Listen man, I'm not arguing you're better off without one. I'm simply saying you don't need to run one. Yeah, we have jeeps that go on big rocks and run on the highway too. Obviously if you throw more money at it, you're gonna get a smoother riding jeep all around. We know we're just as fine running without one than running with one so we don't waste the money time or effort.
Because he has an 8.8 and didn’t want to re engineer anything.
to each their own man. If you wanna keep it in thats your purgative. It works just fine without one.
exactly! much more useful than a stupid rear sway bar
Running no swaybars works without a doubt I am sure... but I can tell you a lot of people like the antirock because it gives more stability than no swaybar. There is a thread somewhere that talks about Maximum flex and useable flex or something along those lines, its worth the read. It is my understanding that people like the antirock(torsion bars) because they provide stable yet a good amount of useful flex without having to disconnect
Yeah, I agree, the antirock works, I run one in the front. just dont need one in the rear.
Plenty of stability and traction without one. If I really needed one I'd run one. But, I get through everything just fine. I appreciate the concern for my jeeps offroad capability though!
I guess my question is what benefit does removing the rear swaybar add?
Yeah I mean you can't forget new england isn't colorado and I;m not saying colorado is new england. I;m sorry it doesn't fly under the one way of thinking around here but it works just fine.
