This is a very hotly debated issue where folks tend to be very opinionated. We have front and rear antirocks on the Ultra 4 cars I work on but we don't run them on our rock crawlers. In my opinion it really depends on the particular suspension setup and the trail, sometimes it helps, sometimes it doesn't. While I like Antirocks for many applications it should be understood they are one element in a package, maybe better in one case, maybe not in another. I am sure there have been times where it would have helped me on one obstacle and hurt me on the next, lots of variables...
The way a TJ axle is setup the arms form a parallelogram box with some torsional rigidity, for it to move up on one side and down on the other is must deflect the rubber in the link bushings or flex the axle mount so this gives it some resistance to sway even when the bar is disconnected. This became very apparent recently when I was cycling my front suspension setting up the bump stops in my front end. A three link, Y link or a four link with one telescoping arm does not have this resistance to sway. The antirock can replace the sway resistance or add more sway control on one of those, it can also add adjustability/control by changing the effective arm length. I am also curious about the dual rate sway control devices using co-axial rods and tubes where two different levels of sway control mode can be easily selected (street/crawl).
I am still relatively new to the Jeeping and crawling world with a Jeep that is an ongoing work in progress. Keeping an open mind, sifting through info provided to determine what is best is always a challenge.