OHFIVETJ
TJ Addict
And tying up liquid cash on a toy is dumb when you can borrow for a cheap rate and keep your cash working for you or invest in much higher yield returns.
As a rule, you would be mostly correct but if I can borrow at 3.9% and my investments are paying well at 7% percent on average ( I won’t count this last year of 26% as it was a fluke year), I’d say leveraging my money where it pays me more, is a smarter move.
it’s also a reason I’m going to be fully retired at 50 years old with not only zero debt, but a very nice income to live on.
Don’t always assume we are all 20 years old making minimum wage.
Of course I get it, IF your GUARANTEED 7% ( no one can, everything is a gamble some at higher risk then others )
you would make 3% by keeping your money & only paying out 4% & then lose it on capital gains / interest / TAX & on $10,000 it's so minimal it's not even worth it. I don't consider as stated 3% a much higher return.
I'd rather have NO gamble & NO payment, I say WRITE THE CHECK !!
BTW: The OP said he didn't have the $10,000 & if anything broke or needed money for repairs he most likely doesn't have any money for that either. Negating in his situation, your entire DON'T pay cash post
Oh, and I didn't ASSume any thing about anyone's age at all, you know what happens when you do that