Shock Comparison: Rancho RS5000X vs Skyjacker Black Max vs KYB Monotube

I have the Skyjacker nitro shocks and they're garbage. 0/10 would recommend. I hope the blackmax are better in every way. Then again I run a pretty light jeep so I'm sure it doesn't help. If I could run them upside down in the rear I'd be halfway okay with 'em, but I can't so they don't even have that going for them lol.

Front shocks are Skyjacker N8056S
Extended Length: 24.3”
Compressed Length: 14.52”
Travel: 10”

Rear shocks are Skyjacker N8088S
Extended Length: 24.94”
Compressed Length: 14.91”
Travel: 10”
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBoogieman
Have any of you light weights put your jeep on a scale? I'd be curious to see just how close we all are for comparison sake.
Mine weighs in at 3940 lbs, no top, no back seat, half a tank of fuel, without my fat ass in the seat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irun
Have any of you light weights put your jeep on a scale? I'd be curious to see just how close we all are for comparison sake.
Mine weighs in at 3940 lbs, no top, no back seat, half a tank of fuel, without my fat ass in the seat.
No, I haven't, but I have been thinking about it. I need a free hour or so to do it, as I would want to try and calculate my CofG as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobthetj03
The Monomax I can speak of ...

KYB makes their own shocks...
The monomax is stout.
I'd say very comparable to the Bilstein 5100.
I don't mind stout, as long as it builds resistance as the travel increases. I'm looking for something soft in the first 1.5" of travel, that can ramp up to control the body as deflection increases. The reason I got rid of the Bilstein's was because they didn't have that soft section before the control section...They were just "jittery" over small stuff. From what I've read, that means there isn't a flutterstack.

I don't know if the monomax has any such thing either (probably not, based simply on price) but I do tend to think that monotube shocks will get me closer to what I want than a twin tube design, simply because they can lighten the valving and use the nitrogen charge to help ramp the shock in compression when needed through the floating piston.


The monotube design has a single cylinder:​

The cylinder is divided into sections: A fluid area and a gas chamber. The piston and shaft move in the fluid portion. It uses a single fluid valve assembly in the piston. The diameter of the single working cylinder and piston valve is larger than in a twin tube even though the outside dimensions of each may the same. There is no need for an air or gas in the fluid area so the valve can operate more responsively and without any aeration or performance fade. The high pressure gas chamber is separated from the fluid area by a floating piston & seal. That provides an expansion area for the excess fluid movement during the compression stroke. On more aggressive movement the floating piston is pushed further into the gas chamber which increases gas pressure quickly and provides additional damping force. Because of its higher performance capabilities, the monotube design is used as original equipment on some vehicles and offered as an upgrade on vehicles that came equipped with the twin tube design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobthetj03
Have any of you light weights put your jeep on a scale? I'd be curious to see just how close we all are for comparison sake.
Mine weighs in at 3940 lbs, no top, no back seat, half a tank of fuel, without my fat ass in the seat.
Once I get everything back together I'll throw it on a truck scale. I've always been curious.
 
Have any of you light weights put your jeep on a scale? I'd be curious to see just how close we all are for comparison sake.
Mine weighs in at 3940 lbs, no top, no back seat, half a tank of fuel, without my fat ass in the seat.
Like others I plan too as well. I've been diligent about watching my Jeep diet and thus far my biggest additions in weight have been:
- dana 44 rear
- 241OR
- Warn 9.5XP winch (with TRE synthetic line), and
- Savvy control arms.

I weighed in at 3540 lbs when I started and am very curious what the jeep will weigh when I'm done.
 
No, I haven't, but I have been thinking about it. I need a free hour or so to do it, as I would want to try and calculate my CofG as well.

Me too. Nearest weigh station is about 50 minutes away by highway.

Edit: But mine is so stock I could probably just look up the manufacturer's weight, and add a little bit for all the Noico sound deadener. Actually maybe I'll look that up right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobthetj03
Can I order some from you and get a refund with free return shipping if I don't like them? ;)
p.s. I had the Skyjacker nitro and hydro shocks years ago. I thought they both rode bad. This was way back when OME yellow shocks actually rode good.
Hence the reason I say about the big advertising machine of Rancho..cough cough..Tenneco.
Rancho can shake the rep of their old tech stuff like it never happened. It's as if they never even made their 5000 series and have only ever had a 5000x..

Yet some want to hang on to the reputation of the hydro7k/nitro8k from SJ and write them off but ignore the old tech product from Rancho.?.

Hell let's bring back Trailmaster Invader N7's, SS's, Doestsch Tech, Heckethorns...

And then yes if you don't like them you can get a full refund, keep the product, plus entry into a free trinket drawing with your choice of a Casio calculator watch or a Harry Gant signed skoal bandit mesh back hat.
Bonus points if you knew his car number.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheBoogieman
Hence the reason I say about the big advertising machine of Rancho..cough cough..Tenneco.
Rancho can shake the rep of their old tech stuff like it never happened. It's as if they never even made their 5000 series and have only ever had a 5000x..

Yet some want to hang on to the reputation of the hydro7k/nitro8k from SJ and write them off but ignore the old tech product from Rancho.?.

Hell let's bring back Trailmaster Invader N7's, SS's, Doestsch Tech, Heckethorns...

And then yes if you don't like them you can get a full refund, keep the product, plus entry into a free trinket drawing with your choice of a Casio calculator watch or a Harry Gant signed skoal bandit mesh back hat.
Bonus points if you knew his car number.
33
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rubicon88
I don't mind stout, as long as it builds resistance as the travel increases. I'm looking for something soft in the first 1.5" of travel, that can ramp up to control the body as deflection increases. The reason I got rid of the Bilstein's was because they didn't have that soft section before the control section...They were just "jittery" over small stuff. From what I've read, that means there isn't a flutterstack.

I don't know if the monomax has any such thing either (probably not, based simply on price) but I do tend to think that monotube shocks will get me closer to what I want than a twin tube design, simply because they can lighten the valving and use the nitrogen charge to help ramp the shock in compression when needed through the floating piston.

The monotube design has a single cylinder:​

The cylinder is divided into sections: A fluid area and a gas chamber. The piston and shaft move in the fluid portion. It uses a single fluid valve assembly in the piston. The diameter of the single working cylinder and piston valve is larger than in a twin tube even though the outside dimensions of each may the same. There is no need for an air or gas in the fluid area so the valve can operate more responsively and without any aeration or performance fade. The high pressure gas chamber is separated from the fluid area by a floating piston & seal. That provides an expansion area for the excess fluid movement during the compression stroke. On more aggressive movement the floating piston is pushed further into the gas chamber which increases gas pressure quickly and provides additional damping force. Because of its higher performance capabilities, the monotube design is used as original equipment on some vehicles and offered as an upgrade on vehicles that came equipped with the twin tube design.
I don't know man...

Sounds like you need to custom order something.

If I'm following you right you want something soft early but more firm as it increases.

But you want this without any expense of what?

How fast are you talking on the compression?

Something really slow compressing shouldn't be a problem to what you want.

The problem is the sudden compression that happens is going to be firm. That quicker the compression the more firm you'll find that to be.
If you want resistance built as travel increases...compressing very slowly...then what about the quick compressions? If the shock did what you hoped it would be extremely stiff on a sudden compression.

Unless I'm not following you...which might be.

If I am in fact following you I'm not sure any out of the box will satisfy your demands.
 
I like many kyb products. I’m running then on my DD right now. I didn’t consider them for the Jeep because I didn’t know they existed. I run the 5000x just like many and find them okay, but I was coming from some busted ass RC so anything would have been better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBoogieman
I don't know man...

Sounds like you need to custom order something.

If I'm following you right you want something soft early but more firm as it increases.

But you want this without any expense of what?

How fast are you talking on the compression?

Something really slow compressing shouldn't be a problem to what you want.

The problem is the sudden compression that happens is going to be firm. That quicker the compression the more firm you'll find that to be.
If you want resistance built as travel increases...compressing very slowly...then what about the quick compressions? If the shock did what you hoped it would be extremely stiff on a sudden compression.

Unless I'm not following you...which might be.

If I am in fact following you I'm not sure any out of the box will satisfy your demands.
I fully intend on doing some custom tuned shocks in the future. I'm still not sure where I'll end up on my lift height though, so I'm waiting. I'm trying to get something that will be decent enough to last me a couple years.
 
I fully intend on doing some custom tuned shocks in the future. I'm still not sure where I'll end up on my lift height though, so I'm waiting. I'm trying to get something that will be decent enough to last me a couple years.
Ok...explain something so I'm on your page.
The compression rate needs defined. Are you talking about a sudden fast compression or slow crawling type compression?
 
Ok...explain something so I'm on your page.
The compression rate needs defined. Are you talking about a sudden fast compression or slow crawling type compression?
I'm taking about on road driving. I liked my bilsteins, for the most part. But when you're driving on road, and you hit small stuff, like expansion joints, tar snakes, etc. The bilsteins didn't compress, like at all. All those small events transfer to the chassis and feel harsh, or jittery. Even old asphalt, where the rocks are visible, were tactile with the bilsteins.

So... I'm looking for something that has the control of the bilstein, but less harness on the small events...

My ranchos were fine for crawling. Any time the speeds kicked up though, driving over small rocks (6-8" diameter) I started getting tossed around like I owed money.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Irun
The Blackmax IMO is the smoothest of the bunch on a TJ.

There is no better/best here...everyone likes something different. A smooth ride to driver "A" might be mush to Druver "B" or too stiff or...._____ and vice versa

@Rubicon88

Skyjacker Black MAX shocks are available in the lengths I need for my particular lift so I've added them to my spreadsheet of potential replacement shocks.

Do you have an opinion about the Skyjacker Black MAX shocks for this hypothetical:

2006 LJ hardtop.
Not a Skinny Minnie.
Not a daily driver
Drives to and from the trail head, sometimes as far as 400-500 miles.
All purpose trail jeep, not a dedicated rock crawler
Considerable driving on washboarded roads.
Actual manufacturer of current shocks unknown. Most likely Edelbrock or Bilstein, but guessing.

Cat Scale weights:

Empty except for fuel and driver: 2240# F; 2600# R; 4840# Total

Fully Loaded with fuel, spare fuel and water, camping gear and food for extended trip, tools, occupants, etc.: 2260 F; 3060 R; 5320# Total

Specific Black MAX shocks on spreadsheet: B8549 and B8528

The hypothetical jeep In "heavy" trim:

Jeep at PG&E Campground Butt Lake Reservoir.jpg
 
I'm taking about on road driving. I liked my bilsteins, for the most part. But when you're driving on road, and you hit small stuff, like expansion joints, tar snakes, etc. The bilsteins didn't compress, like at all. All those small events transfer to the chassis and feel harsh, or jittery. Even old asphalt, where the rocks are visible, were tactile with the bilsteins.

So... I'm looking for something that has the control of the bilstein, but less harness on the small events...

My ranchos were fine for crawling. Any time the speeds kicked up though, driving over small rocks (6-8" diameter) I started getting tossed around like I owed money.
Your postings are a great example of the shock advising problem.
What you're describing might not matter to anyone else.

The other thing that needs pointing out...
These are still light short WB vehicles.
I'm definitely not meaning to insult your Jeep IQ but some of what you're describing could be handled with air pressure.
Maybe you've done those experiments...
 
@Rubicon88

Skyjacker Black MAX shocks are available in the lengths I need for my particular lift so I've added them to my spreadsheet of potential replacement shocks.

Do you have an opinion about the Skyjacker Black MAX shocks for this hypothetical:

2006 LJ hardtop.
Not a Skinny Minnie.
Not a daily driver
Drives to and from the trail head, sometimes as far as 400-500 miles.
All purpose trail jeep, not a dedicated rock crawler
Considerable driving on washboarded roads.
Actual manufacturer of current shocks unknown. Most likely Edelbrock or Bilstein, but guessing.

Cat Scale weights:

Empty except for fuel and driver: 2240# F; 2600# R; 4840# Total

Fully Loaded with fuel, spare fuel and water, camping gear and food for extended trip, tools, occupants, etc.: 2260 F; 3060 R; 5320# Total

Specific Black MAX shocks on spreadsheet: B8549 and B8528

The hypothetical jeep In "heavy" trim:

View attachment 254919
Well...
I can tell you my experience in a similar platform to your hypothesis subject.

They work really good on 4 door JK's modified that has to be approaching your subject weight. Negligible weight difference I'd say.

I really believe this...
While Rancho was busy worrying about getting the Ford contract SJ had the foresight of where Jeep was heading and I believe that shock had one vehicle driving it's design. The Jeep.

Just look at what the JK did for Jeep. They're everywhere.

They'll never admit that on record but info I have sure points to that.