Where are you finding these posts?![]()
They originate at Democrat Underground
Where are you finding these posts?![]()
Would anything at all be done?
Truth be told, I'm not a huge fan of Trump's actions in his first term. Too much spending and "warp speed" to name a couple. Hopefully, he can move to the Libertarian side with Musk in there and actually reduce government's power and cost. I'm not holding my breath on this. I do worry about Vance. He has aspirations beyond this win and he has no money to support that without the machine's.....
When even the left is wondering about the mystical 20 million votes from 2020, that may be a good sign.
So, serious question, what if it is discovered that Biden actually LOST in 2020 and the election was compromised?
Would anything at all be done?
Think they'll rethink this stupidity?
I do. If Trump/Vance holds the popular vote majority, they'll give up on it for a while.
Imagine if that was fully in effect. Trump would get the votes of most of the blue states. Minnesota was dumb enough to pass it, Walz even signed it. I'd love to see the Trump take MN's votes.
I can't believe it's constitutional.
In 2020, there were 168 million registered voters in the US:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/273743/number-of-registered-voters-in-the-united-states/
The Census bureau states there were 154 million votes cast in the 2020 election, 81 million for President Daddyshowers, what do they say, 73-74 million for President Trump, and some loose change to Green, Libertarian, Pastafarian party and other crackpots.
These numbers don't really add up correctly, that's the reason I posted the source for each.
https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/2020-presidential-election-voting-report.html
Based on those 2 numbers, 91% of eligible voters in the US cast ballots.
Or, ballots FOR them were counted......
A 91% voting rate is extremely high, unless you live in Venezuela, Irag, or some other third world banana republic where "El Presidente Maximo Por Vida" "wins" in another landslide
election.
The CFR states there were 159 million votes cast in 2020.
https://www.cfr.org/blog/2020-election-numbers
That changes the percentage of eligible to cast votes to 94%.
A 94% voter turnout is unbelievable.
Really.
In 1964, the first year these stats were tracked, the percentage of registered voters that cast ballots was around 67%.
And that number has gone down every year until 1976, a very slight increase, small increase until 1984, then another decline, until a sharp spike in 1992, small changes, etc, until it is reported there was a 62% turnout of registered voters in 2020.
https://www.statista.com/statistics...-presidential-elections-by-gender-historical/
So, 94% would be required to make the 2020 numbers work, but the numbers presented for "percentage of register voters-to-ballots cast" is 62%.
That's really a pretty big "statistical error", even by Washington bean counter standards.
Someone did a really well done article about it maybe 4 months or more back.
I thought I had save it, but can't find a link.
All he did was run the hard numbers available, "this many registered voters, this many ballots counted, here's the percentage".
No matter how you count it, something doesn't add up.
I do believe President Trump received 74 million votes cast in 2020. The other numbers given?
Yeah, not gonna buy that one without some new data numbers.
"Too big to rig" appears to be what saved us THIS time.