Only thing getting cloaked isyoursomeone else's judgment about spending money on stuff that doesn't work![]()
FIFY.
Only thing getting cloaked isyoursomeone else's judgment about spending money on stuff that doesn't work![]()
Word on the street is Metalcloak fenders give you more uptravel....![]()
When building shock mounts with any attempt at doing a decent job requires a lot of cycling of the axles. The process can't help but show where the clearances are. Where Metalcloak fenders create room over factory and if the project needs to use it, you will know early on.
I’ll just emphasize your comment on cycling the axles! So much damn cycling!
The Jeep world would be a better place if more people cycled their axles.
Still not in a position to outboard yet but am curious on shock vs axle/wheel travel afterwards. After making my tummy tuck I've messed with the rear end and realized I'll definitely need an SSSYE, the rear driveshaft is almost binding at full droop and I currently have ranchos and Currie springs with ~6" of up travel on the shock. My question is with 12" outboarded shocks are you increasing any axle/wheel travel or where changing the positioning of them is just giving you more shock length to utilize for the same axles/wheel travel as stock mounts? @jjvw I'm sure you understand what I mean
Still not in a position to outboard yet but am curious on shock vs axle/wheel travel afterwards. After making my tummy tuck I've messed with the rear end and realized I'll definitely need an SSSYE, the rear driveshaft is almost binding at full droop and I currently have ranchos and Currie springs with ~6" of up travel on the shock. My question is with 12" outboarded shocks are you increasing any axle/wheel travel or where changing the positioning of them is just giving you more shock length to utilize for the same axles/wheel travel as stock mounts? @jjvw I'm sure you understand what I mean
More than real. We are about 50/50 with those we have to build a center limit for.How much downtravel? There is a very real possibility that you will bind your driveshaft at full droop with a balanced 12" shock in the rear. Uptravel shouldn't bind it (unless the driveshaft is too long). I believe @jjvw is running a limit strap in the center of his axle to combat the driveshaft bind at droop.
How much downtravel? There is a very real possibility that you will bind your driveshaft at full droop with a balanced 12" shock in the rear. Uptravel shouldn't bind it (unless the driveshaft is too long). I believe @jjvw is running a limit strap in the center of his axle to combat the driveshaft bind at droop.
The simple answer is to understand how shocks work relative to travel. Simple numbers, if you take an 8" travel shock and then build the same shock with 9" of travel, the body has to be longer for the shaft to travel fully. The limit for the rear shock mounts is how high you can move the top of the shock before it goes through the bottom of the tub. So, if you take the 9" travel shock and make it again longer, it will eventually get to the point where the body of the shock is resting against the shock eye because you haven't been able to move the top of the shock upward.
You have to move the top of the shock up to get back to a reasonable bias. Since we also like the bottom of the shock to be a bit higher and up out of the rocks, we move the lower up which again, moves the top up to maintain bias.
Not sure where you're trying to get to. Even if, why would you mount a shock at 30 degrees inward at the top?My thought is from say take a 12" travel shock and mount it vertically from the axle, you will have more vertical/even droop than if the same shocks were angled at 30° inwards.
Not sure where you're trying to get to. Even if, why would you mount a shock at 30 degrees inward at the top?
Basically with going to 12" travel shocks from rancho 9.6" am I adding 2.4" of total axle travel, up and/or down? And I'm not sure, but I know outboarding requires a bit of angle inward at the top, and was figuring on it not adding the complete 2.4" because of that. How much it differs is what I was wondering.
The small bit of inward lean is negated under articulation by the lower mount being inboard of the tire so when that side droops, the lower mount moves under the top shock eye with the shock straight up and down.
Am I to assume a negligible amount of change at non-articulated full droop?
Change in what?
How much downtravel? There is a very real possibility that you will bind your driveshaft at full droop with a balanced 12" shock in the rear. Uptravel shouldn't bind it (unless the driveshaft is too long). I believe @jjvw is running a limit strap in the center of his axle to combat the driveshaft bind at droop.
Mine has a center limit strap to prevent driveshaft bind at about the last 3/4" of droop. The was just above the point where spinning a tire stopped turning the driveshaft and tcase via the parasitic draw through differential.
You have an SSSYE and a savvy TT, correct?