jeff
 
I've noticed recently that my GMRS radio has been shutting itself off. After a little twisting, bending and pulling on the connections I discovered that the Cat 6 coupler which connects the handheld unit to the base unit under the dash was the problem. I didn't have another coupler on hand, but I did have a Cat 6 extender. Since this is the exact reason I got the 3D printer, I fired up Fusion 360 and went to work on a holder to secure the end of the extension to the console.

Here is the new coupler, and the final model printed in PLA.

IMG_9812.JPG


It's a tight press fit, with a taper at the back to match the shape of the connector. The connector is rubber coated, so once it is pressed in it does not move. I was originally going to add a set screw to keep it all together, but it absolutely does not need it.

IMG_9815.JPG


Satisfied with the fit and finish after two models, I printed the final version in black ASA. The original failed connector is on the left:

IMG_9818.JPG


Finally, installed in the Jeep, and success. Now the radio stays on until I turn it off.

IMG_9824.JPG


That was a fun little project.
 
Novak Conversions Jeep Wrangler TJ engine mounts