Put the money aside for a second .. once you go there, it becomes me vs you, and the focus goes elsewhere. We are adults and we should be able to talk like adults instead of "What about you and me in the playground after 6? Are you man enough?" And FYI, you can add couple more (or how many ever) zeros to your $1000 and and my stance would still be the same.
Explain to me what is physically happening when you do what you wrote above and why you think the ride quality changes. Talk about damping, talk about sprung mass, talk about vehicular dynamics and explain the "why" of it with your understanding. Note that I am not a 16 year old kid with a lifted Jeep, I am well educated and I understand math and physics very well. If you prefer not to (or can not) explain, that is fine .. we will agree to disagree and move on.
Also - I am not being disingenuous in any way or form. Shocks are the ONLY thing that matter when it comes to perceived ride quality. One cannot tune ride quality with springs. Call up anyone you know that tunes coilovers and ask them if they care about the spring rates in the setup. They won't. The only function springs have is to set the correct/desired ride height for vehicle. The ride quality is all determined by the shock tune. You are welcome to vehemently disagree.
Pesky thing about physics. There are LAWS associated with the field and we don't get to apply them to a precept we believe in and ignore them in others.
The laws of physics apply across the board.
The proof is in the pudding. It is simple. It is completely provable. Sadly, I have received e-mails from several people on this forum who have had the same experience with swapping OME coils on their own jeeps and saw a very noticeable difference in ride quality. They have posted about this in the past and were torn to shreds for stating what they plainly experienced or more recently they refuse to post their own results for fear of what will happen if they do.
I find that sad indeed on a forum where people are seeking honest answers.
I have never disputed shock tuning as a means of improving ride quality. That would be a stupid position to take.
Why do you think shock tuners do what they do? Why would a shock tune change ride quality? The answer is that changing valving in a shock changes resistance and response. If you increase the compression valving in a shock, you are creating more resistance against the inertia that is compressing it, which will firm up the ride. If you decrease the compression valving, the ride will be softer. Valving on extension affects ride quality as well, but that's another thing.
The point is you are adding or removing resistance that dampens suspension movement and that resistance affects ride quality.
OF COURSE the tuners aren't concerned about spring rate!!! They are adding or removing resistance as desired by the customer to optimize ride (or handling, etc) based on whatever that application already has. AGAIN, no one is disputing that shock tuning makes a big difference in ride quality! I don't know why that continues to be an accusation against my point, which is purely based on coil springs.
My point is that shock tuning as a ride quality improver does not disqualify the validity that coil rates make a big difference in ride quality as well.
Lighter compression valving in a shock will produce a softer ride.
lighter rate in a coil spring can do exactly the same.
I understand where the confusion is coming from. A highly respected member of this forum tried multiple coils from different manufacturers and came up with his own conclusions. I don't dispute those findings at all and certainly don't believe any deception or malice was involved, but because of his status, few (if any) questioned his findings. Multiple people have tried to speak to this issue over the years and all tend to get shot down in flames.
The problem comes when we take a conclusion based on a limited section of a field of products and apply those findings across the board to ALL of the products in the industry. The research to make such an assumption is quite obviously incomplete. You cannot make blanket assertions about an entire field of products until you have tested all of the products within that field.
These findings fly in the face of many coil spring engineers and manufacturers who have long known better. People have brought examples of spring rates vs ride quality on jeeps, dirt bikes, trucks with leaf springs, etc, and they are always shouted down for their efforts. Spring rates do matter and they do affect ride quality.
Our man made the statement that there's only a 20% difference between spring rates in the industry anyway. I'm sorry sir, but that is also incorrect.
I can most definitely prove my point and am willing to put my money where my mouth is. The results will not be inconclusive, but crystal clear.
We can keep jumping down rabbit holes of preconceived ideas on paper, or we can get down to it and see who's right.