From a monetary policy perspective, I find this fascinating. Although I understand they can still issue debt, just not in Bitcoin.
its likley they tracked the public address(es) the coins were sent to. with most blockchain technologies the encryption keys are private but the wallet addresses are public for all to view (although there is no way to tell who the owner of the wallet is).How did the police recover the bitcoins provided by colonial pipeline? Did they steal them somehow? Do they have power over the currency?
I think other South American nations are likely to follow, if electricity is relatively cheap out there mining firms will start moving out there, china has the monopoly on mining crypto at the moment bit the will lose that with the way they constantly flip flop on crypto being legal.From a monetary policy perspective, I find this fascinating. Although I understand they can still issue debt, just not in Bitcoin.
So how do they confiscate the wallet?its likley they tracked the public address(es) the coins were sent to. with most blockchain technologies the encryption keys are private but the wallet addresses are public for all to view (although there is no way to tell who the owner of the wallet is).
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer for example
https://bscscan.com/
some protocols are built to be private and will scramble the transaction throughout the blockchain to its final wallet so you cant track it but bitcoin isn't build that way.
I don't see how they could confiscate a "private" or Hardware wallet, maybe the wallet address was on a centralised exchanged like binance or coinbase. most people use hot wallets, this is the FBI here so they have their methods of cracking stuff im assuming it was a hot wallet on a centralised exchanged they they possibly cracked the users private keys, this could be down to a security vulnerability on the exchange side or the criminals operating system, I'm just guessing here though . May have been something as simple as contacting the exchange and informing them that they are hosting a criminals wallet, a lot of exchanges ask for KYC now when you sign up or they limit the amount you can trade without a KYC etcSo how do they confiscate the wallet?
So the FBI did what any similarly resourced enterprise can do.I don't see how they could confiscate a "private" or Hardware wallet, maybe the wallet address was on a centralised exchanged like binance or coinbase. most people use hot wallets, this is the FBI here so they have their methods of cracking stuff im assuming it was a hot wallet on a centralised exchanged they they possibly cracked the users private keys, this could be down to a security vulnerability on the exchange side or the criminals operating system, I'm just guessing here though . May have been something as simple as contacting the exchange and informing them that they are hosting a criminals wallet, a lot of exchanges ask for KYC now when you sign up or they limit the amount you can trade without a KYC etc
so if l have my crypto on a ledger in my back pocket or some other completely air gapped cold wallet they can gain access to it.
It all seems sketchy to me idk, why would you use coinbase if you are pulling off something that big, like there are thousands of other wallets that are more accessible and secure.ok so apparently the "hackers" used coinbase wallets !!! why would anybody with the ability to coordinate a ransomware attack use the biggest centrlised exchange on the planet which also became a publcily traded company. The FBI probably got those "private" keys with a phone call.
It all seems sketchy to me idk, why would you use coinbase if you are pulling off something that big, like there are thousands of other wallets that are more accessible and secure.
idk man
Coinbase CSO Martin meanwhile added on Twitter: “Coinbase uses a pooled hot wallet, so handing over a specific private key wouldn’t make a ton of sense, and we’ve (for obvious security reasons) not built a private key export API endpoint into our signing systems… how did they get the private key? Maybe some whiz-bang magic, but my guess would be it was some good ol’ fashioned police work to locate the target servers, and an MLAT [mutual legal assistance treaty] request and/or some political pressure to get access.”
As Coinbase CSO Philip Martin put it: “I’ve seen a bunch of incorrect claims that Coinbase was involved in the recent DOJ seizure of bitcoin associated with the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack. We weren’t. Coinbase was not the target of the warrant and did not receive the ransom or any part of the ransom at any point. We also have no evidence that the funds went through a Coinbase account/wallet.”
that still doesnt add up, if there were trying to "wash" why would they use an american based exchange and keep it in the form of one of the oldest and most tracable coins, there are plenty of privacy coins they could have converted it to which would have made the job a lot harder.It’s likely they had the coins in a private wallet and were trying to wash them through a few exchanges before cashing it out. But there are a few companies built to analyzing the block chains and tracing coins/relationships.
It’s funny that people think the blockchain is good for illicit transactions, and it was early on, but now everything is traceable and all you need to do is pair a person to a wallet. After that, everything is known about how that wallet is used.