Dave Kishpaugh's (Jeep West) geometry correction brackets are now available

Status
Not open for further replies.
a tall lift SA is really effected by this most and gets worse with more travel. whether it's effects can be blamed or felt is unknown to me.
true, and another consideration is the TJ is shorter where it would be a tighter turn where as on an LJ it would be wider.
 
After thinking about the difference between those I feel pretty silly haha
It's easy to get caught up in small differences. Id make a big change and find the range that you like, then dial it in from there
 
A 3/4” lower hole put my AS at 100% with the calculator. I can’t decide if I should go this drastic or try 5/8” lower as more of a happy medium.
Just get a premade CA from any company out there that has three holes on it and use that separation dimension, Is there for a reason and once you pick your hole, the rest will be beaten to death on one of these threads.
 
What’s the smallest gap I can leave between holes with no strength loss in a 1/4” bracket?
 
If this was your comment many pages ago I think many could see why you may not be in favor of them. The roll center would be a plus, but the AS would be a bigger plus. Let folks decide what products to use. We have 600 plus comments before you stated that for a bit more work there is a better option. A lot more money too.
There always has to be a line and only the Jeeps owner can say where that is. After all an atlas 4speed is only a bit more work and money than a SYE. An LS swap is is only a bit more work and money than a rebuilt stock motor.
It's been there off and on and all thoughout. People just don't want to see it. And perhaps I wasn't clear. Given my experiences both with mine and watching those around me, I still think these brackets are a waste of effort even for the smaller builds. Put the effort elsewhere. For those trying to decide, take that for what is worth. That's how these things work.

And if people are going to decide on an Atlas or an LS, they should know none of that is true.
 
If you don't know the real weight of your rig, that little difference isn't going to mean anything. Weigh the rig and go back to the formula if you want to be more precise,

even knowing the weight, we're all just guessing at the CoG height. The Triage calculator even goes into unsprung weight per axle, and I've only figured out that it moves the 100% AS line, but not how yet.

EDIT - the 100% AS line runs from the ground below the rear axle centerline, to the point above the front axle centerline that intersects with the AS CG line, which is a horizontal line at height determined by this forumula:
(CG Height*VehicleMass - RearUnsprungMass*TireRollingRadius)/(VehicleMass - RearUnsprungMass)

Anybody weighed their complete Dana 44 with sway bar but without links? And then separately weighed their driveshaft, arms, track bar?

Anybody weighed their rig laying on it's side with separate scales under the tires and under the upper tube of the roll cage?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: JMT and starkey480
It's been there off and on and all thoughout. People just don't want to see it. And perhaps I wasn't clear. Given my experiences both with mine and watching those around me, I still think these brackets are a waste of effort even for the smaller builds. Put the effort elsewhere. For those trying to decide, take that for what is worth. That's how these things work.
To be fair the difference on the road is highly noticeable and valuable for daily driving.
even knowing the weight, we're all just guessing at the CoG height. The Triage calculator even goes into unsprung weight per axle, and I've only figured out that it moves the 100% AS line, but not how yet.
I gave my best guess at the unsprung axle weight by adding the axle, wheels, tires, and a little bit for cushion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pressurized and JMT
No doubt that it's there. Wait till you get some good shocks. You'll rethink what highly noticable is.
Cant argue with that^ when I was still on my stock arms with blown bushings and put on the new gas powered foxs, highly noticable is an understatement. I cant wait to outboard to feel that difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjvw
are we gonna be seeing a new BFH series in the future?
That was happening before this thread anyway. I already have towers, shocks, and caliper flip. Just need to find the right time to get it done. I'm currently testing the 5000x shocks to give some unbiased opinions on the 5100's and the 5000x's. Then on to the RR Fox's.👍
 
true, and another consideration is the TJ is shorter where it would be a tighter turn where as on an LJ it would be wider.
this is the ugly side of my stretch, i gave up that turn on a dime.
 
That was happening before this thread anyway. I already have towers, shocks, and caliper flip. Just need to find the right time to get it done. I'm currently testing the 5000x shocks to give some unbiased opinions on the 5100's and the 5000x's. Then on to the RR Fox's.👍
Then an R2.8 engine swap :D
 
  • Wow
  • USA Proud
Reactions: D M and Vasq
Ok I dug through some old long arm vs short arm threads and found some calculations @jjvw has done.
Here is a 4” lift with no geo correction. Antisquat in the 170% range
FD78F5C7-7D2A-4506-85CE-8BF8D74AD214.jpeg

Here is Josh’s midarm. Antisquat in the 80% range
780F1821-8B9D-4661-A68D-054D3A367A7E.jpeg

Here is geo correction. Antisquat at 117%
F50236A6-3714-4E7B-B657-5C7F0E643A5E.jpeg

It would make sense that the 37% difference in Antisquat observed between geo correction and savvy midarm is probably bulk of the difference in hopping we observe in the videos. Happy folks? See how nice science and numbers and communication can be? Geo correction is roughly 50% lower AS than stock brackets, and savvy midarm is roughly 90% lower than stock brackets.
 
Ok I dug through some old long arm vs short arm threads and found some calculations @jjvw has done.
Here is a 4” lift with no geo correction. Antisquat in the 170% range
View attachment 251676
Here is Josh’s midarm. Antisquat in the 80% range
View attachment 251677
Here is geo correction. Antisquat at 117%View attachment 251678
It would make sense that the 37% difference in Antisquat observed between geo correction and savvy midarm is probably bulk of the difference in hopping we observe in the videos. Happy folks? See how nice science and numbers and communication can be? Geo correction is roughly 50% lower AS than stock brackets, and savvy midarm is roughly 90% lower than stock brackets.
200.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.