Anybody up for a random meme dump?

1621915734687.webp




1621915882643.webp




1621916221108.webp
 
That graphic was created by a think tank funded by you know who. It’s a culmination of research into moving independent votes to the D’s.

So R’s are wrong to believe that D’s want to grab guns when 4 presidential candidates say that exact thing in televised debates? Live birth abortions, passed in 5 states isn’t killing babies? What is it? The tax dollars for everyone’s benefit is rich... the green industry makes the industrial military complex look like child play.
pure propaganda ..... not that the R’s would be much different.
 
It's sickening to read some of the comments from the Dems that went along with this. While I do think if both sides could sit down and actually talk they would find a lot of things we ALL want. What I've always seen as the problem is the means used to get there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: reddvltj
It's sickening to read some of the comments from the Dems that went along with this. While I do think if both sides could sit down and actually talk they would find a lot of things we ALL want. What I've always seen as the problem is the means used to get there.
OTOH, they'd also find plenty of things NOBODY wants that they'll shove down our throats anyway!!
 
That graphic was created by a think tank funded by you know who. It’s a culmination of research into moving independent votes to the D’s.

So R’s are wrong to believe that D’s want to grab guns when 4 presidential candidates say that exact thing in televised debates? Live birth abortions, passed in 5 states isn’t killing babies? What is it? The tax dollars for everyone’s benefit is rich... the green industry makes the industrial military complex look like child play.
pure propaganda ..... not that the R’s would be much different.

LMAO! No think tank needed. I could easily do something like this reading in this sub forum.
 
  • Face Palm
Reactions: Wildman
LMAO! No think tank needed. I could easily do something like this reading in this sub forum.
It was created by Tides. This version was cropped to leave off the header.

I'm not sure you could put original content on here if you tired. Go Google something.... copy it verbatim and post it with no credit given... That's your game. Dishonest.... just like that list of BS. All D's are good and All R's are evil... here's the proof.

Are you trying to say that 4 of your party's candidates for President didn't say that they would "take guns"? Beto did without a doubt and Biden agreed... so did Warren and your Bro Bernie. Now that's on his sub forum.

Don't you have some degenerate generated BS by the Lincoln Project to post?
 
It was created by Tides. This version was cropped to leave off the header.

I'm not sure you could put original content on here if you tired. Go Google something.... copy it verbatim and post it with no credit given... That's your game. Dishonest.... just like that list of BS. All D's are good and All R's are evil... here's the proof.

Are you trying to say that 4 of your party's candidates for President didn't say that they would "take guns"? Beto did without a doubt and Biden agreed... so did Warren and your Bro Bernie. Now that's on his sub forum.

Blah blah blah blah. Trump said he would build a wall. What is your point?
 
Blah blah blah blah. Trump said he would build a wall. What is your point?
What is your deal with Trump? I didn't vote for him in 2016 but did in 20. That kept my string of never having voted for a winning candidate in tact for 40 years now. I'm not a party person and hold views that both claim yet never act upon. What do you actually believe?.... other than getting a school girl giggle from stupid videos?

Can you actually form on opinion and defend it on policy or anything else or is it just copy-paste and silly little Orangemanbad stuff?
 
LMAO! No think tank needed. I could easily do something like this reading in this sub forum.

Of course you could. So what are you waiting for?


I'm not a party person and hold views that both claim yet never act upon.

I understand what you're saying but I'd bet your view didn't quite line up with most of biden's so-called party views that they are actually trying to act upon by doing their best to force those twisted views on the USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: reddvltj
Of course you could. So what are you waiting for?




I understand what you're saying but I'd bet your view didn't quite line up with most of biden's so-called party views that they are actually trying to act upon by doing their best to force those twisted views on the USA.
No.... not at all. I'd consider myself a Libertarian by most accounts. I don't buy into the idea that the government needs idealogical guidance. The Marxist part of the Left can take a leap right into the same lake as the far right religious groups.

The D's view of government has failed miserably. 11 Cities account for 70% of the Racial issues we see, they also account for the majority of income disparity (and it's widening daily) and the overwhelming majority of the murders by guns and murders overall. Further the biggest gap in education outcomes are there as well in spite of nearly 1.5 times the spending on schools. These cities have been "blue" for 60+ years and are in Blue states. Blue school districts, blue counties and so on. The largest cries for justice start and are fostered in this areas of the country. Anyone supporting the D's needs to explain why the results will be different if they get more of the same. Dependency, corruption, wider gaps each year in just about every aspect of life between the haves and have nots. That's what history shows, that's what application of a top down tax and spend "social network" nets us IMHO. More of that is truly stupid.... but the networks of cronies that support it is never ending in their need for corrupt dollars.

Most of the "policy" that is enacted is done through continuing resolutions that area passed weekly by 80% to 90% approval. So the idea that these are two parties is silly when spending money on cronies. The stuff that everyone sees and discusses is stuff they will use to get elected but never intend to act on.

Take immigration for example. Both parties have created what we're seeing. Obama dodged it when he had control and so did Bush, Clinton and Bush before that. Trump tossed the D's a bone but they weren't going to move an inch if it meant he got credit but his proposals in concept were the best I've heard discussed in my life. He was to naive about how DC worked.... he actually tried to find common ground (DACA for Wall and work visas) but that's not how it works. Can't solve that issue.... it gets a 30% on voter motivation each election cycle. The D's learned their lesson big time with the Gay marriage issue. Once passed a large portion of that constituency moved Right at the Federal level and even more so at the State and Local elections level.

My idea is less of this is better.... period. If anyone truly believes the D's want racial equality or that the R's are going to balance a budget I've got a bridge for you.... That would reduce the illusion of their "need" and thus reduce their power. Not going to happen.
 
Last edited: